• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Does "White Privilege" Exist When Asians Make (on average) More Than Whites?

If that was a white gang beating up a black man, CNN would've been all over it. Al Shapton and Jesse Jackson would be having heart attacks. It would be called a racist white supremacist crime.

How come they aren't coming out screaming, "Black supremacists beat up innocent white man!"

If that man had a gun, they would've all bee shot dead. Are the Dems going to play this clip for Beto while he screams, "We're gonna take your guns!" Of course not. More liberal hypocrisy. This video makes my blood boil so bad. Only white people are bad and evil. Im sick of this nonsense!

This happened in Illhan Omar's district too! But we know what she would say: "Some people did something today."

I would like someone on this forum to logically explain why white on black crime gets blown up by the media into a racially motivated crime, but black on white crime gets swept under the rug and you barely hear a peep about it. Is that black privilege?

I can hear some of you saying, "Did this black gang beat up this man just because he was white?" The answer is most likely no. But, if the gang was all white and they beat up a black man, there's no doubt all you guys would be saying, "they beat him solely because he's black!!!!"
 
Last edited:
Who says that?

If you don't know that the left runs around screaming, "White privilege!" then you just don't follow politics enough.

This is equivalent to a person asking, "Who's The Beatles?" when discussing music.
No, it's much more like you once again just assuming people will take your claims and fantasy 'what ifs' at face value, and you never being able to support yourself.
 
It's why people like Rachel Dolezal claim they are black even though they are white and Elizabeth Warren claims to be Native American despite being white. It's more of a privilege to identify as a minority.
I grew up thinking (and saying) we were part Cherokee because that's what my great-grandmother told everyone. Until a Mormon married into the family, and the genealogy came back. Mayflower, yes, Cherokee, no.
That's when i stopped thinking or saying any NA heritage.
Note that both times, what i said was because it was what i believed to be true.
Not for any privlege.
 
Asians with the same education don't earn more, but less initially. After being in the US, for a couple of generations, then Asians of the same educational level are equal. This can be explained by recruitment of educated foreigners from Asia, followed by passing down cultural academic advantages by educated parents.

Part of the explanation for Asians' higher wages is their greater-than-average educational attainment: in the 1990s, 23.3 percent of the total U.S. male population had at least a college degree, while 48.7 percent of Asian Indian men, 41.6 percent of Filipino men, and 35 percent of Chinese men had at least a college degree.[5] The higher educational attainment of Asians masks the fact that a wage gap exists between Asians and whites of the same occupations. Whites earn more than Asians in almost all occupational categories when other factors are controlled.[5] Asians still make 8% less than whites in comparable jobs except for Asians who have been in the United States for one and a half generations, whom have reached full parity in income.[26]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_wage_gap_in_the_United_States

Note that you're proving it's not racism.
 
Asians with the same education don't earn more, but less initially. After being in the US, for a couple of generations, then Asians of the same educational level are equal. This can be explained by recruitment of educated foreigners from Asia, followed by passing down cultural academic advantages by educated parents.

Part of the explanation for Asians' higher wages is their greater-than-average educational attainment: in the 1990s, 23.3 percent of the total U.S. male population had at least a college degree, while 48.7 percent of Asian Indian men, 41.6 percent of Filipino men, and 35 percent of Chinese men had at least a college degree.[5] The higher educational attainment of Asians masks the fact that a wage gap exists between Asians and whites of the same occupations. Whites earn more than Asians in almost all occupational categories when other factors are controlled.[5] Asians still make 8% less than whites in comparable jobs except for Asians who have been in the United States for one and a half generations, whom have reached full parity in income.[26]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_wage_gap_in_the_United_States

Note that you're proving it's not racism.

Supremacism or racism?
 
Average wealth doesn't matter when the super-wealthy are still mostly white. Power is not a matter of average wealth, but immense and disproportionate wealth.

Also, this country was founded on giving the white race special advantages. Not sure why that's a controversial statement.
 
If that was a white gang beating up a black man, CNN would've been all over it. Al Shapton and Jesse Jackson would be having heart attacks. It would be called a racist white supremacist crime.

How come they aren't coming out screaming, "Black supremacists beat up innocent white man!"

If that man had a gun, they would've all bee shot dead. Are the Dems going to play this clip for Beto while he screams, "We're gonna take your guns!" Of course not. More liberal hypocrisy. This video makes my blood boil so bad. Only white people are bad and evil. Im sick of this nonsense!

This happened in Illhan Omar's district too! But we know what she would say: "Some people did something today."

I would like someone on this forum to logically explain why white on black crime gets blown up by the media into a racially motivated crime, but black on white crime gets swept under the rug and you barely hear a peep about it. Is that black privilege?

I can hear some of you saying, "Did this black gang beat up this man just because he was white?" The answer is most likely no. But, if the gang was all white and they beat up a black man, there's no doubt all you guys would be saying, "they beat him solely because he's black!!!!"

Here is what you are missing. If those gang members are identified they will be arrested, charged, and most likely convicted and do hard time. Now, contrast that with what would happen in the exact same circumstances if the man were black, and those beating him were wearing Police uniforms. The only one arrested would be the black man. None of the assailants would be charged or convicted of anything.

Yes, violence like this happens, and it is terrible when it does. But most people trust that justice will be carried out if the assailants are identified. A black person assaulted in a similar manner by white people in authority has no trust that the same justice will be served. In fact, if history serves as his guide, he trusts that the exact opposite will occur.
 
A common myth we hear from the left is "This country was founded on giving the white race special advantages!" It's gotten so bad that some political "experts" on the left have been comparing leftism to a non theistic religion and "white privilege" as analogous to original sin.

So, do you believe the myth of white privilege? If so, why did whites set it up so that Asians make more than them?
Are whites "just smart enough" to keep blacks down but "just dumb enough" to not keep Asians down?

If anything, "Asian privilege" seems much more apt.
How many Asian billionaires in the US?
 
Who says that?

If you don't know that the left runs around screaming, "White privilege!" then you just don't follow politics enough.

This is equivalent to a person asking, "Who's The Beatles?" when discussing music.

I follow politics enough. Sounds like you mean I don't follow right wing propaganda enough.

So is there an actual link to this so called "screaming"?
 
It’s not possible for a conservative to think another human may have things that are not in their control to have an effect on their well being.

They wouldn’t be a conservative if they did.

That's not true at all. I've never seen a conservative yelling at a disabled man in a wheelchair to start walking.

We just think "white privilege" is some nonsense buzzphrase used in today's victim culture to make whites feel bad about being white, which is an example of racism.

Not true at all? That’s a core belief in conservative philosophy. Individualism. “All you got to do is work hard and success will come. People on the streets? Lazy bums got what they deserve.”

What’s telling here is that you can’t identify disadvantage unless you can see it with your own eyes, like the wheelchair. If it’s not in your direct line of vision it doesn’t exist.
 
A common myth we hear from the left is "This country was founded on giving the white race special advantages!" It's gotten so bad that some political "experts" on the left have been comparing leftism to a non theistic religion and "white privilege" as analogous to original sin.

So, do you believe the myth of white privilege? If so, why did whites set it up so that Asians make more than them?
Are whites "just smart enough" to keep blacks down but "just dumb enough" to not keep Asians down?

If anything, "Asian privilege" seems much more apt.

No one truly claims that the sole purpose of our founders was to give whites a privilege. 18th century educated men didn’t think about race like we do. So no, the country wasn’t founded to establish white privilege. But don’t use that fact to distort our history which clearly has established white privilege at various points. Our founders were not particularly homogeneous people. They were, without exception, White male anglo Saxon Protestants (nominally if not in actual belief). No Jews, no Asians, no Catholics, and certainly no blacks. At various points in our history when others have sought the same benefits that they said was available to all, they fought vehemently to deny them. When Catholics started arriving in droves from Ireland, they were clearly not welcomed, and violently repressed. When Asians first immigrated to the US, they were barely recognized as humans. White privileged clearly continues to this day. I see it in action every day in the southeast. To deny it is just flat out perverse.
 
It’s not possible for a conservative to think another human may have things that are not in their control to have an effect on their well being.

They wouldn’t be a conservative if they did.

That's not true at all. I've never seen a conservative yelling at a disabled man in a wheelchair to start walking.

We just think "white privilege" is some nonsense buzzphrase used in today's victim culture to make whites feel bad about being white, which is an example of racism.

So you don't believe that whites ever enjoyed an advantage over blacks due to being white? In the entire history of the US?

If the idea that whites enjoyed some advantage over minorities by instituting racial inequality and injustice toward them is a recent product of the leftists just to make white racists feel bad, why on earth does it make you feel bad?

Especially, as someone who doesn't believe that whites gained any advantages over blacks in 300 years of slavery and a hundred years of Jim Crow, as in they were just joking, those people don't know how to take a joke!
 
Here is what you are missing. If those gang members are identified they will be arrested, charged, and most likely convicted and do hard time. Now, contrast that with what would happen in the exact same circumstances if the man were black, and those beating him were wearing Police uniforms. The only one arrested would be the black man. None of the assailants would be charged or convicted of anything.

Yes, violence like this happens, and it is terrible when it does. But most people trust that justice will be carried out if the assailants are identified. A black person assaulted in a similar manner by white people in authority has no trust that the same justice will be served. In fact, if history serves as his guide, he trusts that the exact opposite will occur.

Of course they will be arrested! The point is that the mainstream media does not cover this story because it was a gang of Somalian black immigrants beating up a white man. The media is pushing the narrative that all the immigrants are "good people" who just want a chance in the U.S. CNN didn't dissect this story for hours on end like they do when white men commit crimes agianst blacks! That is the liberal hypocrisy! Black-on-white crime is ignored while white-on-black crime is discussed until the cows come home.

It's not just about making arrests. It's about the media being liberally biased to push their own agenda for brainwashing.
 
So you don't believe that whites ever enjoyed an advantage over blacks due to being white? In the entire history of the US?

If the idea that whites enjoyed some advantage over minorities by instituting racial inequality and injustice toward them is a recent product of the leftists just to make white racists feel bad, why on earth does it make you feel bad?

Especially, as someone who doesn't believe that whites gained any advantages over blacks in 300 years of slavery and a hundred years of Jim Crow, as in they were just joking, those people don't know how to take a joke!

My point is that I do agree that white people do enjoy positions of power and wealth. However, these people are elected to the government by the people! White men in power? Don't vote for white men. It's simple. You can't have people voting for white men and then say, "This country has white privilege!" It's not white men's fault that women don't want to run for office more often. How else do they expect to get elected? It's not white men's fault that blacks or Latinos don't run for office as often as white men do. Blame the other races and women for not running enough.

People act like these whites just stormed the government and sat in office with no elections.
 
People act like these whites just stormed the government and sat in office with no elections.

The earliest ones ....... kinda did. You started this thread by claiming the USA wasn't built on white privilege. It clearly was.

If your point is that today white privilege isn't a thing, that's a more saleable claim.
 
Things that make it easier to run for positions of power: money, connections, family ties, education, two parents, money, access to public services, nutritious meals, free time, money, and money.

Things that white people disproportionately have due to generations of privilege: money, connections, family ties, education, two parents, money, access to public services, nutritious meals, free time, money, and money.
 
Things that make it easier to run for positions of power: money, connections, family ties, education, two parents, money, access to public services, nutritious meals, free time, money, and money.

Things that white people disproportionately have due to generations of privilege: money, connections, family ties, education, two parents, money, access to public services, nutritious meals, free time, money, and money.

But what about all the white people who make the jokes, "My white privilege alarm goes off 6 days a week at 4:30 A.M.!" When whites are working their hands to the bone and they hear entitled leftists screaming about "white privilege," of course they are going to think they are crazy and insane and it will make them mad.

As I said numerous times before, I knew a white guy (no disabilities or mental problems) who was a cashier at McDonald's at age 40. He would laugh in your face about "white privilege."
 
Things that make it easier to run for positions of power: money, connections, family ties, education, two parents, money, access to public services, nutritious meals, free time, money, and money.

Things that white people disproportionately have due to generations of privilege: money, connections, family ties, education, two parents, money, access to public services, nutritious meals, free time, money, and money.

But what about all the white people who make the jokes, "My white privilege alarm goes off 6 days a week at 4:30 A.M.!" When whites are working their hands to the bone and they hear entitled leftists screaming about "white privilege," of course they are going to think they are crazy and insane and it will make them mad.
snowflake-feature_680W_JR.jpg

As I said numerous times before, I knew a white guy (no disabilities or mental problems) who was a cashier at McDonald's at age 40. He would laugh in your face about "white privilege."

You're talking about individual people, I'm talking about statistics. Without checking, what race would you say the CEO of McDonald's is? How about Burger King? Popeye's? Applebee's? Pizza Hut?

Also, you're changing the subject. Being able to vote for non-white people doesn't fix white privilege when running for office is something white people can do more easily on average.
 
Back
Top Bottom