Derec
Contributor
They were not "observing lop-sidedness[sic]" but attacking me every time I bring up anything bad about a woman, so-called POC or a Muslim.Your stock response whenever someone observes the lop-sidedness of your particular target (blacks, or women, or Muslims, or leftists, etc...) is "Should ______ (put int the target" not be criticized".
But your comment about lopsidedness merits further discussion. Yes, there is a lopsidedness. Just like there is a lopsidedness in the choice of targets so-called progressive posters choose.
But what is the cause of that lopsidedness? It's not bias on my part. It's because for example black women are overrepresented in the Democratic Party, and especially on the far-left fringes of the Democratic Party. Just like white people are overrepresented in the GOP.
Another thing. When we talk about people in Congress, dumbfuckery is strongly correlated with ultrasafe districts. SJL represents a D+23 district, MTG represents a R+22 one. It just happens that ultrasafe districts for Democrats are almost always in urban areas and often have black representatives, just like Republican ultrasafe districts tend to be in rural areas represented by whites.
Take Georgia. Marjorie Taylor Greene is an idiot and a conspiracy theory peddler. My former representative Cynthia McKinney likewise was an idiot, conspiracy theory peddler and an outspoken antisemite. The only reason she managed to survive in Congress for as as she did was that her district is D+27. She has been replaced by a man who is not a conspiracy nut or an antisemite, but still not very bright. Here he is expressing concern that the island of Guam might capsize.
Except for the blatant race-card playing whenever someone black is criticized or ridiculed, no matter how deservedly.It is particularly blatant straw man. In this case, no no one even hinted that only white people should be criticized which makes your response epically ironic.