In real science, one is required to model exactly how some force does what it does. So exactly how does this "intelligence" alter the genes from one generation to the next so that new traits are acquired?
Before I answer, will you denounce and accept that the evolution is wrong and not part of science? If not, I cannot give you new explanations.
He has to denounce evolution before you give him a reason to?
I give all of you a simple challenge above (if you read it, if not, oh you are probably lazy), a comparison of two models: evolution and interrelation. Since you cannot answer, which means evolution is wrong and not part of science. Which is easier for you all? Fight and answer my challenge squarely or denounce Evolution? Choose and let us discuss.
My goodness, do I have to spoon-feed you every time?
Now tell me, is the change intentional or not? is the change guided or not? A or B, which? Why you say it and what is your experiment to show (I need to test a claim or shut up), no test , no science, agree? PLEASE, to all supporters of evolution, solve or answer that simple request and show me that I am wrong.
For me, the new ID, the change is guided, the test is my egg-and tissue experiment (ohh sorry, you are lazy to read my science books) and my thought experiment (ohh, sorry you are lazy again to read my FREE link), and the conclusion is biological interrelation (intelligently relating), not biological evolution... that is how you must answer directly. I will add, FYI, the change follows the limit of intelligence.. (ohh sorry, you are lazy to read all my links). COME HERE and I will educate and teach you real science...