• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Do Democrats Realize They Are The Party Of Racism?

"Historically" doesn't determine it. What was true in the past might not still be true.

There are likely racists in both parties. But who specifically?

Trump's a different issue from political parties because he's an individual person. You can tell if he's racist from his behavior. It's current-enough and he hasn't apologized.


...Trump wasn't the one who first brought up Obama's birth certificate. He just went along with it. Wouldn't every honest American? I want to make sure our Presidents are born in the United States and that no one is trying to pull a fast one over our eyes by trying to become President in an illegal way. How is that considered "racist?"

Because people like you never ever ever wanted to "make sure our Presidents are born in the United States" until it was a black man running for office.

You didn't care when John McCain or Ted Cruz were running. Further, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Q. Adams, Andrew Jackson, and William Henry Harrison were NOT born in the United States. Bet you never had a hissy fit over that, did you?
 
It's truly amazing how EVERY company in America is a "left wing" company whenever it suits an argument.

When they don't go after channels who bash Christians, but they go after a channel full of Christians, I'd say yes, that's good solid evidence the company is left-wing.

CCan you give an example of a channel that bashes christians?
 
"Historically" doesn't determine it. What was true in the past might not still be true.

There are likely racists in both parties. But who specifically?

Trump's a different issue from political parties because he's an individual person. You can tell if he's racist from his behavior. It's current-enough and he hasn't apologized.


...Trump wasn't the one who first brought up Obama's birth certificate. He just went along with it. Wouldn't every honest American? I want to make sure our Presidents are born in the United States and that no one is trying to pull a fast one over our eyes by trying to become President in an illegal way. How is that considered "racist?"

Because people like you never ever ever wanted to "make sure our Presidents are born in the United States" until it was a black man running for office.

You didn't care when John McCain or Ted Cruz were running. Further, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Q. Adams, Andrew Jackson, and William Henry Harrison were NOT born in the United States. Bet you never had a hissy fit over that, did you?

I didn't know about them. To even hint at the fact that I might be a racist is disgusting. I have fought against racism in this whole thread pointing out who the real racists are. As I have said in post #497 that went unrefuted:

Look at Candace Owens.

What the left says about her:

"Uncle Tom"
"Auntie Tom"
"Bed Wench"
"House N****R"
"Get back to your place in the Democratic party!"
"Nothing I hate more than a black conservative!"

What the right says about her:

"Intelligent woman"
"Very thoughtful"
"A great representation of our party"
"Should run for President"
"A breath of fresh air"

Doesn't take a genius to see who the racists are.
 
CCan you give an example of a channel that bashes christians?

Atheistic channels.

So that's a 'no' then.

Are you trying to tell me there's no "atheistic channels" on television?

I mean Sunday morning I was flipping around the dial and was shocked at the number of atheistic channels that were on my television! All I was looking for was a channel that had some sort of religious programming early on a Sunday morning, but my search was stymied! Almost every one I came across had a show called something like "the godless hour" where some guy in a suit in front of an auditorium of non-believers bashed Jesus continually.

Finally, I landed on a network that appeared to be a news outlet, but sure enough, they started the broadcast with a message that said "we're your source of liberal atheist-leaning news" and launched into a story about how Christians were all bad people.

I think it was NBC.
 
So that's a 'no' then.

Are you trying to tell me there's no "atheistic channels" on television?

I mean Sunday morning I was flipping around the dial and was shocked at the number of atheistic channels that were on my television! All I was looking for was a channel that had some sort of religious programming early on a Sunday morning, but my search was stymied! Almost every one I came across had a show called something like "the godless hour" where some guy in a suit in front of an auditorium of non-believers bashed Jesus continually.

Finally, I landed on a network that appeared to be a news outlet, but sure enough, they started the broadcast with a message that said "we're your source of liberal atheist-leaning news" and launched into a story about how Christians were all bad people.

I think it was NBC.

I was speaking about atheistic youtube channels. Calling Christians the scourge of all mankind and other such nonsense. But, COMEDIAN Steven Crowder calls Carlos Maza a queer Mexican and the youtube gestapo is calling for blood. The Nazi's used to silence all opposition as well...
 
There's now a petition on the right to include "S" at the end of "LGBTQS" in order to include heterosexuality and make it more inclusive for everyone.

Guess what the loving tolerant left said? They say it's dumb to have pride that you're straight and call us bigots.

Once again, the right wants to be included in their sexual pride, the left says no.
This is like when people got mad at "All Lives Matter" in a response to "Black Lives Matter" They called the right racists even though "black" is included in "All."

Which side is the more tolerant side again?
 
The left. You guys are a pack of edited.

Moderator Note: Thread split to here
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The left. You guys are a pack of edited.

Are you suggesting that if you are LGBTQ you can have pride in that, but if you are straight you can't be proud of that? Why can't EVERYONE be proud of their sexuality?

Now we're back to being racist for being proud to be white, but not racist for being proud to be black.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder if Half-Life can go more than three post without changing the subject or moving the goalposts.
 
or making them use the whites-only line at airport security.
well to be fair, some of these 'white pride' people probably want a whites-only line at the airport, as well as a bunch of other whites-only stuff.

It is amazing how well this is all pointed out by the old Dr Seuss story The Sneetches. One group treats another group like dirt, the second group strives for equality, and when they are achieving it the first group is all upset because they don't get to be special anymore. Just add in accusations of the second group wanting to 'replace' the first group and you have a great example of the country today.


[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/PdLPe7XjdKc[/YOUTUBE]

 
So that's a 'no' then.

Are you trying to tell me there's no "atheistic channels" on television?

I mean Sunday morning I was flipping around the dial and was shocked at the number of atheistic channels that were on my television! All I was looking for was a channel that had some sort of religious programming early on a Sunday morning, but my search was stymied! Almost every one I came across had a show called something like "the godless hour" where some guy in a suit in front of an auditorium of non-believers bashed Jesus continually.

Finally, I landed on a network that appeared to be a news outlet, but sure enough, they started the broadcast with a message that said "we're your source of liberal atheist-leaning news" and launched into a story about how Christians were all bad people.

I think it was NBC.

I was speaking about atheistic youtube channels. Calling Christians the scourge of all mankind and other such nonsense..
LOL...you do like to shift what you say and mean all over the map. You were talking about 'leftist companies". Youtube channels are NOT "leftist companies".

But, COMEDIAN Steven Crowder calls Carlos Maza a queer Mexican and the youtube gestapo is calling for blood. The Nazi's used to silence all opposition as well..
Youtube is a private company that chooses not to harbor racist hate as well as they can manage. Amazing how you don't seem to like free enterprise and capitalism when it doesn't support your alternate-reality. FFvC trying to threaten media outlets is far more like your 'Nazi' silencing meme...


PS Any chance you will ever get back to explaining your irrational fear of whities dying out that I've asked about a few times now?
 
PS Any chance you will ever get back to explaining your irrational fear of whities dying out that I've asked about a few times now?
I dunno, maybe try talking about Trump's chances of going to jail after someone else takes the office? Then he'll want to talk about white genocide.
 
I was speaking about atheistic youtube channels. Calling Christians the scourge of all mankind and other such nonsense..
LOL...you do like to shift what you say and mean all over the map. You were talking about 'leftist companies". Youtube channels are NOT "leftist companies".

But, COMEDIAN Steven Crowder calls Carlos Maza a queer Mexican and the youtube gestapo is calling for blood. The Nazi's used to silence all opposition as well..
Youtube is a private company that chooses not to harbor racist hate as well as they can manage. Amazing how you don't seem to like free enterprise and capitalism when it doesn't support your alternate-reality. FFvC trying to threaten media outlets is far more like your 'Nazi' silencing meme...


PS Any chance you will ever get back to explaining your irrational fear of whities dying out that I've asked about a few times now?

But that's the thing. Steven Crowder is not a racist. That's why everyone is pissed off. The left calls a person a racist all the time with no basis in reality. It's their modus operandi. If the left disagrees with what you say, you're a racist, bigot, or spewing hate speech.

There's no actual definition.
 
There is nothing wrong with it, so long as you like being a racist cunt. Do you like being a racist cunt?

Well, after slavery, lynching, Jim Crow, institutional racism, 'colored bathrooms' and all the fun stuff heaped upon blacks for years and years and years, someone standing up and saying despite that, I am proud to be black, I won't let you define me as a lesser being, that's bravery.

After being the ones shitting on blacks for all that time, though, white people trying to have a white pride month is just pathetic. No one's lynching whites, or shipping them off to the plantain plantations overseas, or making them use the whites-only line at airport security. So screaming for an equal opportunity to rise above victimhood just draws attention to... To what? What is the discrimination whites need to respond to?

And like I said, all that stuff against black people was put in place by the Democrats. And white people are being hated nowadays. Like I said, the straight white male is the most hated demographic right now. People are being turned down from jobs because they are white and male. If that's not racism, what is?
 
The Daily Wire is a bigoted site that spews hate towards leftist and non-christians. Why should I bother reading a site that censors leftists?

You didn't reply to the content of my post. How are they bigoted? They do not censor leftists.
 
The Daily Wire is a bigoted site that spews hate towards leftist and non-christians. Why should I bother reading a site that censors leftists?

You didn't reply to the content of my post. How are they bigoted? They do not censor leftists.

They are bigoted. You just can't see it. Therefore, your argument has no meaning. You have yet to post a picture of a Trump rally with more than five black people in the picture, by the way.
 
And like I said, all that stuff against black people was put in place by the Democrats.
Southern ones, the ones who have turned into Republicans over the last half century. The Republican Party is now the party of Jefferson Davis.

And white people are being hated nowadays. Like I said, the straight white male is the most hated demographic right now.
Hated by who?

I thought that conservatives were opposed to considering oneself a victim. I thought that they believed in taking responsibility for one's actions and meekly accepting that life isn't fair.
 
Well, after slavery, lynching, Jim Crow, institutional racism, 'colored bathrooms' and all the fun stuff heaped upon blacks for years and years and years, someone standing up and saying despite that, I am proud to be black, I won't let you define me as a lesser being, that's bravery.

After being the ones <expletive deleted> on blacks for all that time, though, white people trying to have a white pride month is just pathetic. No one's lynching whites, or shipping them off to the plantain plantations overseas, or making them use the whites-only line at airport security. So screaming for an equal opportunity to rise above victimhood just draws attention to... To what? What is the discrimination whites need to respond to?
You know, if you object to the white people trying to have a white pride month screaming for an equal opportunity to rise above victimhood, and would rather they not do it, you might want to think about whether it's a good idea to repeat shrink-wrapped trumped-up ad hominems against them. How hard can that be?

Or can you actually point out any of the white people trying to have a white pride month who actually did any of the things you just accused them of? Do you have any evidence that Half-Life, or any of the other white people trying to have a white pride month etc., in point of fact enslaved anyone, lynched anyone, enacted Jim Crow laws, instituted institutional racism, or made anybody use "colored bathrooms"? You can't? Then don't say they did. Being falsely accused is the sort of thing that tends to get people's backs up. It only reinforces their feeling that it's open season on whatever group you're maligning.

When you falsely accuse somebody of crapping on blacks, and you imply it's okay to falsely accuse him of crapping on blacks because his skin is the same color as entirely different people who crapped on blacks and that makes it okay, you are defining him as a lesser being. So if you would prefer that he stop having his "I won't let you define me as a lesser being" reaction, stop defining him as a lesser being.
 
Back
Top Bottom