It doesn't sound like a plan at all. It sounds like an emotion; To become a plan it would require a definition of 'blocking', that both expands upon the existing prohibitions on illegal parking of vehicles, and is specifically written to avoid penalising drivers for stopping in unusual circumstances for safety reasons, or due to mechanical issues - but still encompasses the behaviour you are seeking to prevent.Sounds like a good plan. I like it in general as a penalty for using your vehicle for blocking. (Don't just suspend the CDL, suspend the DL for a couple of weeks.)I think the Canadian government should just suspend the Canadian equivalent of a CDL license if a licensed driver stops their truck on a public road.
No force required. No infringement on anybody's liberty. People who infringe on other people's freedom and safety just lose the privilege of operating their weaponized vehicle on publicly funded roads.
Tom
Yeah, it would have to be refined. That's the job of the politicians.
If I stop in the middle of a busy freeway during peak hour and say it was because I thought a red light had appeared on my dash indicating a problem with the braking system, are you going to take my licence and livelihood away because you suspect me of having an ulterior motive?
You stopped, didn't you? You could have pulled to the shoulder in the process.
I actually have done a hard stop in a freeway lane once. There was a truck in front of me, the air disturbance it caused picked up a big piece of cardboard from the side of the road and slapped it across my windshield--no forward visibility at all. I looked to the median divider and held a constant distance from it while braking hard. (There wasn't a car beside me and the median was the best object to judge my location.)
If so, what long term impact do you think this 'good plan' will have on road safety?
This 'plan' is to allow a bureaucrat to decide in advance, in his comfortable office, that he is in a better position than the licenced operator of a heavy vehicle to decide whether it's safe and reasonable to proceed; And to impose a very significant penalty on any operator who uses his own discretion to make that call themselves in real time and considering the actual conditions in a specific case.
How are you defining 'blocking' that is different from currently unlawful parking, but doesn't limit a driver's discretion to use his professional judgment to keep himself and other road users safe?
How can any law that prohibits stopping for nefarious reasons, but doesn't limit operator discretion and judgement for safety reasons, ever be enforceable?
It's basically parking in a traffic lane.
Cop: Why are you stopped here?
Trucker: <legitimate reason> Cop verifies the situation and tells them to move it as soon as possible
Protester: <doesn't have legitimate reason> Short license suspension.
There are very few reasons to legitimately leave a vehicle in a high speed traffic lane.