Explaining to me how God made the universe from the materials he had on hand would give me the power to recreate the universe from those materials by doing the same things as God. If it doesn't do that, it's not an explanation.
If I gave you a baseball could you throw a no-hitter for the Mets?
If you adequately
explained how it was done,
and gave me the resources to do it, yes.
The resources are the baseball.
That's all any other pitcher uses.
And of course there are many people who could explain the proper way to pitch a baseball.
Is that all it takes?
The pitcher has muscles that have been developed in a certain way. He has connections in his brain which have developed over many years of practice. He has a high degree of familiarity with the conditions in which he will pitch, and acquired skills in observing and predicting the behaviour of the batter. All of which means that
explaining how to throw a no-hitter for the Mets is not a trivial job, even if you knew how to do it. It might take years, like 'explaining' how to be a successful brain surgeon. But
if you can explain it adequately, and
if I have the time and the neural capacity and the muscular potential, then yes, I can do it, given more or less the same amount of high-level practice. If I
can't do it, given the same resources as someone who
can, then you haven't explained it successfully.
But 'explaining the proper way to pitch a baseball' is not the same as 'explaining how to throw a no-hitter for the Mets', and I don't know anyone who would be silly enough to think it was.