After nearly 8 years of his regime (reign? Dictatorship?) it should be clear why Barack HUSSEIN Obama won't.
Because if he does, then Isis, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, and all the other Radical Islamic Terrorists will simply give up. He knows this, and as he's clearly in league with them (he's a Mooslim himself) it would foil his nefarious plan to spread the ideology across the globe.
Fortunately, the first words President Trump will utter after he's sworn in by Supreme Court Justice Judge Judy will be "radical Islam," and then the War on Terror will finally be over and we can start building that wall to keep the swarthy people out so we don't become like Europe.
He's making the same mistake that so many liberals are.
He's making the same mistake that so many liberals are.
You're not really good at detecting sarcasm, are you?
You ask that after looking in the mirror?So, is the fault of BLMers or Islam?
How can anyone be so obtuse?
CNN reported that with so many injuries of the kind that the death toll is likely to rise.
Although that might be apparent, given the nature of the injuries and sheer number of victims, the numbers may be higher than the usual rise we see with bombings.
It will be 100.
What is that? Pretending saying a particular phrase will magically end these sorts of things? Or are you suggesting that terror attacks in France are Obama's fault? Or that Obama doesn't think defeating terror cells is important? Which mistake exactly?After nearly 8 years of his regime (reign? Dictatorship?) it should be clear why Barack HUSSEIN Obama won't.
Because if he does, then Isis, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, and all the other Radical Islamic Terrorists will simply give up. He knows this, and as he's clearly in league with them (he's a Mooslim himself) it would foil his nefarious plan to spread the ideology across the globe.
Fortunately, the first words President Trump will utter after he's sworn in by Supreme Court Justice Judge Judy will be "radical Islam," and then the War on Terror will finally be over and we can start building that wall to keep the swarthy people out so we don't become like Europe.
He's making the same mistake that so many liberals are.
At this point it is a tragedy, regardless the final toll.It will be 100.
Let's hope not
What is that? Pretending saying a particular phrase will magically end these sorts of things? Or are you suggesting that terror attacks in France are Obama's fault? Or that Obama doesn't think defeating terror cells is important? Which mistake exactly?He's making the same mistake that so many liberals are.
What is that? Pretending saying a particular phrase will magically end these sorts of things? Or are you suggesting that terror attacks in France are Obama's fault? Or that Obama doesn't think defeating terror cells is important? Which mistake exactly?
The weird thing about all this is that when it comes to eliminating "terrorists," the Obama administration has been far more frightfully efficient than his predecessor.
The Bush administration invaded an entire country in an attempt to take out Osama. The Obama administration sent a SEAL team to his house. While the previous incarnation of the US government used "regime change" as a means of dealing with the problem, the current one is employing ruthless and in some cases indiscriminate deployments of targeted drone strikes and special operations to kill individuals.
If I were a Jihadist, I'd much rather be dealing with Bush's blundering approach.
You ask that after looking in the mirror?How can anyone be so obtuse?
What is that? Pretending saying a particular phrase will magically end these sorts of things? Or are you suggesting that terror attacks in France are Obama's fault? Or that Obama doesn't think defeating terror cells is important? Which mistake exactly?
The weird thing about all this is that when it comes to eliminating "terrorists," the Obama administration has been far more frightfully efficient than his predecessor.
The Bush administration invaded an entire country in an attempt to take out Osama. The Obama administration sent a SEAL team to his house. While the previous incarnation of the US government used "regime change" as a means of dealing with the problem, the current one is employing ruthless and in some cases indiscriminate deployments of targeted drone strikes and special operations to kill individuals.
If I were a Jihadist, I'd much rather be dealing with Bush's blundering approach.
More like their politicians who literally invited the problem to come over.Quickly! Everyone blame the victims!
More like their politicians who literally invited the problem to come over.Quickly! Everyone blame the victims!
"Swarthyness" is not the problem but the islamist ideology many of them are bringing along. But it's not PC to connect Islam with terrorism (see Hillary's tweet)."The problem" being scary swarthy people. You're not fooling anyone.
"Swarthyness" is not the problem but the islamist ideology many of them are bringing along. But it's not PC to connect Islam with terrorism (see Hillary's tweet)."The problem" being scary swarthy people. You're not fooling anyone.
There is certainly a problem with a particular religious group. Not every member of that group, but certainly with the group as a whole.You're not saying anything specific towards any racial or religious group.
There is certainly a problem with a particular religious group.You're not saying anything specific towards any racial or religious group.
Bill O'Reilly and Charles Krauthammer were blathering on Faux, wondering if Trump will be using this as an attack on hillary to get elected. Trump will claim only he can keep us safe from ISIL. I suspect he'll try. Stay tuned for more Trump jingoism.
Don't think Trump has to do anything but let Clinton dig herself deeper.
#notallnazis
A religion is a set of ideas, not an immutable attribute of a person.So you're an unabashed bigot.