• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Yet another shooting thread

Don't stack the deck in either direction, let it behave naturally.
I don’t like that. In full implementation it would amount to finsncisl libertarianism, or financial “might makes right”, Economic parity of opportunity would never be approached.
SOME restraint is needed, at least on guys like Fred Trump, Not deck stacking - it’s prevention of deck stacking by guys like that. Racist landlords racist employers seeking to take advantage of, or disadvantage minorities and even white immigrants. There are thousands of guys like Fred, and collectively their words and actions serve to suppress people and perpetuate inequity.
I'm not saying to tolerate abuse. I'm saying to not consider race or gender in most situations.
You can “consider” race/gender all day and all night. Without putting your finger on the inequity scale, “considering” it will do nothing to actually mitigate abuse.
Restraining abusers is NOT “stacking the deck”, but that’s what it is routinely called by white male abusers.
I have no problem with restraining abusers.

By what means that won’t be called “stacking the deck” by those stacking the deck?
 
Maybe the fact is that you are not actually against racial preferences, just racial preferences that do not rate white and male as #1 priority. Because that has been the preference in the US and most of the western world for the last several centuries.
What makes you think he wants white males to be #1?

What I see is someone who is afraid of mass immigration from those of a different culture. Not race.
Uh huh. I’m sure that’s what you tell yourself. Xenophobia and racism are not actually different animals.
Anything to pretend that Islam is not a problem. In small numbers it isn't. But they don't keep out the radicals and there's a big problem with the next generation being easy to radicalize and plenty of money out there to radicalize them with. If Islam quit backing terror I think you would find a lot of us more welcoming of Muslims.
Arab is not the same thing as Muslim.
Muslim is not the same thing as radical.

KKK claims to be a Christian organization. Apparently now so is the GOP.

Please stop equating radicalism with any particular religion. It exists within all religion and also outside of all religions.
 
Loren, I’ve really had enough of your mansplanations. You simply refuse to believe that everything you have achieved was not solely through your own efforts. You have yours and you delude yourself that everyone else had the same opportunities and that racism never gave you a helping hand up. I absolutely believe that you have the aptitude to do well enough in your chosen field. It is not your fault that the history we were all taught ignored so completely the substantial contributions to math and science and computer science and coding that were made by women and people of color, those you state over and over simply lack aptitude or lack a culture that values education. But you are an adult and fully capable of doing reading of histories that document the contributions of nearly everybody other than white men—with an occasional exception to demonstrate that there is no bias in history.

You’re better than that, I think. Or could be if you were not so insecure that you cannot risk being proven mistaken in your very privileged view of the world and your own accomplishments.
We see eternal repetition of bad data, treating disparate outcomes as "proof" of discrimination. When something is supported by a tide of bad data it's probably not correct.

Sure, race is sometimes relevant--but it's sometimes an advantage, also. We eternally see people lumped together on skin color in trying to prove discrimination even when that means combining very unlike groups.

I'm sure you recall the "redlining" "problem" that I brought up here some years ago. Supposedly they were discriminating against black borrowers. Yet race had zero impact on whether someone would be approved. Pretty hard to be discriminating when there's no difference. What they had found was that in certain mostly-black zip codes bankers were less likely to approve low-down mortgages. 80:20 was the same, though.

Thus we are left with explaining why they only discriminate against blacks who are after low-down mortgages in not very good parts of town. Sounds very much like p-hacking. The much simpler explanation is that bankers don't like writing low-down mortgages in areas without price appreciation. And when faced with two theories that fit take the one with the least complexity. The "evidence" consistently fails to consider if there are other reasonable explanations.
Sure, sure, Loren. YOU and YOU ALONE know the truth about redlining and how it did not ever, ever, ever hurt any borrowers of color, ever.

I have never yet known a single racist who believed they were racist.
 
What we do see is that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male.

That’s an interesting perspective, and I’d like to understand it better. Could you provide data or sources to support the claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male? Specifically, it would be helpful to see:

  • Studies or reports analyzing wage disparities across demographics with similar degrees and qualifications.
  • Data comparing employment rates and earnings by race and gender for graduates in comparable fields.
  • Research on employer preferences or hiring practices that might show a bias in favor of non-white, non-male candidates.
If you have examples of where to find this information (e.g., academic studies, labor statistics, industry reports), please share them. This could help clarify and substantiate your point. Thanks!

:rolleyes:
I don't have time for a detailed look and don't have convenient links but it was easy to find this:


It's not specifically about degrees but it shows what's actually going on with the "gender" pay gap.

Thanks for the non-answer. Again, again, and again.
 
Don't stack the deck in either direction, let it behave naturally.
I don’t like that. In full implementation it would amount to finsncisl libertarianism, or financial “might makes right”, Economic parity of opportunity would never be approached.
SOME restraint is needed, at least on guys like Fred Trump, Not deck stacking - it’s prevention of deck stacking by guys like that. Racist landlords racist employers seeking to take advantage of, or disadvantage minorities and even white immigrants. There are thousands of guys like Fred, and collectively their words and actions serve to suppress people and perpetuate inequity.
I'm not saying to tolerate abuse. I'm saying to not consider race or gender in most situations.
You can “consider” race/gender all day and all night. Without putting your finger on the inequity scale, “considering” it will do nothing to actually mitigate abuse.
Restraining abusers is NOT “stacking the deck”, but that’s what it is routinely called by white male abusers.
I have no problem with restraining abusers.

By what means that won’t be called “stacking the deck” by those stacking the deck?
I have no problem with going after people who harm others through racism (say, by refusing to hire group X.) I have a big problem with skewing the selection process to hire the "proper" percent of group X. Disparate outcomes is simply a reason to look, not evidence of guilt.
 
Maybe the fact is that you are not actually against racial preferences, just racial preferences that do not rate white and male as #1 priority. Because that has been the preference in the US and most of the western world for the last several centuries.
What makes you think he wants white males to be #1?

What I see is someone who is afraid of mass immigration from those of a different culture. Not race.
Uh huh. I’m sure that’s what you tell yourself. Xenophobia and racism are not actually different animals.
Anything to pretend that Islam is not a problem. In small numbers it isn't. But they don't keep out the radicals and there's a big problem with the next generation being easy to radicalize and plenty of money out there to radicalize them with. If Islam quit backing terror I think you would find a lot of us more welcoming of Muslims.
Arab is not the same thing as Muslim.
Muslim is not the same thing as radical.

KKK claims to be a Christian organization. Apparently now so is the GOP.

Please stop equating radicalism with any particular religion. It exists within all religion and also outside of all religions.
It is much more of an issue with Islam.

When is the last time you heard of the KKK killing someone? When is the last time you heard of an Islamist killing?
 
What we do see is that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male.

That’s an interesting perspective, and I’d like to understand it better. Could you provide data or sources to support the claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male? Specifically, it would be helpful to see:

  • Studies or reports analyzing wage disparities across demographics with similar degrees and qualifications.
  • Data comparing employment rates and earnings by race and gender for graduates in comparable fields.
  • Research on employer preferences or hiring practices that might show a bias in favor of non-white, non-male candidates.
If you have examples of where to find this information (e.g., academic studies, labor statistics, industry reports), please share them. This could help clarify and substantiate your point. Thanks!

:rolleyes:
I don't have time for a detailed look and don't have convenient links but it was easy to find this:


It's not specifically about degrees but it shows what's actually going on with the "gender" pay gap.

Thanks for the non-answer. Again, again, and again.
Are you dismissing that report as irrelevant?
 
Maybe the fact is that you are not actually against racial preferences, just racial preferences that do not rate white and male as #1 priority. Because that has been the preference in the US and most of the western world for the last several centuries.
What makes you think he wants white males to be #1?

What I see is someone who is afraid of mass immigration from those of a different culture. Not race.
Uh huh. I’m sure that’s what you tell yourself. Xenophobia and racism are not actually different animals.
Anything to pretend that Islam is not a problem. In small numbers it isn't. But they don't keep out the radicals and there's a big problem with the next generation being easy to radicalize and plenty of money out there to radicalize them with. If Islam quit backing terror I think you would find a lot of us more welcoming of Muslims.
Arab is not the same thing as Muslim.
Muslim is not the same thing as radical.

KKK claims to be a Christian organization. Apparently now so is the GOP.

Please stop equating radicalism with any particular religion. It exists within all religion and also outside of all religions.
It is much more of an issue with Islam.

When is the last time you heard of the KKK killing someone? When is the last time you heard of an Islamist killing?
You’ll have to define what you consider an ‘Islamist’ killing. Or ‘Islamist.’ Lots of Hamas killings going on in the Mideast as we type. As for KKK killings: Not that the press has been doing a decent job of reporting but yes, it’s been a while since any killings in the US have been attributed to the KKK. I expect that to change come January.
 
Don't stack the deck in either direction, let it behave naturally.
I don’t like that. In full implementation it would amount to finsncisl libertarianism, or financial “might makes right”, Economic parity of opportunity would never be approached.
SOME restraint is needed, at least on guys like Fred Trump, Not deck stacking - it’s prevention of deck stacking by guys like that. Racist landlords racist employers seeking to take advantage of, or disadvantage minorities and even white immigrants. There are thousands of guys like Fred, and collectively their words and actions serve to suppress people and perpetuate inequity.
I'm not saying to tolerate abuse. I'm saying to not consider race or gender in most situations.
You can “consider” race/gender all day and all night. Without putting your finger on the inequity scale, “considering” it will do nothing to actually mitigate abuse.
Restraining abusers is NOT “stacking the deck”, but that’s what it is routinely called by white male abusers.
I have no problem with restraining abusers.

By what means that won’t be called “stacking the deck” by those stacking the deck?
I have no problem with going after people who harm others through racism (say, by refusing to hire group X.) I have a big problem with skewing the selection process to hire the "proper" percent of group X. Disparate outcomes is simply a reason to look, not evidence of guilt.
Oh. Ex post facto. I see. Wait until Fred Trump has extracted hundreds of millions from hapless poor people, then try to best his tens of millions of dollars worth of lawyers in court, using laws that will be attacked as “deck stacking”?
How you gonna “go after them” without laws that will be seen as stacking the deck, Loren?
“Go arrest the bad guys” sounds like a Trump “solution” to me. Got anything better, or is magic your last resort?
 
What we do see is that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male.

That’s an interesting perspective, and I’d like to understand it better. Could you provide data or sources to support the claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male? Specifically, it would be helpful to see:

  • Studies or reports analyzing wage disparities across demographics with similar degrees and qualifications.
  • Data comparing employment rates and earnings by race and gender for graduates in comparable fields.
  • Research on employer preferences or hiring practices that might show a bias in favor of non-white, non-male candidates.
If you have examples of where to find this information (e.g., academic studies, labor statistics, industry reports), please share them. This could help clarify and substantiate your point. Thanks!

:rolleyes:
I don't have time for a detailed look and don't have convenient links but it was easy to find this:


It's not specifically about degrees but it shows what's actually going on with the "gender" pay gap.

Thanks for the non-answer. Again, again, and again.
Are you dismissing that report as irrelevant?

Does it support your claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male?
 
Arab is not the same thing as Muslim.
Muslim is not the same thing as radical.

KKK claims to be a Christian organization. Apparently now so is the GOP.

Please stop equating radicalism with any particular religion. It exists within all religion and also outside of all religions.
It is much more of an issue with Islam.

When is the last time you heard of the KKK killing someone? When is the last time you heard of an Islamist killing?
You’ll have to define what you consider an ‘Islamist’ killing. Or ‘Islamist.’ Lots of Hamas killings going on in the Mideast as we type. As for KKK killings: Not that the press has been doing a decent job of reporting but yes, it’s been a while since any killings in the US have been attributed to the KKK. I expect that to change come January.
You're proving my point.

And I agree with you that I expect to see racist killings in the US come 2025--I was talking about the current situation, not the future.

And it's not just Hamas, there's Islamist violence across much of Africa and a fair part of Asia.

In 1982 I set out (as part of a group) on the Johannesburg-London overland route--rough, but not a hazard beyond the risks of traffic and disease. That's not been an option for a long time now due to Islamist violence. A while back I was playing with Google Maps trying to see just how messed up it had become--and found I simply could not plot a route that an American could take, not even considering how dangerous it would be. (Google isn't going to have a lot to say about this as such things were no longer an option in the era of the internet.)
 
Maybe the fact is that you are not actually against racial preferences, just racial preferences that do not rate white and male as #1 priority. Because that has been the preference in the US and most of the western world for the last several centuries.
What makes you think he wants white males to be #1?

What I see is someone who is afraid of mass immigration from those of a different culture. Not race.
Uh huh. I’m sure that’s what you tell yourself. Xenophobia and racism are not actually different animals.
Anything to pretend that Islam is not a problem. In small numbers it isn't. But they don't keep out the radicals and there's a big problem with the next generation being easy to radicalize and plenty of money out there to radicalize them with. If Islam quit backing terror I think you would find a lot of us more welcoming of Muslims.
Arab is not the same thing as Muslim.
Muslim is not the same thing as radical.

KKK claims to be a Christian organization. Apparently now so is the GOP.

Please stop equating radicalism with any particular religion. It exists within all religion and also outside of all religions.
Oh for fuck sake Loren. “They don’t keep out radicals”? They are easily radicalized and the big money is in on it? That is the modern GOP.

My brother in-law is Pakistani Muslim. He and his siblings are more secular and liberal than any of the Trumpers I know and that definitely includes all of the Trump supporting infidels here. They are all atheist and practice only some culture to keep their parents assuaged.

They are exactly the kind of multicultural “woke” nice to everybody people that American conservatives revile. They are in a tough spot with hardline religious assholes hating them for multiple real and fictitious reasons.

Of course I get to the point of lumping all Christians into the Christofascist camp because of the GOP embrace of Project 2025 type shit. But then I got a dose of reality on that when we moved out AA group to a rented space at a United Church of Christ. The pastor is openly lesbian and married and they are the warmest most welcoming people I’ve encountered in a long time. I’m still an atheist but I’ll volunteer to help out around that church any day.
 
Of course the problem in places like Pakistan is that the people that can, leave. Much like the small town brain drain in the American south.
 
I have no problem with going after people who harm others through racism (say, by refusing to hire group X.) I have a big problem with skewing the selection process to hire the "proper" percent of group X. Disparate outcomes is simply a reason to look, not evidence of guilt.
Oh. Ex post facto. I see. Wait until Fred Trump has extracted hundreds of millions from hapless poor people, then try to best his tens of millions of dollars worth of lawyers in court, using laws that will be attacked as “deck stacking”?
How you gonna “go after them” without laws that will be seen as stacking the deck, Loren?
“Go arrest the bad guys” sounds like a Trump “solution” to me. Got anything better, or is magic your last resort?
So pre-crime for an offense you don't like.
 
So pre-crime for an offense you don't like.

Right. Murder* is illegal even if you didn’t murder anyone yet. Of course it infringes a little bit on the rights of murderers … stacking the deck against them.
Hell, if they keep doing that, we could run out if murderers!

Get off the silly string, Loren. Last time I checked, you can’t pass laws against what someone does ex post facto.

* the same is true for lesser offenses.
 
Last edited:
What we do see is that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male.

That’s an interesting perspective, and I’d like to understand it better. Could you provide data or sources to support the claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male? Specifically, it would be helpful to see:

  • Studies or reports analyzing wage disparities across demographics with similar degrees and qualifications.
  • Data comparing employment rates and earnings by race and gender for graduates in comparable fields.
  • Research on employer preferences or hiring practices that might show a bias in favor of non-white, non-male candidates.
If you have examples of where to find this information (e.g., academic studies, labor statistics, industry reports), please share them. This could help clarify and substantiate your point. Thanks!

:rolleyes:
I don't have time for a detailed look and don't have convenient links but it was easy to find this:


It's not specifically about degrees but it shows what's actually going on with the "gender" pay gap.

Thanks for the non-answer. Again, again, and again.
Are you dismissing that report as irrelevant?

Does it support your claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male?
No AA system there, so you wouldn't expect it. What it shows is that the gender pay gap is due to motherhood.
 
What we do see is that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male.

That’s an interesting perspective, and I’d like to understand it better. Could you provide data or sources to support the claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male? Specifically, it would be helpful to see:

  • Studies or reports analyzing wage disparities across demographics with similar degrees and qualifications.
  • Data comparing employment rates and earnings by race and gender for graduates in comparable fields.
  • Research on employer preferences or hiring practices that might show a bias in favor of non-white, non-male candidates.
If you have examples of where to find this information (e.g., academic studies, labor statistics, industry reports), please share them. This could help clarify and substantiate your point. Thanks!

:rolleyes:
I don't have time for a detailed look and don't have convenient links but it was easy to find this:


It's not specifically about degrees but it shows what's actually going on with the "gender" pay gap.

Thanks for the non-answer. Again, again, and again.
Are you dismissing that report as irrelevant?

Does it support your claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male?
No AA system there, so you wouldn't expect it. What it shows is that the gender pay gap is due to motherhood.
Are you okay, Loren?
 
What we do see is that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male.

That’s an interesting perspective, and I’d like to understand it better. Could you provide data or sources to support the claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male? Specifically, it would be helpful to see:

  • Studies or reports analyzing wage disparities across demographics with similar degrees and qualifications.
  • Data comparing employment rates and earnings by race and gender for graduates in comparable fields.
  • Research on employer preferences or hiring practices that might show a bias in favor of non-white, non-male candidates.
If you have examples of where to find this information (e.g., academic studies, labor statistics, industry reports), please share them. This could help clarify and substantiate your point. Thanks!

:rolleyes:
I don't have time for a detailed look and don't have convenient links but it was easy to find this:


It's not specifically about degrees but it shows what's actually going on with the "gender" pay gap.

Thanks for the non-answer. Again, again, and again.
Are you dismissing that report as irrelevant?

Does it support your claim that degrees are more valuable if you're not a white male?
No AA system there, so you wouldn't expect it. What it shows is that the gender pay gap is due to motherhood.

I don't give a shit about that because that's not what I was asking about.
 
Of course the problem in places like Pakistan is that the people that can, leave. Much like the small town brain drain in the American south.
It's not just the south. And it's an unfair characterization. Many/most rural communities lose population to The Big City because there are more jobs there and more opportunities. It's a real issue for parents and for young adults. Parents usually want what is best for their kids and struggle with the fact that often means that they move far away. Young adults are drawn to the greater opportunities of urban areas--and then struggle with the high cost of living. Sometimes the older generation moves to a more urban area to be near adult kids/grandkids, healthcare, etc. and sometimes younger adults move back to smaller communities for the reduced stress and relaxing atmosphere.
 
Back
Top Bottom