• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

White Villa Duchesne student and parents accuse school of discrimination

Metaphor

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
12,378
From https://www.stltoday.com/news/local...cle_ff6417ce-d5dc-5083-9a38-426ec91c0302.html


ST. LOUIS COUNTY — A white senior at Villa Duchesne and her parents say school officials discriminated against her by siding with Black students who called her a racist, accused her of saying “Black lives do not matter” in class, and threatened to attack her because of it.


The private Catholic school in Frontenac discriminates against white students “by encouraging and facilitating race-based aggression” by Black students, unfairly disciplining students based on race and encouraging “the concept that all Caucasians are racist by virtue of being Caucasian,” according to a lawsuit filed against the school Dec. 21 by the 18-year-old student and her parents.

“The goal is to stop the indoctrination of students with this critical race theory and to also make the community aware that even at Catholic parochial schools, this bizarre, racist, anti-racism is being force-fed down the throats of their children,” said their lawyer Mark McCloskey, who gained broad attention last summer because of a confrontation with racial justice protesters marching past his Central West End mansion. McCloskey said his daughter, now 31, is a graduate of Villa.




Critical race theory is defined broadly as an ideology that identifies examples of systemic racism. In September, President Donald Trump’s administration instructed federal agencies to halt racial sensitivity training that included “propaganda of the critical race theory movement.”


...
According to the suit, a Black Villa student in October accused the senior of standing up in class Oct. 10, pointing and shouting “Black lives do not matter!”






Three days later, the suit says, the senior reported that the Black student’s “racially charged lie” led other students to call the senior a racist and also prompted physical threats and vandalism at her home. A video recording of the Oct. 10 class for students attending virtually proves she never made the statement about Black lives, according to the suit.


The lawsuit claimed a teacher told her she should “expect to be treated like a racist” because of what the teacher described as a “Blue Lives Matter” sticker on her laptop. The sticker, according to the lawsuit, was the thin blue line flag in support of law enforcement. The suit also claim’s Villa’s principal, Steenberge, called her a racist, adding “that everyone who is white is a racist.”


“Despite permitting students and faculty to wear BLM (Black Lives Matter) insignia on campus, (the plaintiff) was told that she was, in fact, a racist for having what was inaccurately perceived to be a ‘Blue Lives Matter’ sticker on her laptop,” the lawsuit says. One of the Black students said the senior was “the biggest known racist in the school” and “in love with Trump.”






During a second meeting in October involving the senior and school leaders, a dean who is Black and “displays BLM support materials” at school, pressured the senior into declaring she felt safe at school and told her the Black students would not be disciplined for allegedly threatening her, the suit says. The plaintiffs also contend that officials demanded she admit to being a racist “by virtue of being a Caucasian.”

The allegations of the lawsuit are contained here:
https://www.stltoday.com/read-doe-e...pdf_2e8f24ab-393c-5415-bdd3-e61c0208663c.html
 
Sadly, not surprising these days. But I am sure the usual suspects will be on here momentarily to defend the school and CRT.
 
Villa Duchesne used to be for privileged white girls (I grew up in that area). The fact the attorney is that racist asshole who threatened marchers with a firearm. Both observations lead me to think that this is some white snowflake who get her privileged feelings hurt. But, who knows, maybe all of the allegations are true.
 
Villa Duchesne used to be for privileged white girls (I grew up in that area). The fact the attorney is that racist asshole who threatened marchers with a firearm. Both observations lead me to think that this is some white snowflake who get her privileged feelings hurt. But, who knows, maybe all of the allegations are true.

If the allegations of fact were true or substantially true, what do you think the repercussions on the staff and students in question should be, if any?
 
Villa Duchesne used to be for privileged white girls (I grew up in that area). The fact the attorney is that racist asshole who threatened marchers with a firearm. Both observations lead me to think that this is some white snowflake who get her privileged feelings hurt. But, who knows, maybe all of the allegations are true.

If the allegations of fact were true or substantially true, what do you think the repercussions on the staff and students in question should be, if any?
I seriously doubt they are even close to be partially true. The allegations against other students are basically bullying - something that too many students face in schools all over the world. If true, the school should treat these bullies like they treat any other bully.

The allegations - if true -against school officials should be troubling to school officials. I would worry about their professionalism and ability to deal with students. Frankly, if I were in charge, I would need to talk with them to find out more, but without any more information, my instinct would be to fire them.
 
Yes, even Catholics know how to read.

Yes, and they've been trained from birth to accept 'facts' without evidence.
Accepting "facts" without evidence is the MO of conservatives and reactionaries as well along with a large frightening portion of internet audiences.

Some people can entertain and think though scenarios without necessary believing allegations (though as I've stated elsewhere, belief is involuntary).

Even some of us raised Catholic.
 
Accepting "facts" without evidence is the MO of conservatives and reactionaries as well along with a large frightening portion of internet audiences.

Some people can entertain and think though scenarios without necessary believing allegations (though as I've stated elsewhere, belief is involuntary).

Even some of us raised Catholic.
While those people may have the capability of doing just that, many of them show little evidence of that capability.
 
Accepting "facts" without evidence is the MO of conservatives and reactionaries as well along with a large frightening portion of internet audiences.

Some people can entertain and think though scenarios without necessary believing allegations (though as I've stated elsewhere, belief is involuntary).

Even some of us raised Catholic.
While those people may have the capability of doing just that, many of them show little evidence of that capability.

Well that explains the low cognitive level necessary to believe CRT.
 
Back
Top Bottom