Esoteric Mussoliniology

[Matthew Mussolini]

Paxet Bonum!

I come in peace, not to be abrasive or offensive but to help ease suffering in our world.

Please consider this is not spamming or advertising. I'm asking moderators to let me post my YouTube's on this thread and confine them to this thread. I will never post one of my Videos outside of this thread.

It's just words on a screen to me are terrible ways to communicate. Mussolini speaks a whole sermon just with hearing strength and power and thunder in his voice, even when I don't know what he's saying.

View attachment 31445View attachment 31446

An enormous amount of a message is lost when tone of voice, body language, and facial expressions aren't there.

Most of all, I find it a total pain in the ass typing messages on a tablet. It is way WAY easier and faster to make a video.

The first lesson of wisdom from Esoteric Mussoliniology is how to love fear so that fear has no power over you. I was scared shitless of spiders growing up, and Mussolini made me hold them and force them to bite me. Now spiders have no control of me because I love the creepiest and most aggressive ones especially. In this video a pit bull spider has his fangs sunk into a nerve ending in my finger and he wont let go:



You will suffer, die , and encounter much evil. If you love suffering, dying, and encountering evil, you will be happy in all circumstances and wickedness loses it's power over you, and fear is gone:

If this thread is an abomination to the mods, then delete it, but strongly I feel it is NOT spam because I'm trying to initiate conversation about matters that can strengthen, heal, empower, enhance, and save lives.

Spam is not designed for discussion. I have an important message for the world. I was so scared of spiders growing up I dreamed of their evil eyes watching me, their fangs sinking into me, them growling, barking, hissing, and squeaking as I rip off their eight hairy legs and those wicked fangs don't come out.

Now I love Spiders. You could never make me scared of a spider. I'm totally cured. You can be cured of any fear.

I would also like to give lectures on Fascist Buddhism, the eight fold path to enlightenment with Benito the butterfly, the new creation.

I'd like to discuss Fascist mysticism and philosophies, praying for the grace to love suffering, the joy of being crucified, carrying the cross daily, finding joy in failure, humiliation, and adversity.

The soldier who doesn't mind blood guts, and explosions, and death will be the best soldier. The prisoner of a Communist gulag who loves what goes on there, will do better and survive and not be crushed with grief, fear, trauma, and despair.

But I have to have somewhere on the forum where I can share YouTube's because an enormous amount of meaning is lost when the message is simply a text. It's also way easier and quicker for me to speak into a camera.

All I ask is for one thread to do that.

If that is not okay, rather than ban me, please direct me to a website that might accept me. (Thanks) Storm front are racist bigots who I want nothing to do with.

Peace and good will to you!

 

[Lion IRC]

I'm asking moderators to let me post my YouTube's on this thread and confine them to this thread. I will never post one of my Videos outside of this thread.

Why can't we see links to your videos if we want to.

This is a freethought community.

I can post links to your videos if I want. What's the problem? They're illegal?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I'm asking moderators to let me post my YouTube's on this thread and confine them to this thread. I will never post one of my Videos outside of this thread.

Why can't we see links to your videos if we want to.

People post YouTube links all the time. The trouble is the spamming of links to a YouTube Channel in which they can get reimbursement for. TF doesn't exist so people can try to spam views.

He can always add a link without embedding videos.

 

[Keith&Co.]

An enormous amount of a message is lost when tone of voice, body language, and facial expressions aren't there.

Okay. But for discussion, we're using text to reply. Most of us here are disinterested in creating a response video, so it's going to be words coming back at you.
Might as well start there.

Can't quote 'tone of voice' in a reply. And not really interested in sittingbthru a video i have to transcribe to reply to.

 

[WAB]

An enormous amount of a message is lost when tone of voice, body language, and facial expressions aren't there.

Okay. But for discussion, we're using text to reply. Most of us here are disinterested in creating a response video, so it's going to be words coming back at you.
Might as well start there.

Can't quote 'tone of voice' in a reply. And not really interested in sittingbthru a video i have to transcribe to reply to.

Agreed. I don't think we need videos, and besides, any poster here interested in seeing this person's videos is free to go to the proper venue(s) to see them.

I must admit, I am still a bit suspicious. Having an avowed fascist here, at this time, seems strange, odds-wise at least. I have to wonder if it's not a sock of an entrenched member at TFT, trying to see if there are any actual fascists about who might be emboldened to admit it if there were at least one member who could admit it and not be immediately dog-piled and banned. Mod or admin perhaps, so they could see private messages?

Sorry for the paranoia, but I believe it's warranted nowadays.

(Not-a -fascist, Just-a-moderate-with-left-and-right-leaning views)

 

[Keith&Co.]

That would explain a lot. A fake fascist wouldn't have to talk the talk in real time if he could just meme the party lines in prepackaged vids.

On the other hand, might as well take it at face-value unless and until he starts contradicting himself. Like calling himself a polytheist Christain or something like that.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

I miss our misunderstood fascist.

 

[Lion IRC]

I'm asking moderators to let me post my YouTube's on this thread and confine them to this thread. I will never post one of my Videos outside of this thread.

Why can't we see links to your videos if we want to.

People post YouTube links all the time. The trouble is the spamming of links to a YouTube Channel in which they can get reimbursement for. TF doesn't exist so people can try to spam views.

He can always add a link without embedding videos.

Spam is in the eye of the beholder.

argumentum ad youtubeum doesn't do it for me. I won't run off and spend an hour watching a video which allegedly includes all the winning arguments my interlocutor cant/wont summarise.

But dismissing a YouTube link as spam because you're too lazy to summarise your position isn't much different.

Matthew Mussolini isn't short of words. He doesn't seem like a hit-and-run spammer. He isnt floundering and doesn't appear to be intensely frustrated by anyones disinterest in his video sources. Watch them. Don't watch them. Decide for yourself. #Free _Thought. He doesn't seem fixated on getting folks to actually watch them. He's just (quite reasonably) claiming that additional supporting video links ought to be allowed - whether they be pro or anti Mussolini.

 

[Matthew Mussolini]

That would explain a lot. A fake fascist wouldn't have to talk the talk in real time if he could just meme the party lines in prepackaged vids.

On the other hand, might as well take it at face-value unless and until he starts contradicting himself. Like calling himself a polytheist Christain or something like that.

Christianity is kind of a Polytheism Religion.

Jesus said of human beings "you are gods", and so did the Old Testament, indicating that human beings can become Divinities.

That doesn't make them creators of Heaven and earth, but Christ and Paul indicate that a Deification of a person is possible. Paul said "it is no longer I who live but Christ".

 

[Matthew Mussolini]

People post YouTube links all the time. The trouble is the spamming of links to a YouTube Channel in which they can get reimbursement for. TF doesn't exist so people can try to spam views.

He can always add a link without embedding videos.

Spam is in the eye of the beholder.

argumentum ad youtubeum doesn't do it for me. I won't run off and spend an hour watching a video which allegedly includes all the winning arguments my interlocutor cant/wont summarise.

But dismissing a YouTube link as spam because you're too lazy to summarise your position isn't much different.

Matthew Mussolini isn't short of words. He doesn't seem like a hit-and-run spammer. He isnt floundering and doesn't appear to be intensely frustrated by anyones disinterest in his video sources. Watch them. Don't watch them. Decide for yourself. #Free _Thought. He doesn't seem fixated on getting folks to actually watch them. He's just (quite reasonably) claiming that additional supporting video links ought to be allowed - whether they be pro or anti Mussolini.

Amen! You are exactly correct. If you go to my introduction post I have written about 40 texts, some of them very long, and do my best to not be a hit and run guy. The videos, I do not get paid for, no matter how many people view them.

Spam as a general rule is not interested in discussion.

But like my pets, it's fun to share them via video:

 

[Matthew Mussolini]

I miss our misunderstood fascist.

I was just busy at another thread.

Let me know if my Fascist song has potential:

 

[Matthew Mussolini]

Anyway, in this YouTube I explain that Mussolini loved the Jews.



No, I don't expect anyone to watch it, neither to I pressure anyone to.

 

[ideologyhunter]

Take a bike ride. The fresh air may waft away Mussolini.
Give a dog a biscuit. Its warm eyes will not reference Mussolini.
Read some Mark Twain. His sentences are beautiful and he doesn't posture on balconies with his hands on his hips.
Get a nice cup of coffee with cream. Exchange pleasantries with the other customers. Do not bring up the 1922 March on Rome unless the other customers do.
Have some pizza, but while looking at your slice, try not to picture Benito and Clara hanging upside down in Milan at the gas station.
Watch an old Whoopi Goldberg movie. No. On second thought, you could read about Mussolini instead of watching Whoopi.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

People post YouTube links all the time. The trouble is the spamming of links to a YouTube Channel in which they can get reimbursement for. TF doesn't exist so people can try to spam views.

He can always add a link without embedding videos.

Spam is in the eye of the beholder.

argumentum ad youtubeum doesn't do it for me. I won't run off and spend an hour watching a video which allegedly includes all the winning arguments my interlocutor cant/wont summarise.

But dismissing a YouTube link as spam because you're too lazy to summarise your position isn't much different.

Almost all arguments get defaulted to ignored if the defense of said argument is almost exclusively a video, forget if someone is self-promoting which almost immediately renders it as unsolicited spam.

*We now return to The Brady Bunch*

 

[Lion IRC]

Jesse James ~ Mussolini?
Brady Bunch episode ~ YouTube?
Spam is OK if it assists in establishing the factum historicum?

...I give up.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

I miss our misunderstood fascist.

I was just busy at another thread.

Let me know if my Fascist song has potential:

I didn't watch the video but from the words on the preview I can see a big problem:

One claim is 1 in 4 will be raped.

The other claim is sexual assaults increase 500%.

Note how they are referring to different things--sexual assault covers a lot more than rape. There's also a little detail--Sweden revised it's rules, more acts now fall under the category of "sexual assault", of course the number increased! (And beware, plenty of sources make this same mistaken equivalency as Swedish law has the same basic category to apply to all of them and it's often translated as "rape" but that is not correct.)

 

[Matthew Mussolini]

I miss our misunderstood fascist.

I was just busy at another thread.

Let me know if my Fascist song has potential:

I didn't watch the video but from the words on the preview I can see a big problem:

One claim is 1 in 4 will be raped.

The other claim is sexual assaults increase 500%.

Note how they are referring to different things--sexual assault covers a lot more than rape. There's also a little detail--Sweden revised it's rules, more acts now fall under the category of "sexual assault", of course the number increased! (And beware, plenty of sources make this same mistaken equivalency as Swedish law has the same basic category to apply to all of them and it's often translated as "rape" but that is not correct.)

Okay