ABC reports 400 wounded. I think it's a mistake.
Probably--I would think the wounded would be even higher. He was firing into a packed crowd--I would expect to see a lot of trampling type injuries.
ABC reports 400 wounded. I think it's a mistake.
But fully automatics, which this guy appeared to have used, are already heavily restricted and society is not saturated with them. They are essentially forbidden. If he used this, which it seems he did, then he didn't get them from a gun shop, and most black market firearms are the same firearms (albeit unrecorded) of the ones in the gun shops.
Society is not saturated with fully automatic firearms.
Semi-automatics are everywhere.
And turning them in to automatics is not hard.
It will change nothing. Shooting six-year-olds in their classroom didn't. I have cousins who spout this "What we need is more guns" line. I've learned not to discuss this issue.
Yes, I've heard this said many times. If the cold-blooded murder of innocent schoolchildren didn't get this country to change our gun laws, then we're beyond help, and the shootings will continue. I'll never understand how Sandy Hook wasn't the point where America collectively got up and said, "Enough is enough!" Families of the slain should sue the fucking NRA for not even allowing sensible gun legislation to move forward.
Now, recently Republicans were working on legalizing silencers. Yea, I know they don't work like in the movies. But it would have made it even tougher to tell where the shots were coming from, giving him more time to shoot up the place if he had one.
Since it's a 64 year old, retired white male, whose motivations are unknown...
anyone want to speculate as to why he did it?
Voices. Drugs. Anger at increasing socioeconomic inequality. Anger at increasing socioeconomic equality.
Yeah, the guns are just an excuse. They people have been killing people long before guns even existed!
When, long before guns existed, was any single person credited with killing more than 50 and wounding more than 500 people from 1700 feet away?
I'm less interested in the why, and more in the how. We likely can't fix the why. We could at least, in theory, try to address the how. As a nation, we won't, but it is always nice to pretend for a moment, that as a nation, we'd try to see to it that this doesn't happen again... and that not requiring me to take off my clothes and empty my bags before entering a hotel.
One part of "how":
How did he get a fully automatic assault weapon? Are those modifications something that anyone can do in their garage?
If I had access to technology, I'd be building fully auto railguns for fun, and scaring religious people with them... for fun, and scaring corrupt politicians for the greater good.
Just as I said: whenever a Muslim does something, it is downplayed.No, one guy knifed a few people.
Do you think it is a good idea for Canada to take in Somali fakefugees who US wants to deport because they are criminals?
Hell, before I left the military, they were switching over from M-16s with a fully automatic setting to M-16s with a three round burst setting.
On the bright side, we finally have proof of God.
‘I’m a Firm Believer in God Now’: Emotional Las Vegas Shooting Survivor Says He’s No Longer Agnostic — Here’s Why | CBN News
“I was agnostic going into that concert and I’m a firm believer in God now,” Benge told CNN on Monday morning. “Because there’s no way that all of that happened and that I made it and I was blessed enough to still be here alive talking to you today.”
Glad that's settled.
mine tooMy money's on a gambling addiction and a split with his partner.
Yes, I've heard this said many times. If the cold-blooded murder of innocent schoolchildren didn't get this country to change our gun laws, then we're beyond help, and the shootings will continue. I'll never understand how Sandy Hook wasn't the point where America collectively got up and said, "Enough is enough!" Families of the slain should sue the fucking NRA for not even allowing sensible gun legislation to move forward.
What is going on is that many of us understand the defensive benefit of guns outweighs the mass shootings. Most other gun uses are by criminals and gun control laws won't stop them.
mine tooMy money's on a gambling addiction and a split with his partner.
Now, recently Republicans were working on legalizing silencers. Yea, I know they don't work like in the movies. But it would have made it even tougher to tell where the shots were coming from, giving him more time to shoot up the place if he had one.
Silencers are about protecting one's hearing, not about hiding where a shot came from. "Silencing" a rifle isn't going to much to hide it.
Since it's a 64 year old, retired white male, whose motivations are unknown...
anyone want to speculate as to why he did it?
Voices. Drugs. Anger at increasing socioeconomic inequality. Anger at increasing socioeconomic equality.
I'm going to guess he was not making a lot of money, had poured his money into guns (despite what the brother said he had a pile of them) and had nothing for retirement.
A silencer does not silence. It muffles the sound of the powder burn a little but does nothing about the supersonic bang of the round, the major noise of the gun shot.Silencers are about protecting one's hearing, not about hiding where a shot came from. "Silencing" a rifle isn't going to much to hide it.
We know that's the NRA's bullshit claim.
The fact remains that a silencer in this situation would have allowed this murderer to kill a lot more people before police located him.
I think that a lot could be learned about his frame of mind and reasoning if his ex-girlfriend was interviewed. I'm thinking that his mindset is likely why she left him and the country.I'm going to guess he was not making a lot of money, had poured his money into guns (despite what the brother said he had a pile of them) and had nothing for retirement.
The brother says he was worth millions.
Semi-automatics are everywhere.
And turning them in to automatics is not hard.
You're an expert on this?