• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The Case for Christianity

Why Christianity?​

If reality is a spiritual experience—as I argued earlier—then the deepest truths of life are not grasped by logic alone, but lived through the conscious, interpretive self. We don’t work with facts, we interpret them. Science itself is such an interpretation. We need the world to be rational and have meaning. Love, purpose, justice, equity vs equality are not just personal desires but universal truths that we use to judge one another as well as ourselves.

So: Why Christianity?
Firstly, moral behaviour is a fundamental human expectation we have of one another. It's a deeper concern than I will be able to get into here and much of it you will have been exposed to. What I want to point to though is that morality is not, to the human spirit, a social code. It's a reflection of our personal character. We are moral because we seek to be noble.

The moral code is sufficiently addressed in many philosophies and religions (although during the time of Jesus, the link between religion and morality is more tenuous). The central issue that Jesus embodied is that this moral code has its source in God. And the moral code is, simply, to love God and love one another. Not only that, love is the meaning and fulfilment of our life.

He expects us to know what to do based solely on this predicate. And the evidence that God exists is him. He was prophesied and he fulfilled those prophecies.

It's as simple as that. Is love the fundamental motivation in our lives? Is it right for us to love our neighbour, even our enemies? Can we love those we do not trust? That's his challenge. Love one another and all will fall into place. It seems obvious but it's so much more than that. You need help to do this, you need help to live your life as you should. Your best help is God.
That can be fit into Buddhism, Zen, and modern psychology to one degree or another.
 
In fact I don't think it shows excessive fondness for life to want a probability of success somewhere north of 99.99%.

What you want, and what reality is, are two different things. Also there are plenty of instances in other peoples' lives where 95% certainty of success or lower does apply. See for example those in disease-stricken countries or wartorn countries. I'm also not saying 99.9% certainty isn't possible, just that even that is not always achievable given what information is available. I'm definitely not 99.9% certain I will live again tomorrow, because I lack information about what will happen in the future with regards to random events. I'm not sure what a lack of fondness for life has to do with that.
 
Last edited:

I've never understood this. You have no knowledge of any kind? You're not really sure you're a scientist? You're not sure that you're not 100% sure of anything? You're not even sure that you think you're a scientist? You're not sure that you probably think you're probably a scientist?

Personally have never understood the confusion over not knowing anything 100%. Why must we be 100% certain of anything? We can still be 95%, 90%, or 85% certain, etc. That doesn't mean "we don't know anything" if we're 95% certain of something. That's not good enough?

You can have a confidence level of 95%, but not a certainty of 95%. If you were 96% certain then you would be uncertain.

If your usage were correct, then Christians could legitimately claim certainty that gods exist: "Hey, I said I am certain, and I am. I am less than 1% certain."
 
I'm not even sure what is meant by the term spiritual. Does that refer to the emotions one feels when they view a beautiful scene in nature, or when their dog comes up to hug them and give them doggie kisses, or when your partner tells you they love you or the way a woman feels after having multiple orgasms with a loving partner, or when you read a good book, a lovely poem, grow a flower garden and watch the flowers bloom, or simply the warm and fuzzy feelings you get when you do something nice for someone etc. What exactly does that term mean?

People have told me they are spiritual but not religious. Again, are they referring to emotions or that they have some vague belief in a supernatural world? Why can't we just be good without gods or spirituality? And, since a lot of us are skeptical about humans having free will or absolute free will, can anyone really help what they believe or how they act? I personally believe that we are all products of our genetic and environmental influences. We can't change genetics, but sometimes environmental influences can have either a negative or positive impact on a person's character.

Regardless, since we have the Ten Commitments of Humanism, why in the world do we need Christianity to keep us moral and caring? Secular Humanism is often viewed as a secular form of religion and the motto of the American Humanist Association is "Good without a God". The commitments aren't commandments. They are just principles for living a better, more satisfying life. I embrace humanism, although not all atheists do. But, my point is that we don't need to be spiritual, whatever the means, to try and live a good life. In fact, religion often is a cause of division, wars and hatred, but we've already given examples of that, so I'll just add the 10 commitments as an example of how we can strive to be better humans, no gods required.

The Ten Commitments

Critical Thinking

As we are each bombarded with a constant stream of information, it can become challenging to decide what is accurate and true. Thinking critically allows us to make sense of all this information and reason our way to good judgments and effective solutions to the problems we face while rigorously avoiding pitfalls like rationalization, conformity, and stereotyping. This process forms the basis of the scientific method, which opens the door for new discoveries through hypothesizing and experimenting. Critical thinking is a skill that requires continued attention, practice, and reflection. Exercising our minds to build these skills enables us to challenge biases in ourselves and in others, paving the way for a fair, open-minded, and autonomous perspective that fosters a multicultural worldview.


Ethical Development

The key to understanding ethical development is acknowledging that nobody is perfect or has all the answers. Ethical development is a never-ending process that requires constant reflection and evaluation of our personal choices and the consequences they have on others. Fairness, cooperation, and sharing are among the first moral issues we encounter in our ethical development as human beings and are often embraced intuitively, but each new day carries with it new challenges and new moral dilemmas. We should continually adapt and rebuild our moral frameworks with the goal of becoming ever better human beings.


Peace and Social Justice

True peace involves an intense commitment to social justice and affirms the human rights and personal autonomy of all people. Any level of injustice against groups or individuals signifies existing conflict, even if the conflict isn’t immediate or obvious. We attain peace only by consistently responding to injustice through thoughtful conflict resolution that aims to repair harms and ensure a fair and equitable society moving forward. This kind of conflict resolution is known as restorative justice. In order to achieve a just, peaceful society, we all must take claims of injustice seriously and ensure that those who are impacted most by rights-violations determine the best course forward.


Service and Participation

Service and participation means putting values into action in ways that positively impact our communities and society as a whole. It fosters helping others, increasing social awareness, enhancing accountability, and many attributes of the other nine commitments. Engaging in service doesn’t just make the recipients better off, but those who serve can develop new skills, experiences, and personal satisfaction that all promote personal growth. We must all recognize that we are members of a group, and engaging in service to benefit the group and the other individuals in it makes us all better off.


Empathy

Empathy means entering imaginatively into another’s situation in an attempt to understand their experience as though we are experiencing it ourselves. Empathy requires a person to step outside of their own perspective to consider someone else’s thoughts, feelings, or circumstance from that person’s point of view. In many ways, empathy is the first step to ethical behavior as it allows us to respond compassionately to the suffering of others and exercise good judgement when our actions may affect someone else. Understanding another’s perspective is not only critical to building better relationships, but also makes us better citizens in our local and global communities. Empathy promotes tolerance, consideration, and compassion amongst us all.


Humility

Humility means displaying modesty about accomplishments, talents, gifts, or importance of self. It acknowledges we humans are fallible and have limitations in what we know and can do. Being humble isn’t about having low self-esteem or denigrating oneself. Humility at its core is robust self-awareness—awareness of our strengths and weaknesses, our faults and our merits. Humility involves setting aside personal pride and overcoming our egos to embrace gratitude for what you have and appreciate others for who they are. In being humble, one recognizes their own value in relation to others; inherently, you are neither better nor worse than anyone else.

Environmentalism

Regardless of our individual identities, we all share the same home: planet Earth. Just as we depend on the planet to sustain us with its precious resources, this planet’s ecosystems depend on us to be good stewards and take responsibility for the impact human activity has on our shared planet. Disregard for the large-scale impacts humans have on our environment has caused extensive harm to earth’s ecosystems. Despite this, humanity is also capable of positive environmental change that values the interdependence of all life on this planet. Each of us must acknowledge our collective and individual mistakes, repair past damages, and purposefully work toward cultivating rich, diverse, and resilient ecosystems.


Global Awareness

We live in a world that is rich in cultural, social, and individual diversity—a world with rapidly increasing interdependence. As a result, events anywhere are more likely to have consequences everywhere. Global awareness broadens our knowledge of cultures and perspectives that are outside of our own experience. A true global awareness includes attention to both current and historical events, and acknowledges how we affect—and how we are affected by—the interconnected social, political, and economic systems in which we reside. The end-goal of global awareness is global citizenship, which recognizes our personal responsibility to foster a healthy and dignified life for everyone in our global community.


Responsibility

Every day, each of us makes choices. These choices, large and small, all have consequences—for ourselves and for the world around us. Moral responsibility involves taking conscious ownership of one’s intentions and actions, and being accountable for the resulting consequences. Although we all live in a society with various cultural values, expectations, codes of conduct, and social mores, ultimately we all decide for ourselves what is right and wrong. Being a responsible person involves steadfast attention to what is right and willfully bearing the blame or praise for our own actions.


10Cmtmts_6-150x150.png
Altruism

Altruism is the selfless concern for the welfare of other living beings without expectation of reward, recognition, or return. The collective welfare of our communities and society depends on the welfare of each individual person. We should always seek to alleviate the suffering and hardships of others with compassionate action. By caring for others around us and lifting each other up, we reinforce healthy connections and contribute to the betterment of our community, society, and the world.


Download a PDF version of The Ten Commitments
Published in the September / October 2019 Humanist

Tags: Ten Commitments
 

I've never understood this. You have no knowledge of any kind? You're not really sure you're a scientist? You're not sure that you're not 100% sure of anything? You're not even sure that you think you're a scientist? You're not sure that you probably think you're probably a scientist?

Personally have never understood the confusion over not knowing anything 100%. Why must we be 100% certain of anything? We can still be 95%, 90%, or 85% certain, etc. That doesn't mean "we don't know anything" if we're 95% certain of something. That's not good enough?

You can have a confidence level of 95%, but not a certainty of 95%. If you were 96% certain then you would be uncertain.

I would be uncertain, but still not sure why that's a problem as there are many uncertainties in life to begin with. Also, low uncertainty is still much better than high uncertainty.
 
Last edited:

Why Christianity?​

If reality is a spiritual experience—as I argued earlier—then the deepest truths of life are not grasped by logic alone, but lived through the conscious, interpretive self. We don’t work with facts, we interpret them. Science itself is such an interpretation. We need the world to be rational and have meaning. Love, purpose, justice, equity vs equality are not just personal desires but universal truths that we use to judge one another as well as ourselves.

So: Why Christianity?
Firstly, moral behaviour is a fundamental human expectation we have of one another. It's a deeper concern than I will be able to get into here and much of it you will have been exposed to. What I want to point to though is that morality is not, to the human spirit, a social code. It's a reflection of our personal character. We are moral because we seek to be noble.

The moral code is sufficiently addressed in many philosophies and religions (although during the time of Jesus, the link between religion and morality is more tenuous). The central issue that Jesus embodied is that this moral code has its source in God. And the moral code is, simply, to love God and love one another. Not only that, love is the meaning and fulfilment of our life.

He expects us to know what to do based solely on this predicate. And the evidence that God exists is him. He was prophesied and he fulfilled those prophecies.

It's as simple as that. Is love the fundamental motivation in our lives? Is it right for us to love our neighbour, even our enemies? Can we love those we do not trust? That's his challenge. Love one another and all will fall into place. It seems obvious but it's so much more than that. You need help to do this, you need help to live your life as you should. Your best help is God.

You really don’t say much of anything here, and give us no reason why we can’t practice and experience love and a moral life without god. In fact, we can — nonbelievers do this all the time,. How do account for that?
This is why I don't care for acting particularly friendly towards these people. They're going to assert I don't feel love no matter what I say, no matter how friendly I am towards them.
 
@Brunswick1954 this goes back to the fairies at the bottom of the lake I brought up earlier. You say we need to be moral, good, forgiving — but we can’t, or won’t, do that without god, or at least his help, or something.

But why? Do we say, “that lake is beautiful, but only because of the fairies at the bottom of it”? Nobody says that. The absurdity is manifest. The fairies are superfluous, as is the Christian god.

I am not against religion. It is a part of human culture. But scientific culture produces weapons of mass destruction. The written culture produces Mein Kampf and hate tracts. The visual culture produces Nazi swastikas and snuff films. And the religious culture produces abortion-clinic bombers and suicide bombers.

It seems to me when we look to a mental projection of god to justify good works and love, we are seeking a sanction — a reward. But love is its own reward.

Sometimes I wonder whether we need most culture at all. The aforementioned Krishnamurti questioned the need for it, except to pass down technical knowledge. Why, he asked, do we run off to a museum to see a painting, when we can sit in nature and observe its beauty directly? Why do we read and write? Krishnamurti wrote nothing — all his books are transcriptions of talks. LIke Jesus and Buddha, his culture was entirely oral with little or nothing else. He said he did not read books, though friends said he occasionally read detective novels for entertainment.

Buddha said be a lamp unto yourself. Krishnamurti said be a light unto yourself. Christ said the kingdom of heaven is in you.
 
It perplexes me when the Christian line is that we can't be compassionate and moral without Jesus. Bob Jones Sr. (of BJU, the thinking man's uni) once referred to man's sinful nature as "green slime from hell." If man's basic nature is base, selfish, and sinful (in which case the fault lies with the manufacturer), then we wouldn't be drawn to any movement that asserts that it was created to pull us away from our basic nature and completely reorient us. The truth is, religionists who live good lives. treat others with respect, do good works, are simply positive, creatively good people by nature (and nurture.) The more they ignore the crazy, primitive stuff in their scripture, the more good they do in the world.
 
You really don’t say much of anything here, and give us no reason why we can’t practice and experience love and a moral life without god. In fact, we can — nonbelievers do this all the time,. How do account for that?
This is why I don't care for acting particularly friendly towards these people. They're going to assert I don't feel love no matter what I say, no matter how friendly I am towards them.
Well, some will.

Others will just assert that, as you do feel love, you really are a Christian, and just don't know it, or won't admit it.

I am not sure which attitude I despise more.
 
Some of them -- the ultra-obsessed -- believe that you deserve to suffer for eternity, with no respite, because you don't share their supernatural beliefs. That's the love community for ya.

They invented the worst of all possible worlds, a world in which people suffer eternal torment, and they call this the "good news."
 
@Brunswick1954 this goes back to the fairies at the bottom of the lake I brought up earlier. You say we need to be moral, good, forgiving — but we can’t, or won’t, do that without god, or at least his help, or something.

But why? Do we say, “that lake is beautiful, but only because of the fairies at the bottom of it”? Nobody says that. The absurdity is manifest. The fairies are superfluous, as is the Christian god.

I am not against religion. It is a part of human culture. But scientific culture produces weapons of mass destruction. The written culture produces Mein Kampf and hate tracts. The visual culture produces Nazi swastikas and snuff films. And the religious culture produces abortion-clinic bombers and suicide bombers.

It seems to me when we look to a mental projection of god to justify good works and love, we are seeking a sanction — a reward. But love is its own reward.

Sometimes I wonder whether we need most culture at all. The aforementioned Krishnamurti questioned the need for it, except to pass down technical knowledge. Why, he asked, do we run off to a museum to see a painting, when we can sit in nature and observe its beauty directly? Why do we read and write? Krishnamurti wrote nothing — all his books are transcriptions of talks. LIke Jesus and Buddha, his culture was entirely oral with little or nothing else. He said he did not read books, though friends said he occasionally read detective novels for entertainment.

Buddha said be a lamp unto yourself. Krishnamurti said be a light unto yourself. Christ said the kingdom of heaven is in you.
The thing is to apply rationality to these arguments. If you can't see any rationality in any of them, then discard them all. Go with whichever makes the most sense to you. I'm not sure why you find the lake beautiful. I find it beautiful because it makes me feel peaceful when I look at it. Looking around, I find the sky and the hills beautiful as well. I find nature peaceful whilst I find looking at traffic annoying. I look at the discoveries of science and I find them beautiful as well. But I find the arguments amongst scientists annoying. For a very long time, I was an atheist. There's nothing wrong with it. Continue being one. There's no reason to believe anything if it doesn't make sense to you.
 
It perplexes me when the Christian line is that we can't be compassionate and moral without Jesus. Bob Jones Sr. (of BJU, the thinking man's uni) once referred to man's sinful nature as "green slime from hell." If man's basic nature is base, selfish, and sinful (in which case the fault lies with the manufacturer), then we wouldn't be drawn to any movement that asserts that it was created to pull us away from our basic nature and completely reorient us. The truth is, religionists who live good lives. treat others with respect, do good works, are simply positive, creatively good people by nature (and nurture.) The more they ignore the crazy, primitive stuff in their scripture, the more good they do in the world.
Actually, I don't agree with this. There're plenty of good people in this world, some are Hindus, Buddhists, Muslim, agnostics, etc. Believing in any religion does not necessarily make you a good person. My case for Christianity is not about the world being a horrible place unless we all bow down and worship God.
 
No tacti
Yes, it's a common tactic among Christian apologists* that if you can get your intended target to perhaps admit that maybe there might be some kind of mysterious creative force behind natural phenomena, if for no other reason than because they can't point to an actual physical reason for the phenomena, then the next logical step is to insist that the person must ask Jesus Christ into their heart and become saved.

And if they don't, they are being hypocritical because they already admitted that God exists, so clearly they don't want to be a Christian because they are selfish and sinful and bad.

That's why you can say you are presenting an argument for Christianity per se, but only mention things like God and Faith and Souls, and whatnot. No actual specifics about Christ or Christianity are necessary, because that will come along in lock-step once we've all agreed that some god must exist somehow.

* I know it's a common tactic because I used to employ it when I was a Christian apologist.
No tactic on my end. Believe what you will. You're not going to Hell, lol. I was just hoping to make a logical case for Christianity, LOL.
 
You really don’t say much of anything here, and give us no reason why we can’t practice and experience love and a moral life without god. In fact, we can — nonbelievers do this all the time,. How do account for that?
This is why I don't care for acting particularly friendly towards these people. They're going to assert I don't feel love no matter what I say, no matter how friendly I am towards them.
Well, some will.

Others will just assert that, as you do feel love, you really are a Christian, and just don't know it, or won't admit it.

I am not sure which attitude I despise more.
Actually, my response is a little more subtle than that. It's difficult to explain because God is impossible to define, so it's entirely possible you believe what I believe as well but we're expressing it in a different way. Secondly, language is notoriously misleading. What I say if often not what you understand by what I said, and often not really what I intended to say.

Anyway, believe what you will, like or dislike what you will. I enjoy reading your posts regardless. But I do have difficulty responding in a way that is helpful. That's why I try to stick to "making my case" rather than answering your individual comments.
 

Confession​

Alright. Time to 'fess up. I'm an anthropologist and female. That might explain the tone of my posts, lol. I'm "scientific" enough to have developed some computer programs, including my own little AI app which helps me manage my computer related work. With so much material to keep on top of, AI can be a lot of help. And I can tweak it to suit my needs. I've also lectured at some of the top universities in the world, inc. Harvard, Cambridge and NUS (that's the National University of Singapore). But that's beside the point, no? Do my intellectual creds matter? Surely you can judge an argument by its merits. And I make it a point to reduce things to its simplest form. Part of my scientific or academic training. Those two terms are to me, one and the same, meaning rigorous and critical thinking. The rest is just your field of study.

I do anthropology because I love studying into what makes us tick. And foreign societies and communities allow me to look at people and their behaviour perhaps more unbiasedly.

Which brings me to this thread. Why am I doing it? Like I said, I became a Christian in my 50s. And it was quite a revelation which I wanted to share with people who are able to give me critical feedback. It's not going as well as I had hoped, lol.

Anyway, I can't help but bring my anthropological mind into what I do. So, here are some of my findings, surprising in some instances but interesting, every one of them.

1.People like magic
Interestingly, both believers and non-believers are more interested in the magical aspects of Christianity than in its moral and personal framework. Why does it matter? Do you need God to appear before you and convince you personally?

2. The "Arrogance" of the Righteous
Many people who are doing well in their lives think it's them. They don't really appreciate how much is happenstance. Sadly, many people who are not doing well also blame themselves. It's not all their fault. We can make a difference to our own lives but our ability to do so is much less than we think.

3. Life without God
This is a very modern, Westernised outlook. Every culture that I know of have a sense of the metaphysical or the supernatural (BTW, these two words have different connotations), except the modern Western society. To the detriment of the young, I believe. Young people from Westernised developed countries are the most lost and adrift young people I've met. Almost any religion is better than no religion.

4. Love as Moral Foundation
Many Westerners think it's obvious. But it's not. Until Jesus made it central. Even then, we still don't fully realise the extent of his assertion. Love, for Jesus, is complete and sacrificial. It's where the forgiveness of sins come from. It's about lost sheep. Loving and forgiving your enemies. It's not just about being a good person.

Plus, Jesus wasn't just saying, be a good person. He was saying look after the disenfranchised. Our stance against slavery, racism, etc. came from that. Note that other non-Christian countries still maintain their caste systems and other inhuman religious and cultural practices. In the name of religion, unsurprisingly.

Philip Yancey wrote a good book about it, What's So Amazing About Grace?, and pointed out that this, forgiving past quarrels, is the only solution to war between countries (putting aside for the moment, the economic motivation of war).

5.God vs Religion
We don’t seem to notice this but the Judaic/Christian/Muslim God does not belong to any religion and indeed, hates religion with a passion. Jesus spoke most and most harshly against the lawgivers and religious leaders of his own "religion".

6. What does it matter?
In case you haven't noticed, we're in crisis, not just in terms of environmental crisis, but also in many aspects of our lives, and yet we're also closest to global peace than we've ever been. We need a way forward. We need an alternative to materialism.

7. Is Christianity the solution?
Not in its current form and maybe not even as a religion but as a universal basis for humanity and human rights. But as a personal religion, it also works for me. It's a lot less superstitious and more scientific than you think it is. There's no need to convert anyone to Christianity. We just need to accept its ideals. Which are self-evident enough for most people. We don't even have to succeed doing so. Love one another, that's good enough.

The rest is in the far more able hands of God, lol.
*Sorry, I couldn't resist this last sentence.
 
Life Without God

Is being lost and adrift when you are young all that dire and terrible? IMO, a strong argument could be made that one should be somewhat lost and adrift when one is young. Perhaps it should be somewhat difficult to discover who one is and what one believes at that stage of life. Perhaps one's political ideology should also be turbulent at that age. There are many options for a young person to consider and many reasons why each of them make their own choices. Maybe we should retain some doubts about our choices at all ages.

Is Christianity the solution

Whose version of Christianity? I certainly do not see White Christian nationalism as any reasonable basis for human rights. OTOH, there are versions of Christianity much more palatable.

What does it matter?

Many people don't seem to realize the truth of the old saying 'there but for the grace of God go I', it leading to the conclusion that to help other people is to help yourself. That in doing so you provide insurance for yourself and your ow family members should you stumble and fall at some point in life.
 
Back
Top Bottom