laughing dog
Contributor
Well, that is a matter of opinion. According to herI am confident in my opinion that it is possible that her negligence on the prevention of the gap is due to human fallibility not hypocrisy. Being intimate or ignorant of her views has nothing whatsoever to do with that.This is a situation that I find rather confusing. I get that a whole lot of it is nothing more than knee-jerk opposition to whatever Met says. But step back for a moment and think about this: you, LD, Jarhyn, and several others in this thread have straight up said you don't know anything about DiAngelo or her work or her philosophy. You haven't gone and looked into it to form your own opinion, and seem to have no intention of doing so.
Frankly, anyone who seriously claims (as opposed to hyperbole) that all interactions are racist is too far gone to bother with. Anyone who seriously claims that blacks cannot afford to believe in meritocracy is too far gone to bother with - even within the black community, there is an observable meritocracy.
Sure, it's possible that it's human fallibility. I'd give that a lot more credence and weight if she herself considered human fallibility an acceptable excuse in any situation... but she doesn't.
DiAngelo falls pretty firmly into your second paragraph. It's the combination of that outlook, paired with her lecturing that white people need to actively identify and call out and take direct action when there are inequities (because they're all caused by racism) that makes her lack of action in this case fall into the bucket of hypocrisy for me. It's that she makes a high-income living out of telling white people that they should be doing the thing that she herself did NOT do.
“I read that you make $30,000 per speaking engagement”
(source: https://www.robindiangelo.com/accountability-statement).The statement published in the Washington Free Beacon article that I make 30k per engagement is enormously misleading. Fees are rarely fixed; they rise and fall based on the type of organization and fluctuations in demand. My fee is on a sliding scale; I am paid more by corporate orgs, and much less by non-profits, particularly non-profits that are focused on anti-racist work and/or are BIPOC-led. I also do a lot of reduced-rate, pro bono, and fundraising work. My average fee for an event in 2018 was $6,200. In 2019, it was $9,200. In 2020 (as of August), it has been $14,000. My fees are now negotiated by the agency that books me, and they take a percentage of the fees they negotiate. And again, I am donating 15% of my income.
I am an independent contractor and not employed by any institution. I am taxed at a combined rate of 35% (Federal income tax, payroll taxes and State excise tax). This year thus far, with the popularity of my book and more work in the corporate sector, my fee has ranged from pro bono (zero) to upwards of $30,000, which is well within the standard range for a best-selling author who is in high demand. The higher fees allow me to donate more, do more pro bono work, and request that corporations who hire me donate to a racial justice organization led by people of Color. This is not to minimize my income but to provide some perspective.
Beacon Press, my publisher, is a non-profit press specializing in social justice books. My royalties on White Fragility are 7.5 percent (agents receive 15% of a book’s royalties).
These are, of course, uncomfortable questions to be asked. If I wrote about any other social phenomenon and did not include how racism shapes that phenomenon – which would be a serious omission reinforcing whiteness – I would likely not be asked what I do with my income. We might also ask the same questions of those who do not seek to challenge racism in their work.
And, I found this more interesting -
(source - same as above).“Why did you change the information that was on the Accountability page of your website?”
I had listed out all the organizations that benefited financially from my fundraising and donations during 2019 and 2020, but the Washington Free Beacon journalist began to contact these organizations and ask them to verify my donations. I am a private citizen and organizations are not obligated to release who their donors are or how much they donate, and they declined to do so. Further, many of the donations from fund-raising events came through the sponsoring org – Education for Racial Equity – so my name would not be listed as the donor. Declining to reveal my name and amount of donations was used by this journalist to suggest that I was lying about my donations because organizations “did not confirm.”
Further, this journalist was contacting these organizations at the same time that my daughter and I were being doxed by the far-right. Her name, address and relation to me was published on Twitter and members of my family were being emailed and harassed. Pictures and stories about me taken from my husband’s personal website were being circulated. In a panic we removed any information that was open to trolling and harassment. My husband took his website down and made his IG private, and we took the names of organizations benefitting from my fundraising off my website. This level of visibility and the daily hate mail and physical threats that go with it are new to me and I am doing my best to respond with transparency while also keeping myself, my family, and the organizations associated with me safe. Unfortunately, the journalist framed this as “scrubbing” my website.
We have now made the information regarding donations available in the following ways: The list of organizations benefiting from funds raised from my public workshops is available on ERE’s website. The list of organizations to which I donate directly are listed above, in the “What do you do with your income?” section. It is up to readers whether they believe I would lie about this.
I guess I am more forgiving about human fallibility on non-lethal issues like these than some.