Pelosi: Impeachment Is Moving Forward

[blastula]

It should be pointed out that Bondi was at one time suing trump. When she was offered a generous settlement, she dropped the case.

Actually she was a prosecutor investigating the dirty Trump University. Bonespurs gave her a $25,000 campaign fund donation and she dropped the case. So she allowed herself to be bribed while working as a civil servant. A perfect lawyer for Trump.

Was someone prosecuted for this?

Still doesn't sound as bad as Bernie Sanders being kicked out of a commune in 1970 because he refused to contribute anything to it. Imagine if that was Trump. You guys would be saying, "Trump's uselessness confirmed."

wtf

Someone, please translate this jibber jabber trumpseak for me.

 

[Half-Life]

Was someone prosecuted for this?

Still doesn't sound as bad as Bernie Sanders being kicked out of a commune in 1970 because he refused to contribute anything to it. Imagine if that was Trump. You guys would be saying, "Trump's uselessness confirmed."

wtf

Someone, please translate this jibber jabber trumpseak for me.

A woman thought $25,000 was more worth it than exposing Trump University? And you blame Trump instead of her?

Wow..just wow...
As my father said growing up, "the person offering the bribe is not the bad guy. The person accepting it is the bad guy. They are making the conscious choice to put money over their findings."

 

[Patooka]

Was someone prosecuted for this?

Still doesn't sound as bad as Bernie Sanders being kicked out of a commune in 1970 because he refused to contribute anything to it. Imagine if that was Trump. You guys would be saying, "Trump's uselessness confirmed."

wtf

Someone, please translate this jibber jabber trumpseak for me.

"Can't argue the point so I'n going to dangle something shiny?"

 

[Patooka]

Was someone prosecuted for this?

Still doesn't sound as bad as Bernie Sanders being kicked out of a commune in 1970 because he refused to contribute anything to it. Imagine if that was Trump. You guys would be saying, "Trump's uselessness confirmed."

wtf

Someone, please translate this jibber jabber trumpseak for me.

A woman thought $25,000 was more worth it than exposing Trump University? And you blame Trump instead of her?

Wow..just wow...

That's not what anyone is saying. What is being said is Pam Bondi is corrupt and has a certain ethical flexibility that Trump appears to attract. See? No mention of Bernie required. And if you believe Trump doesn't attract lawyers that have ambiguous values, raise your hand. I'll explain it to you.

 

[blastula]

A woman thought $25,000 was more worth it than exposing Trump University? And you blame Trump instead of her?

Wow..just wow...
As my father said growing up, "the person offering the bribe is not the bad guy. The person accepting it is the bad guy. They are making the conscious choice to put money over their findings."

Hey Eric, that you?

 

[Worldtraveller]

A woman thought $25,000 was more worth it than exposing Trump University? And you blame Trump instead of her?

Wow..just wow...

That's not what anyone is saying. What is being said is Pam Bondi is corrupt and has a certain ethical flexibility that Trump appears to attract. See? No mention of Bernie required. And if you believe Trump doesn't attract lawyers that have ambiguous values, raise your hand. I'll explain it to you.

Implicit here in HL's reply is that bribery is totally fine "if it's worth it".

That's a good xian right there.

 

[Half-Life]

A woman thought $25,000 was more worth it than exposing Trump University? And you blame Trump instead of her?

Wow..just wow...

That's not what anyone is saying. What is being said is Pam Bondi is corrupt and has a certain ethical flexibility that Trump appears to attract. See? No mention of Bernie required. And if you believe Trump doesn't attract lawyers that have ambiguous values, raise your hand. I'll explain it to you.

Implicit here in HL's reply is that bribery is totally fine "if it's worth it".

That's a good xian right there.

I never said that! I said that SHE thought bribery was fine because she took the bribe. All she had to do was say, "No."

It's just like the people who blame cigarette companies for people smoking cigs, or people blaming McDonald's for making them fat. No one forces anyone to buy cigarettes or McDonald's.

 

[Patooka]

Implicit here in HL's reply is that bribery is totally fine "if it's worth it".

That's a good xian right there.

I never said that! I said that SHE thought bribery was fine because she took the bribe. All she had to do was say, "No."

It's just like the people who blame cigarette companies for people smoking cigs, or people blaming McDonald's for making them fat. No one forces anyone to buy cigarettes or McDonald's.

And now she is defending Trump. These are the very fine people Trump surrounds himself with. People who don't believe in anything; everything has a price. Why are you comfortable with that?

 

[Keith&Co.]

Was someone prosecuted for this?

Still doesn't sound as bad as Bernie Sanders being kicked out of a commune in 1970 because he refused to contribute anything to it. Imagine if that was Trump. You guys would be saying, "Trump's uselessness confirmed."

wtf

Someone, please translate this jibber jabber trumpseak for me.

A woman thought $25,000 was more worth it than exposing Trump University? And you blame Trump instead of her?

well, yes. The FLORIDA PROSECUTOR chose to drop the state of Florida out if a class-action suit against Trump University. So all his Florida victims got bupkes, while SHE got a bribe.

Wow..just wow...
As my father said growing up, "the person offering the bribe is not the bad guy. The person accepting it is the bad guy. They are making the conscious choice to put money over their findings."

actually, they can both be the bad guy.

 

[Half-Life]

Implicit here in HL's reply is that bribery is totally fine "if it's worth it".

That's a good xian right there.

I never said that! I said that SHE thought bribery was fine because she took the bribe. All she had to do was say, "No."

It's just like the people who blame cigarette companies for people smoking cigs, or people blaming McDonald's for making them fat. No one forces anyone to buy cigarettes or McDonald's.

And now she is defending Trump. These are the very fine people Trump surrounds himself with. People who don't believe in anything; everything has a price. Why are you comfortable with that?

What do you mean, "people who don't believe in anything?" We believe in freedom. Believe me, I tried to understand leftism. But, it's all about stealing from people because you are jealous of how successful other people are. People in this country who own businesses do not want their workers to seize their business and take all their profits. That is selfish and unfair. The guy who spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to open up a McDonald's should just give his profits to the workers who work at the business he opened up? How asinine is this?

Then we have anarchists who believe in no government. Then you ask them, "What happens to social security, medicaid, etc if there's no government?" They become speechless.

Leftism in all its forms is a dead ideology that brings nothing to the table.

 

[Keith&Co.]

And now she is defending Trump. These are the very fine people Trump surrounds himself with. People who don't believe in anything; everything has a price. Why are you comfortable with that?

What do you mean, "people who don't believe in anything?" We believe in freedom. Believe me, I tried to understand leftism. But, it's all about stealing from people because you are jealous of how successful other people are. People in this country who own businesses do not want their workers to seize their business and take all their profits. That is selfish and unfair. The guy who spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to open up a McDonald's should just give his profits to the workers who work at the business he opened up? How asinine is this?

Then we have anarchists who believe in no government. Then you ask them, "What happens to social security, medicaid, etc if there's no government?" They become speechless.

Leftism in all its forms is a dead ideology that brings nothing to the table.

Nice story. Needs more steampunk.

Anyway, why do you bitch about a President who lied about consensual sex, but don't complain about a President who bribed a state official, or that state official? Why pretend to morals if you're just going to toe the party line for party sake?

 

[Half-Life]

And now she is defending Trump. These are the very fine people Trump surrounds himself with. People who don't believe in anything; everything has a price. Why are you comfortable with that?

What do you mean, "people who don't believe in anything?" We believe in freedom. Believe me, I tried to understand leftism. But, it's all about stealing from people because you are jealous of how successful other people are. People in this country who own businesses do not want their workers to seize their business and take all their profits. That is selfish and unfair. The guy who spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to open up a McDonald's should just give his profits to the workers who work at the business he opened up? How asinine is this?

Then we have anarchists who believe in no government. Then you ask them, "What happens to social security, medicaid, etc if there's no government?" They become speechless.

Leftism in all its forms is a dead ideology that brings nothing to the table.

Nice story. Needs more steampunk.

Anyway, why do you bitch about a President who lied about consensual sex, but don't complain about a President who bribed a state official, or that state official? Why pretend to morals if you're just going to toe the party line for party sake?

I'd need more info. Was this brought up at the impeachment trial?

Also, delaying funds for Ukraine was not a crime. It was released before the deadline. Looking into Corruption is expected especially if if is affecting USA Tax Payers. If you pay attention over the next few days you will be hearing much more about it at the BS Impeachment, just before the President is totally exonerated.

Obama withheld aid to Egypt. Of course Dems say "That was different!" We see this impeachment is obviously partisan.

 

[steve_bank]

I

know you guys think Bolton has a bombshell. But, I hate to break it to you guys. If you're trying to sell a book, you have to make it juicy

That is Trump's modus operandi. His book is essentially bullshit. He is a chronic liar.

Trump sued a reporter for defamation for calling out his lies and fakery, making things up. In a video legal deposition under oath he acknowledged that is what he does. If he is worth 50 million he'll say 100 million. He has lost any ability to be honest.

When things go wrong with his decisions it somebody else's fault.

He is utterly corrupt.

Trump admitted to slander?

Who did Trump slander?

He sued a reporter for slander. Under oath he admitted he routinely exaggerates and makes things up. The reporter had it all documented. Trumps lost the suit.'

As to CNN both FOX and MSNBC are equally opinionated and biased. CNN is somewhere in-between on the left.

What FOX does that neither MSNBC nor CNN does is create and push fake news. It is blatant on FOX..

 

[Half-Life]

Trump admitted to slander?

Who did Trump slander?

He sued a reporter for slander. Under oath he admitted he routinely exaggerates and makes things up. The reporter had it all documented. Trumps lost the suit.'

As to CNN both FOX and MSNBC are equally opinionated and biased. CNN is somewhere in-between on the left.

What FOX does that neither MSNBC nor CNN does is create and push fake news. It is blatant on FOX..

What FOX does is report the news from the other side. Since most people just read leftist newsites, of course they will bash Trump. They are leftist. That's their job. If they supported Trump, they wouldn't be a leftist site. No matter what, they have to come up with dirt on Trump and spin things. Everything that came out about Trump was the "final straw that will sink him." First it was an access Hollywood report that was supposed to sink him. It did nothing. Then it was the Mueller Report. It did nothing. Then it was supposed to be NY Times releasing his taxes revealing he lost billions in a decade that was supposed to sink him (which he already admitted to losing on the Apprentice over a decade ago) Nothing happened.Then it was the killing of Solemani that was supposed to start WW3. Nothing happened. Then it was supposed to be the impeachment that sinks him. Did nothing. Then, it's supposed to be Bernie who will sink him. When that fails, don't get mad. Trump is one of the most attacked Presidents in history, if not the most attacked President in history, and he's still standing smiling at the podium with thousands at his rallies.

 

[ZiprHead]

WSJ-McConnell Says GOP Doesn’t Have Votes to Block Impeachment Witnesses

 

[Keith&Co.]

Nice story. Needs more steampunk.

Anyway, why do you bitch about a President who lied about consensual sex, but don't complain about a President who bribed a state official, or that state official? Why pretend to morals if you're just going to toe the party line for party sake?

I'd need more info. Was this brought up at the impeachment trial?

yes, you need more info, and need to shut fuck up on stuff you have the ignorance of.
Such as your approval of bribing her while not knowing what she was bribed to do.

Also, delaying funds

which is a derail of this particular example of Trump's corruption

for Ukraine was not a crime.

1) yes it was
2) doesn't even have to be, still impeachable
3) thus us always the Trump progression.
Didnhappen... okay, it did but not illegal... okay illegal but everyone foes it.... Her EMails!!!

Boring.

It was released before the deadline.

it was released right after the whistleblower filed. This is vlassic hitting the brakes when the radar detector goes off....

Looking into Corruption is expected especially if if is affecting USA Tax Payers.

not if doing so violates campaign finance laws....

If you pay attention over the next few days you will be hearing much more about it at the BS Impeachment, just before the President is totally exonerated.

still a crime, even if the wallaby senate acquits.

Obama withheld aid to Egypt. Of course Dems say "That was different!" We see this impeachment is obviously partisan.

Obama did not send his personal ambulance chaser, or direct a mob hit on one of our ambassadors, or lie about the aid afterwards.

 

[ZiprHead]

 

[Half-Life]

yes, you need more info, and need to shut fuck up on stuff you have the ignorance of.
Such as your approval of bribing her while not knowing what she was bribed to do.

Also, delaying funds

which is a derail of this particular example of Trump's corruption

for Ukraine was not a crime.

1) yes it was
2) doesn't even have to be, still impeachable
3) thus us always the Trump progression.
Didnhappen... okay, it did but not illegal... okay illegal but everyone foes it.... Her EMails!!!

Boring.

It was released before the deadline.

it was released right after the whistleblower filed. This is vlassic hitting the brakes when the radar detector goes off....

Looking into Corruption is expected especially if if is affecting USA Tax Payers.

not if doing so violates campaign finance laws....

If you pay attention over the next few days you will be hearing much more about it at the BS Impeachment, just before the President is totally exonerated.

still a crime, even if the wallaby senate acquits.

Obama withheld aid to Egypt. Of course Dems say "That was different!" We see this impeachment is obviously partisan.

Obama did not send his personal ambulance chaser, or direct a mob hit on one of our ambassadors, or lie about the aid afterwards.

Keith, you are setting terrible standards. If a Dem ever becomes President again, you guys have set a precedent that Republicans can impeach them if they saw him picking his nose, or if they don't like his shoes, or if they don't like his religion.

The dangerous precedent has been set with Trump. I would respect the Dems a whole lot more if they just said, "We have no chance of beating Trump in the 2020 election. Our only chance is to remove Trump through impeachment." It would still be downright pathetic, but at least they would be telling the truth. Get some backbone, Dems.

At least the Clinton impeachment was towards the end of his 2nd term. He couldn't be re-elected. At least you know there was integrity there.

As we've all know for years, Republicans can come together and support our President for the common good. The leftist side eats their own and engages in purity testing, woke scolding and anything else. Look at Joe Rogan endorsing Bernie Sanders. "Woke leftists" are freaking out because they don't like Rogan. This is a man who reaches MILLIONS OF VIEWERS PER MONTH ON HIS PODCAST, and they are angry Bernie is getting this kind of exposure. Leftists eat their own, Republicans all gather for dinner together.

 

[Patooka]

Keith, you are setting terrible standards. If a Dem ever becomes President again, you guys have set a precedent that Republicans can impeach them if they saw him picking his nose, or if they don't like his shoes, or if they don't like his religion.

That has been the case since at least the 8th of October, 1998. You know, when Dershowitz, Starr and Graham all believed that a President didn't need to commit a crime to be impeached. Or did you forget that precedent?

The dangerous precedent has been set with Trump. I would respect the Dems a whole lot more if they just said, "We have no chance of beating Trump in the 2020 election. Our only chance is to remove Trump through impeachment." It would still be downright pathetic, but at least they would be telling the truth. Get some backbone, Dems.

I'd have a lot more respect if Republicans grew some fucking balls and said, "Even a President should be held accountable for their actions." And you're right, a dangerous precedent is being set here. The next time a Democrat is voted in, they are allowed to use the State Department to smear political rivals, completely ignore anything Congress does (divine rule in other words) and basically use the Executive office to line their own pockets without fear of consequence. You seem to be fine with that. Most people aren't, however

At least the Clinton impeachment was towards the end of his 2nd term. He couldn't be re-elected. At least you know there was integrity there.

What the fuck does timing have to do with anything? If someone is being corrupt at their job you call them out on it. You don't fucking wait until their contract expires. That is how you define integrity, what the fuck is wrong with you?

As we've all know for years, Republicans can come together and support our President for the common good. The leftist side eats their own and engages in purity testing, woke scolding and anything else. Look at Joe Rogan endorsing Bernie Sanders. "Woke leftists" are freaking out because they don't like Rogan. This is a man who reaches MILLIONS OF VIEWERS PER MONTH ON HIS PODCAST, and they are angry Bernie is getting this kind of exposure. Leftists eat their own, Republicans all gather for dinner together.

My party, right or wrong. You seem proud of that stance. Would you like to know some historical examples where that doesn't end well? I can list a few if you like.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Keith, you are setting terrible standards. If a Dem ever becomes President again, you guys have set a precedent that Republicans can impeach them if they saw him picking his nose, or if they don't like his shoes, or if they don't like his religion.

and you forgot the 25 years the GOP have been hounding Hillary just for being Hillary...and despite everything, they still cannot find an actual crime.
Trump, on the other hand, has committed actual crimes. We all saw him doit on television.
He has admitted to fraud.
He has admitted to embezzling charity donations.
So, yeah, fuck him. Let the record show this charlatan was only tolerated by The Right.

The dangerous precedent has been set with Trump. I would respect the Dems a whole lot more if they just said, "We have no chance of beating Trump in the 2020 election. Our only chance is to remove Trump through impeachment."

so, you would respect The Dems, if they were to become GOP parrots and repeat FOX lies?
Uh.... i think we will pass on that.

It would still be downright pathetic, but at least they would be telling the truth. Get some backbone, Dems.

uh huh....

At least the Clinton impeachment was towards the end of his 2nd term. He couldn't be re-elected. At least you know there was integrity there.

you also forget how each GOP celebrity has done a complete 180 on the Constitution, crimes, witnesses, and the integrity of the process.

As we've all know for years, Republicans can come together and support our President for the common good.

nope. For their own power. Not the commoners.
Check soybean sales this year?