Are you a clinical diagnostician? Any kind of doctor?
I am VERY interested in your pronouncement. Do you mind if I take it from the top?
Trausti, do you disagree that "
He has a significant following"?
Is it "unwell", in your opinion, to state that that following was "
created from propaganda" (ex. birtherism)
or that "
he uses that propaganda to threaten dissenters in his own party"?
Do you consider it "unwell" to opine that "
they therefore march in lockstep protecting him from accountability?"
I'm pretty sure you won't be able to get past these first few items, since historically your pronouncements are not worth the electrons that suffered in their making. But in fairness I wanted to give you a chance. If you can explain what is not "well" about Don's post other than that it does not meet with your approval, we could talk about that. Or, if you
can answer those simple yes/no questions we can proceed to examine the "wellness" of "
The propaganda is so powerful and extensive, using even foreign entities, that citizens cannot make informed decisions", which is a truth that is obvious to all but some deluded FOX News devotees.
Failure to do either (half expected) will be a tacit admission that you are a vacuous troll.