excreationist
Married mouth-breather
I'm making a game based on Deuteronomy 20:16-20
https://iidb.org/threads/controversial-upcoming-game-brutal-bible-bloodbaths.28143
This is the start of verse 20 in the CEV:
So what I want to do is have city walls blocking access and shut city gates. Then you build a ladder and get over the walls and unlock the gates.
Copilot said this:
I thought it would be better for the city gates to open outwards. That way you could have it push against something if outsiders tried to force the gates inwards.
Is copilot confused?
https://iidb.org/threads/controversial-upcoming-game-brutal-bible-bloodbaths.28143
This is the start of verse 20 in the CEV:
You may need wood to make ladders and towers to help you get over the walls and capture the town
So what I want to do is have city walls blocking access and shut city gates. Then you build a ladder and get over the walls and unlock the gates.
Copilot said this:
Historically, city gates typically opened inward towards the city. This inward-opening design had several advantages:
Defense: Inward-opening gates were harder for attackers to break down since they would push against the city's walls and additional fortifications.
Control: City defenders could more easily close the gates quickly in times of emergency or attack.
Space: This design minimized the amount of space needed outside the gates, allowing more room for city defenses and making it harder for attackers to gather in large numbers right outside the walls.
Inward-opening gates were a strategic choice to enhance the city's security and control.
I thought it would be better for the city gates to open outwards. That way you could have it push against something if outsiders tried to force the gates inwards.
Is copilot confused?