A quick note, since I'm pressed for time just now: You might be wrong about our detecting changes in the sun's gravitation. Human science has had the ability to measure such things for a very short time, cosmically speaking. The duration of our ability to measure this could be used to put an...
Rhetorically, then, the answer is clearly: No.
First example I've googled up:
http://www.12news.com/news/politics/arizona-ag-says-top-elections-official-broke-law/188395426
Several other locations are also being criticized if not prosecuted for questionable practices on or leading up to their...
Ah, very good.
Classical "mass" is essentially an accounting of fermion quantity, but if we include the bosons there are considerably more units to count.
By separating mass from gravitational potential, would that allow gravity to be considered a non-conserved quantity?
I would like to better understand your thoughts.
Please elaborate on the types of particles to be counted; what particles do you propose to include?
How does counting these differ from traditional methods of gravitational potential measurement?
Slow reply, nearly killed by the flu.
I'm speculating, but the photochemical process of DVD writing might be adapted to this and then you'd have RAM not just the ROM described thus far.
Jet packs and flying cars have been flops in the mass-market, but 5-dimensional holographic memory is going to make a difference in the world.
http://www.orc.soton.ac.uk/962.html
Please quote from the document in which this admission was made. I read the doc that was made public a while back, it contained at most an admission of providing ludes and/or benedryl to women, in exchange for (or to 'enhance') sex. I predict that this will never go to court, because the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.