My view of it is: A Pox on Both Thier Houses.
Well I’ve been exhausted by this conflict for 20 years! IMO, there is no solution that will satisfy both sides. The fighting there will never permanently end.I’m honestly exhausted by the cherry-picked facts that are framed to support some of the most disconnected views on this conflict. From my view it's using the views of extremists to create conflicting identities for Israelis and Palestinians that have little to do with the reality of everyday people.
Both sides just need to listen to podcasts to resolve this conflict. (sarcasm)I'm optimistic because I believe in the goodness of the people in both Israel and Palestine. I've seen podcasts where everyday individuals from both sides come together to discuss their cultural differences and the devastating breakdowns that fuel the violence. I genuinely believe that ordinary people have the power to find common ground. It's the extremists who shout "death to Israel" and the apologists who make excuses for violence as a result that prop up the barriers to peace.
No, that is an answer that you either don't like or don't understand.Alright then. No answer.Been there, done it, and it doesn’t appear to help.Very keen on hair splitting aren't you.George Orwell would not be proud of your insultingly stupid straw man argument.George Orwell would be proud of your rhetoric.Holding hostages is not a form of attack.
"So what if we kidnapped your family members? So what if we continue to hold the kidnappees.
It's your fault that we are violent. It's your fault that we refuse to end the violence.
We're Muslim and You are Not!
Tom
Kidnapping the hostage is an attack. Holding the hostages is not.
If you could please detail the logic split between hostage taking being an attck byt retaining said hostages is not a continuation of the attack that would be most helpful.
Holding the hostages is a continuation of the crime, but not the attack. Just like the pain from a punch is a continuation from the punch but it is not the punch. It does not mean that the initial act was not an attack. It means its aftermath (depending on the outcome) is not necessarily an attack. That is my view. Either you understand or you don't. Which is different than approving of it or not.
It is serious. People are dying. Their deaths are completely unrelated to whether calling hostage holding an "attack" or not. But their deaths are directly related to whether or not bombs are dropping or bullets are flying.No, that is an answer that you either don't like or don't understand.Alright then. No answer.Been there, done it, and it doesn’t appear to help.Very keen on hair splitting aren't you.George Orwell would not be proud of your insultingly stupid straw man argument.George Orwell would be proud of your rhetoric.Holding hostages is not a form of attack.
"So what if we kidnapped your family members? So what if we continue to hold the kidnappees.
It's your fault that we are violent. It's your fault that we refuse to end the violence.
We're Muslim and You are Not!
Tom
Kidnapping the hostage is an attack. Holding the hostages is not.
If you could please detail the logic split between hostage taking being an attck byt retaining said hostages is not a continuation of the attack that would be most helpful.
Holding the hostages is a continuation of the crime, but not the attack. Just like the pain from a punch is a continuation from the punch but it is not the punch. It does not mean that the initial act was not an attack. It means its aftermath (depending on the outcome) is not necessarily an attack. That is my view. Either you understand or you don't. Which is different than approving of it or not.
I think your view on this is fucked up. I think you are bending over backwards to reinterptet Hamas crimes, so it'll feel better for you. This is serious. People are dying
This is the sort of thing I'm referring to as "terrorist apologetics".It is serious. People are dying. Their deaths are completely unrelated to whether calling hostage holding an "attack" or not. But their deaths are directly related to whether or not bombs are dropping or bullets are flying.
Kidnapping is a crime regardless of when the victims are recovered. Nothing changes that. I
I realize that calling hostage holding an attack makes the supporters of Israel's current actions feel better. If your view is that these discussions are simply therapeutic that helps me understand the persistence in your emotional rhetoric and apparent need to fling bullshit accusations.
Since nothing I wrote on this excuses or explains terrorist activity, your terminology is misleading. Either that is unintentional or it is a conscious attempt to emotional rhetoric to obscure the lack of actual thought and content in your responses.This is the sort of thing I'm referring to as "terrorist apologetics".It is serious. People are dying. Their deaths are completely unrelated to whether calling hostage holding an "attack" or not. But their deaths are directly related to whether or not bombs are dropping or bullets are flying.
Kidnapping is a crime regardless of when the victims are recovered. Nothing changes that. I
I realize that calling hostage holding an attack makes the supporters of Israel's current actions feel better. If your view is that these discussions are simply therapeutic that helps me understand the persistence in your emotional rhetoric and apparent need to fling bullshit accusations.
You might not care much about them or the people who care about them. But every single day of captivity is an attack on Israel.
Tom
You found a bit of pedantry to hand wave the attacks Gazan leadership is perpetrating on Israel Today. TomSince nothing I wrote on this excuses or explains terrorist activity, your terminology is misleading.
Isn't that the problem. Can it really be said that there are two sides when neither party really has a viable goal?Well I’ve been exhausted by this conflict for 20 years! IMO, there is no solution that will satisfy both sides. The fighting there will never permanently end.I’m honestly exhausted by the cherry-picked facts that are framed to support some of the most disconnected views on this conflict. From my view it's using the views of extremists to create conflicting identities for Israelis and Palestinians that have little to do with the reality of everyday people.
It isn't an attack. It is injustice, grossly immoral, a crime, and worse it is blackmail against Israel from seeking justice for the atrocity committed against it.This is the sort of thing I'm referring to as "terrorist apologetics".It is serious. People are dying. Their deaths are completely unrelated to whether calling hostage holding an "attack" or not. But their deaths are directly related to whether or not bombs are dropping or bullets are flying.
Kidnapping is a crime regardless of when the victims are recovered. Nothing changes that. I
I realize that calling hostage holding an attack makes the supporters of Israel's current actions feel better. If your view is that these discussions are simply therapeutic that helps me understand the persistence in your emotional rhetoric and apparent need to fling bullshit accusations.
You might not care much about them or the people who care about them. But every single day of captivity is an attack on Israel.
Tom
Currently, Palestinians are suffering because their Muslim leadership wants them to suffer.Currently, the Palestinians are suffering from lack of aid due to gangs seizing aid trucks. The odd part, Hamas apparently is powerless to stop the much smaller gangs. Palestine feels like the Middle East version of Haiti.
Perhaps if you could provide a link to an actual attack on Israel today from Gaza,, it might lessen the irony of your baseless accusation.You found a bit of pedantry to hand wave the attacks Gazan leadership is perpetrating on Israel Today. TomSince nothing I wrote on this excuses or explains terrorist activity, your terminology is misleading.
I'm referring to the kidnapping victims and their family, friends, and government.Perhaps if you could provide a link to an actual attack on Israel today from Gaza,, it might lessen the irony of your baseless accusation.You found a bit of pedantry to hand wave the attacks Gazan leadership is perpetrating on Israel Today. TomSince nothing I wrote on this excuses or explains terrorist activity, your terminology is misleading.
You keep making this about religion, this is political, not religious. Hamas can end the struggle immediately. They could enact measures that would allow Gaza to be opened back up. Well, until the next group arrives with funding. But peace isn't Hamas' mandate.Currently, Palestinians are suffering because their Muslim leadership wants them to suffer.Currently, the Palestinians are suffering from lack of aid due to gangs seizing aid trucks. The odd part, Hamas apparently is powerless to stop the much smaller gangs. Palestine feels like the Middle East version of Haiti.
Muslims could end this conflict. But they don't want that to happen. So they're going to continue it.
Tom