The article in the OP says this:
And yet, if you follow the embedded link and read the
article Kozak shared, you'll see it doesn't say regret equals rape, and does not encourage that sort of thinking:
It happens to us with consistent hookups, first dates, boyfriends, and one-night stands alike. We have sex with guys, because sometimes it’s just easier to do it than to have the argument about not doing it. But no one talks about it. Talking about it makes it a big deal. It makes us feel like we’re whining. It makes us feel like we’re being dramatic. And we don’t want it to be dramatic. We don’t feel entirely violated. It doesn’t affect us forever. We just feel like we got the short end of the stick, and that sometimes, we have to do something we don’t want to do, out of politeness or social obligation. So why bring it up? Why risk wrongfully tagging a guy with a serious, heavy label he doesn’t deserve? And more importantly, why risk being wrongfully tagged as “the girl who cried rape,” when we’re not trying to say it was rape at all? We’re saying we don’t know what it was. We just didn’t like it. But by refusing to acknowledge the existence of these rape-ish situations, we’re continuing to subject ourselves to them indefinitely.
I don't know what to make of that. Perhaps Ms. Kozak misrepresented the article, or perhaps the student's lawyers are misrepresenting Ms. Kovak's statements and reason for showing it to students.
If the rest of the article is accurate then it appears the system treated the male student unfairly, but only because he was just as drunk as the female student so whatever befell him should have befallen her too (assuming the school doesn't give immunity to students who report wrongdoing).
