steve_bank
Diabetic retinopathy and poor eyesight. Typos ...
If we are made in god's image, then I assume god has a penis. But what aboput a vagina? Id hgod both male and female? Hmmmm....
A lot comes down to the definition of the word "can't" because when one discusses "simulation creator" gods, with omniscience and omnipotence, there are three definitions.God has a penis so large, even he can't lift it.
I don't think there is any mention of a penis on God in the Bible, but as I recall, there is a passage in Genesis where Adam is walking around the Garden of Eden one day and catches a quick glimpse of God's ass. So, there's that.
The basic problem here is simple. Any definition of an omnipotent entity which created the universe as we perceive, means by that definition, it will be something humans cannot grasp. The result is, any human's concept of such an entity will contain contradictions and paradoxes. These contradictions and paradoxes are the subject of arguments between humans and none can have any bearing on the nature of an omnipotent entity.....
you'll have to be a bit more specific
You significantly underestimate the grasp of humans.The basic problem here is simple. Any definition of an omnipotent entity which created the universe as we perceive, means by that definition, it will be something humans cannot grasp. The result is, any human's concept of such an entity will contain contradictions and paradoxes. These contradictions and paradoxes are the subject of arguments between humans and none can have any bearing on the nature of an omnipotent entity.....
you'll have to be a bit more specific
To put it specifically, no matter how wrong any human maybe in their concept of God, it has no bearing on whether God does, or doesn't exist.
I will observe, if there is a God, He(PYP) certainly seems to have a proclivity for watching people catch other people in an error.
Okay. So by your math, is it possible to describe a penis so large that God can't lift it?You significantly underestimate the grasp of humans.The basic problem here is simple. Any definition of an omnipotent entity which created the universe as we perceive, means by that definition, it will be something humans cannot grasp. The result is, any human's concept of such an entity will contain contradictions and paradoxes. These contradictions and paradoxes are the subject of arguments between humans and none can have any bearing on the nature of an omnipotent entity.....
you'll have to be a bit more specific
To put it specifically, no matter how wrong any human maybe in their concept of God, it has no bearing on whether God does, or doesn't exist.
I will observe, if there is a God, He(PYP) certainly seems to have a proclivity for watching people catch other people in an error.
First: any system can emulate any other system as long as it is turning complete. It does not matter whether it has a hyper-penis or whatever. I can say quite certainly that regardless of whether or not a creator god might exist, my views on it contain zero paradoxes or contradictions because...
My views of what gods CAN be and CAN do and the ways in which they CAN exist are based directly on example, and the implications this produces, including the implication that, like a Boltzmann Brain, it could just happen as a result of random chance.
Assuming the universe contains no real paradoxes or contradictions, observations of the metaphysics of this relationship would both hold and transfer to any universe bound to behave as "describable by math".
As I said, it depends on the context of the question. "Yes, no, yes."Okay. So by your math, is it possible to describe a penis so large that God can't lift it?You significantly underestimate the grasp of humans.The basic problem here is simple. Any definition of an omnipotent entity which created the universe as we perceive, means by that definition, it will be something humans cannot grasp. The result is, any human's concept of such an entity will contain contradictions and paradoxes. These contradictions and paradoxes are the subject of arguments between humans and none can have any bearing on the nature of an omnipotent entity.....
you'll have to be a bit more specific
To put it specifically, no matter how wrong any human maybe in their concept of God, it has no bearing on whether God does, or doesn't exist.
I will observe, if there is a God, He(PYP) certainly seems to have a proclivity for watching people catch other people in an error.
First: any system can emulate any other system as long as it is turning complete. It does not matter whether it has a hyper-penis or whatever. I can say quite certainly that regardless of whether or not a creator god might exist, my views on it contain zero paradoxes or contradictions because...
My views of what gods CAN be and CAN do and the ways in which they CAN exist are based directly on example, and the implications this produces, including the implication that, like a Boltzmann Brain, it could just happen as a result of random chance.
Assuming the universe contains no real paradoxes or contradictions, observations of the metaphysics of this relationship would both hold and transfer to any universe bound to behave as "describable by math".