untermensche
Contributor
You can describe experiences of the brain.
You can't tell me what it does beyond saying it responds reflexively.
You think energy has information about color in it.
You think the isomerization of retinal can somehow transmit that information.
You are about as lost as one can be.
Energy has information about color r is nonsense, no one said that.
Maybe you never did but the person I was talking to thinks that energy transmits information about color to the nervous system and vibrating air transmits information about sound to the nervous system.
And they claim to have done research on the nervous system.
Bad assumptions make for bad conclusions.
What was said is that we classify wavelengths of lvisible light and assign arbitrary words like blue to specific wavelengths.
Some do that too. It is just as irrational.
The stimulus for the brain to create the experience for color is merely the stimulus.
If you classify it rationally you do not say the energy is blue you say the colorless invisible energy is the stimulus for the brain to create the experience of blue.
The energy is correlated to an experience. It not blue in any way.
The eye and brain discarnate between color regardless of what we call the light.
"discarnate" ? I'll assume you mean discriminate and are too rude to care how badly you are communicating.
Cells in the retina have mechanisms that respond to the isomerization of retinal. This is what cells have evolved mechanisms to react to. Not the energy that transformed the molecule.
When millions of retinal molecules are transformed from cis to trans the brain has mechanisms that reflexively turns that information into the many colors we experience.