Search results for query: *

I agree with pood. I see.... or do I? Science requires experimentation. Experimentation requires philosophical minded individuals It's of no coincidence that scientists have aptly named titles to them, I.e. having PhDs, or 'Doctor of Philosophy' titles, to state what should be a little obvious. 😏

With a slight rearrangement of words in order. you could also add to the above, to make a little more clearer what we mean when using the word 'think' in context relating to philosophy - thus we have below: Philosophy IS (also) the ability to think.

Sorry a rushed post, Indeed I would say 'problem solving' is an aspect of philosophy, and also 'what if' thoughts, like for example having imaginative ideas like: 'what if' we colonised and lived on Mars (whether or not this would be likely doesn't matter).

If someone has given thought to it I suppose. Ah you just did. 🙂

It's not so hard to understand the 'interpretation'. For example, the line: "Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s". That line is widely interpreted as highlighting the distinction between two realms of governance: the temporal authority...

Be afraid. Be very afraid of Leoiner da Cwiston... 🤭 um sorry 'bout dat. I see, well funny enough... ...I can understand the idea that something resembling 'Christianity being forced through political means' describes the types that choose to go through the wide gate. Christianity according...

Yes indeed DBT. Further to this, Jesus also answered a question shown in the verses below: It won't mean anything to you (or threatened Steve) but cheers for reminding me... verses like these in contrast to each other, I find perspectively quite profound.

I hope this isn't too much of an inconvenience, but could you be so kind to add a date around September 2026, because I promised to hold the next family BBQ around July or August at the latest. 🤙 Yes your faith is strong but please don't forget my BBQ next year request? Mucho grassy arse...

Yes indeed... to be nurtured.

It's only a nutty world for humans when it involves humans. "Nutty humans" the animals of the wild must often be saying to themselves. Biblically speaking... ..that is the result and consequence as its been told for millennia: humans can't run the world by themselves! 'Thall shalt not be...

(Keeping with the sense of humour of the thread) I think you must mean the nuthouse is a causation of evolution, coz God does not exist (in your paradigm). Nuttiness therefore exists because it is either, a "survival" characteristic,or.... ... its the total opposite. Which therefore means...

Depends how you see it.... ...I mean being anti-Christ i.e. being anti-Jesus by various attempted approaches, distortions and corruption of scriptures, denying people existed, to mislead, etc. & etc.just to name a few .. that's how his enemies work. Even under the guise of Christians...

Not really, no. The context of the 'wide gate' for example is in contrast to do with the condemnation of liars and hypocrites, especially 'religious' ones claiming to do the things that they do...is in Gods name. Yeah so, you could consider the idea as to 'why' for example,"salvation by works"...

I'm not at all cranky about gays, you not going get an argument there on me, nice try, although to the other part however,.. ....I could still go to the lake of fire if I were willingly doing opposite to what Christ teaches. "Many will walk through the wide gate to destruction.etc.& etc ...

Ideology is right on it. They are supposed to be virgins.. ...but no worries, they're not heterosexuals either. The mere sexual attraction or the sexual thoughts on another person, I would say, is NOT an element or criteria that defines them in terms of being holy.🕊️

By your reasoning in consideration. Would the Vatican be the only source of early criticism on Christianity? And... how was this early criticism revealed to you? You'd guess. An interesting thought, but..but will it happen though? the same as the previous above. I suppose to some degree, I...

I must be special then to get a response like that. Do you mean to say some religious people don't do any of the above in your statement? Hmmm ok. I suspect 3000 years from now they will find 'along side' the stories of captain Kirk and Luke Skywalker, many written pages of critics who write...

Pardon me, I wasn't clear here. It wouldn't beJesus they'd be advising, or guiding, rather. The 144,000 would be assisting Jesus to guide everyone else.

I like the much nicer view of the relating scriptures: If we were to see them as 'co-managing'. That is 144,000 managing advisers (if you will) who would also be ruling with Christ the rest of us... ..."a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples...

Atheist: If you canny beat 'em. ...den mock em. Aye mon (or, Amen if preferred)