Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 50,567
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
link
[/FONT]
So, what is the basis for stalling the bill, which would likely pass, by the way? Revenue generating bills must originate in the House. This bill is a sanctions bill, of which it's purpose is not to make money. Seriously, what the fuck is going on in DC?!
article said:[FONT="]On Tuesday Ryan fell back on a constitutional technicality to stall the measure. The bill, which significantly ratchets up sanctions on both Russia and Iran, violates the origination clause of the Constitution, he argued, referring to the requirement that any bill raising revenue originate in the House.
[/FONT]
The Republicans are stalling a bill to codify sanctions by the previous Administration over interference in the US election by Russia. Today, we heard that 21 states were targeted by Russia during the never ending election fuckfest.article said:Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) faced a deeply unappetizing political calculus this week after the Senate passed by an overwhelming margin an aggressive sanctions bill targeting Russia.If Ryan brought the bill to the floor, it would likely pass, because it had enough Iran-related measures to ensure Republican support, and no one wants to look weak on Russia right now. If he referred it one of several committees with jurisdiction on the issue, the bill will might die a death by a thousand cuts. Or, Ryan could introduce his own measure, creating a split with the Senate and more differences to be resolved.
So, what is the basis for stalling the bill, which would likely pass, by the way? Revenue generating bills must originate in the House. This bill is a sanctions bill, of which it's purpose is not to make money. Seriously, what the fuck is going on in DC?!
