• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The secret Christians aren’t sharing with you

godincarnate.me

New member
Joined
Nov 30, 2025
Messages
49
Location
Hoosic River Valley
Basic Beliefs
I am God incarnate. When I die, all existence ends and begins again.
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation.
I was unaware that 'gods incarnate: do estimations,. I.e. approximations, which are not quite 'exact' values.

In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I

I suspect the 'reasons known' where the Messiah claim is applied to Jesus - is when Christians are simply taking the view that there can 'only be one Messiah and .Jesus is it.

surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

There's more material to scrutinize than a lot of the lesser gods. For example (and not meant as an Insult in anyway):

Who else apart from yourself has written about you, writing their testimonies of the god incarnate?
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation.
I was unaware that 'gods incarnate: do estimations,. I.e. approximations, which are not quite 'exact' values.

In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I

I suspect the 'reasons known' where the Messiah claim is applied to Jesus - is when Christians are simply taking the view that there can 'only be one Messiah and .Jesus is it.

surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

There's more material to scrutinize than a lot of the lesser gods. For example (and not meant as an Insult in anyway):

Who else apart from yourself has written about you, writing their testimonies of the god incarnate?
No one and that's how I like it. haha
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation.
I was unaware that 'gods incarnate: do estimations,. I.e. approximations, which are not quite 'exact' values.

In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I

I suspect the 'reasons known' where the Messiah claim is applied to Jesus - is when Christians are simply taking the view that there can 'only be one Messiah and .Jesus is it.

surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

There's more material to scrutinize than a lot of the lesser gods. For example (and not meant as an Insult in anyway):

Who else apart from yourself has written about you, writing their testimonies of the god incarnate?
No one and that's how I like it. haha

But incarnate, You are only putting yourself in the same group like the Christians - I've quoted you below

... I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational...

Welcome to the forum btw.
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
That’s what makes it a secret. People like you not believing it.
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child? I think not. Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.
 
That’s what makes it a secret. People like you not believing it.

That’s not an explanation, that’s an escape hatch.

If your claim depends on “they all secretly believe it, but you’ll never see any evidence because it’s a secret,” you’ve just admitted it’s unfalsifiable. You might as well say Christians secretly worship Thor too and call my disbelief “proof” it’s hidden.

If you want to be taken seriously, argue from what Christians actually say and do, not from head-canon about a belief you can’t show and then protect by calling it “secret.”

NHC
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child? I think not. Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Parents telling kids “Grandma is with God” isn’t evidence of some hidden reset to 1980 cosmology. It’s just a soft-focus afterlife story for children. Christmas doesn’t rescue your claim either, it’s about an already past incarnation in their story, not your imaginary present-day hidden god-man.

If you want to critique Christianity, go after what Christians openly pray, teach, and write, not a story you made up and then insulated from criticism by saying “it’s unspoken.”

NHC
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Furthermore, I said that Christians secretly think that “Jesus” walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again. I never made any claims that they think it’s me and my 1980 story. Lmao.
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Furthermore, I said that Christians secretly think that “Jesus” walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again. I never made any claims that they think it’s me and my 1980 story. Lmao.

You’re dodging, not clarifying.

You did introduce that 1980-reset scenario as the supposed “other thing” they’d have to say, and then talked about “unspoken knowledge” sustaining the narrative. That’s why I called it out. If you now agree Christians don’t actually believe that, great then it shouldn’t be anywhere near your explanation of what’s “really” going on in their heads.

And your core claim still has the same problem:

“Christians secretly think that ‘Jesus’ walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again.”

You’ve got no doctrine, no liturgy, no surveys, no lived practice just you saying “they secretly think this” and then laughing it off with “Lmao” when pressed. No one said you claimed they think you are that guy; we’re saying you’re projecting a weird hidden belief onto millions of people with zero evidence.

If you want to be taken seriously, you need something more than, “They all secretly believe X, and the fact they don’t say it out loud is proof I’m right.”

NHC
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Furthermore, I said that Christians secretly think that “Jesus” walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again. I never made any claims that they think it’s me and my 1980 story. Lmao.

No one said you claimed they think you are that guy;
Good, I’m glad we cleared that up.
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Furthermore, I said that Christians secretly think that “Jesus” walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again. I never made any claims that they think it’s me and my 1980 story. Lmao.

You’re dodging, not clarifying.

You did introduce that 1980-reset scenario as the supposed “other thing” they’d have to say, and then talked about “unspoken knowledge” sustaining the narrative. That’s why I called it out. If you now agree Christians don’t actually believe that, great then it shouldn’t be anywhere near your explanation of what’s “really” going on in their heads.

And your core claim still has the same problem:

“Christians secretly think that ‘Jesus’ walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again.”

You’ve got no doctrine, no liturgy, no surveys, no lived practice just you saying “they secretly think this” and then laughing it off with “Lmao” when pressed. No one said you claimed they think you are that guy; we’re saying you’re projecting a weird hidden belief onto millions of people with zero evidence.

If you want to be taken seriously, you need something more than, “They all secretly believe X, and the fact they don’t say it out loud is proof I’m right.”

NHC
Like I said, it’s a secret because of people like you that don’t believe it. It’s all good. You don’t have to believe it.
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Furthermore, I said that Christians secretly think that “Jesus” walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again. I never made any claims that they think it’s me and my 1980 story. Lmao.

You’re dodging, not clarifying.

You did introduce that 1980-reset scenario as the supposed “other thing” they’d have to say, and then talked about “unspoken knowledge” sustaining the narrative. That’s why I called it out. If you now agree Christians don’t actually believe that, great then it shouldn’t be anywhere near your explanation of what’s “really” going on in their heads.

And your core claim still has the same problem:

“Christians secretly think that ‘Jesus’ walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again.”

You’ve got no doctrine, no liturgy, no surveys, no lived practice just you saying “they secretly think this” and then laughing it off with “Lmao” when pressed. No one said you claimed they think you are that guy; we’re saying you’re projecting a weird hidden belief onto millions of people with zero evidence.

If you want to be taken seriously, you need something more than, “They all secretly believe X, and the fact they don’t say it out loud is proof I’m right.”

NHC
Well, of course they’re not gonna speak the truth. They’ll look deranged.
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Furthermore, I said that Christians secretly think that “Jesus” walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again. I never made any claims that they think it’s me and my 1980 story. Lmao.

You’re dodging, not clarifying.

You did introduce that 1980-reset scenario as the supposed “other thing” they’d have to say, and then talked about “unspoken knowledge” sustaining the narrative. That’s why I called it out. If you now agree Christians don’t actually believe that, great then it shouldn’t be anywhere near your explanation of what’s “really” going on in their heads.

And your core claim still has the same problem:

“Christians secretly think that ‘Jesus’ walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again.”

You’ve got no doctrine, no liturgy, no surveys, no lived practice just you saying “they secretly think this” and then laughing it off with “Lmao” when pressed. No one said you claimed they think you are that guy; we’re saying you’re projecting a weird hidden belief onto millions of people with zero evidence.

If you want to be taken seriously, you need something more than, “They all secretly believe X, and the fact they don’t say it out loud is proof I’m right.”

NHC
Like I said, it’s a secret because of people like you that don’t believe it. It’s all good. You don’t have to believe it.

People like you don’t believe it, that’s why it’s a secret” isn’t an argument, it’s a magic trick.

You’ve gone from making a claim about what millions of Christians really believe to basically saying, it’s true because you can’t prove it isn’t, and if you ask for evidence, that’s proof it’s hidden. That’s not insight, that’s a self-sealing story.

You’re free to hold that belief, but let’s be honest about what’s happening, you’ve left the territory of psychology or theology and moved into “I just know this about everyone, and any challenge is why you can’t see it.” At that point, there’s nothing to debate—you’ve made yourself unfalsifiable, not persuasive.

NHC
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Furthermore, I said that Christians secretly think that “Jesus” walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again. I never made any claims that they think it’s me and my 1980 story. Lmao.

You’re dodging, not clarifying.

You did introduce that 1980-reset scenario as the supposed “other thing” they’d have to say, and then talked about “unspoken knowledge” sustaining the narrative. That’s why I called it out. If you now agree Christians don’t actually believe that, great then it shouldn’t be anywhere near your explanation of what’s “really” going on in their heads.

And your core claim still has the same problem:

“Christians secretly think that ‘Jesus’ walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again.”

You’ve got no doctrine, no liturgy, no surveys, no lived practice just you saying “they secretly think this” and then laughing it off with “Lmao” when pressed. No one said you claimed they think you are that guy; we’re saying you’re projecting a weird hidden belief onto millions of people with zero evidence.

If you want to be taken seriously, you need something more than, “They all secretly believe X, and the fact they don’t say it out loud is proof I’m right.”

NHC
Like I said, it’s a secret because of people like you that don’t believe it. It’s all good. You don’t have to believe it.

People like you don’t believe it, that’s why it’s a secret” isn’t an argument, it’s a magic trick.

You’ve gone from making a claim about what millions of Christians really believe to basically saying, it’s true because you can’t prove it isn’t, and if you ask for evidence, that’s proof it’s hidden. That’s not insight, that’s a self-sealing story.

You’re free to hold that belief, but let’s be honest about what’s happening, you’ve left the territory of psychology or theology and moved into “I just know this about everyone, and any challenge is why you can’t see it.” At that point, there’s nothing to debate—you’ve made yourself unfalsifiable, not persuasive.

NHC
I’m not here to change peoples minds. I’m here to tell people the truth. You can do what you want with it.
 
Ever listen to how excited an evangelistic preacher gets talking about how “Jesus” is in heaven and will return. Haha it’s so obvious. But I digress.
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Furthermore, I said that Christians secretly think that “Jesus” walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again. I never made any claims that they think it’s me and my 1980 story. Lmao.

You’re dodging, not clarifying.

You did introduce that 1980-reset scenario as the supposed “other thing” they’d have to say, and then talked about “unspoken knowledge” sustaining the narrative. That’s why I called it out. If you now agree Christians don’t actually believe that, great then it shouldn’t be anywhere near your explanation of what’s “really” going on in their heads.

And your core claim still has the same problem:

“Christians secretly think that ‘Jesus’ walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again.”

You’ve got no doctrine, no liturgy, no surveys, no lived practice just you saying “they secretly think this” and then laughing it off with “Lmao” when pressed. No one said you claimed they think you are that guy; we’re saying you’re projecting a weird hidden belief onto millions of people with zero evidence.

If you want to be taken seriously, you need something more than, “They all secretly believe X, and the fact they don’t say it out loud is proof I’m right.”

NHC
Like I said, it’s a secret because of people like you that don’t believe it. It’s all good. You don’t have to believe it.

People like you don’t believe it, that’s why it’s a secret” isn’t an argument, it’s a magic trick.

You’ve gone from making a claim about what millions of Christians really believe to basically saying, it’s true because you can’t prove it isn’t, and if you ask for evidence, that’s proof it’s hidden. That’s not insight, that’s a self-sealing story.

You’re free to hold that belief, but let’s be honest about what’s happening, you’ve left the territory of psychology or theology and moved into “I just know this about everyone, and any challenge is why you can’t see it.” At that point, there’s nothing to debate—you’ve made yourself unfalsifiable, not persuasive.

NHC
I’m not here to change peoples minds. I’m here to tell people the truth. You can do what you want with it.

If you’re not here to change minds, then you’re not showing truth, you’re just asserting it and walking away when asked to back it up. Anyone can say, “I know what millions of people secretly believe, it’s just the truth.” Flat-Earthers, cult leaders, conspiracy guys all talk like that.

You’re free to believe whatever story you like, but once you refuse evidence, argument, or any way your claim could be wrong, you’re not describing reality you’re just protecting a belief.

NHC
 
Concerning Christ, I'm certain that many followers secretly believe that “Jesus” resides on Earth and that, upon His death, all existence will end and begin again with his "rebirth." Notice Jesus in quotes. The Christian conviction that He is alive in "heaven" now, poised to resurrect the dead and usher in a new Heaven and Earth speaks volumes, in my estimation. In the present day, a man exhibiting a messianic tendency is deemed mentally unsound; yet, for reasons "unknown," Christians do not apply this judgment to Jesus. I surmise that Christianity’s magnitude renders it impervious to scrutiny, and individuals shy away from the prospect of being perceived as irrational for asserting that “Jesus” walks the Earth. Thus, there lies a collective refuge in attributing such divinity to the figure described in the sacred text provided by God.

You’re making way too many claims you never actually back up.

Most Christians do not secretly believe “Jesus is currently living on Earth and when he dies everything ends.” That’s just not their doctrine. They believe he already died, rose, and is alive in heaven until the end of the age. If you’re going to critique Christianity, at least hit what they actually teach, not a fan-fic version of it.

The “reasons unknown” line is doing a lot of work too. We don’t treat a modern guy who says “I’m the messiah” the same as a figure embedded in a 2,000-year-old religious tradition with texts, liturgy, and a whole interpretive history around him. You can absolutely say that tradition is wrong or irrational but that’s not the same thing as pretending people are just scared to notice he’d be “mentally unsound” today.

And Christianity is not “impervious to scrutiny.” It’s been torn apart, defended, revised, and argued over by believers and nonbelievers alike for centuries. If anything, your paragraph shows how easy it is to avoid real scrutiny by psychologizing believers and attributing a “collective refuge” instead of engaging their actual claims.

NHC
When a child asks a parent, “What happens when you die?” the parent often responds that the deceased go to be with God. It’s a comforting answer, Yet, this unspoken knowledge sustains the Christian narrative. Cultural traditions like Christmas further reinforce this, weaving a story that’s easier to accept than to challenge. Every culture has its way of shielding children from such unsettling ideas, preserving faith through simplified tales of the afterlife.

Nothing in mainstream Christianity says, “There’s a man secretly living on Earth right now who is God incarnate, and when he dies reality will reset to 1980.” That’s your head canon, not their doctrine, not their creeds, not their sermons. You keep inventing a bizarre belief, then treating the lack of evidence for it as proof it’s “secret.”

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Never said that’s what Christianity says. What I said was: “but what else could they say? That nothing happens, but there’s a man on Earth who is God incarnate, orchestrating existence, and upon his death, all reality will reset to 1980 with him reborn as a child?” So don’t put words in my mouth. Thanks.

Furthermore, I said that Christians secretly think that “Jesus” walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again. I never made any claims that they think it’s me and my 1980 story. Lmao.

You’re dodging, not clarifying.

You did introduce that 1980-reset scenario as the supposed “other thing” they’d have to say, and then talked about “unspoken knowledge” sustaining the narrative. That’s why I called it out. If you now agree Christians don’t actually believe that, great then it shouldn’t be anywhere near your explanation of what’s “really” going on in their heads.

And your core claim still has the same problem:

“Christians secretly think that ‘Jesus’ walks the Earth now and when he dies all existence ends and begins again.”

You’ve got no doctrine, no liturgy, no surveys, no lived practice just you saying “they secretly think this” and then laughing it off with “Lmao” when pressed. No one said you claimed they think you are that guy; we’re saying you’re projecting a weird hidden belief onto millions of people with zero evidence.

If you want to be taken seriously, you need something more than, “They all secretly believe X, and the fact they don’t say it out loud is proof I’m right.”

NHC
Like I said, it’s a secret because of people like you that don’t believe it. It’s all good. You don’t have to believe it.

People like you don’t believe it, that’s why it’s a secret” isn’t an argument, it’s a magic trick.

You’ve gone from making a claim about what millions of Christians really believe to basically saying, it’s true because you can’t prove it isn’t, and if you ask for evidence, that’s proof it’s hidden. That’s not insight, that’s a self-sealing story.

You’re free to hold that belief, but let’s be honest about what’s happening, you’ve left the territory of psychology or theology and moved into “I just know this about everyone, and any challenge is why you can’t see it.” At that point, there’s nothing to debate—you’ve made yourself unfalsifiable, not persuasive.

NHC
I’m not here to change peoples minds. I’m here to tell people the truth. You can do what you want with it.

If you’re not here to change minds, then you’re not showing truth, you’re just asserting it and walking away when asked to back it up. Anyone can say, “I know what millions of people secretly believe, it’s just the truth.” Flat-Earthers, cult leaders, conspiracy guys all talk like that.

You’re free to believe whatever story you like, but once you refuse evidence, argument, or any way your claim could be wrong, you’re not describing reality you’re just protecting a belief.

NHC
Well, it’s clear that you think that Christians actually believe a man rose from the grave 2000 years ago, is in heaven now at the right hand of God waiting to judge the world and bring forth a new heaven and a new earth.

Have a good day.

P.S. I’m not here to judge anybody. I’m here to live my life God gave me. Hahaha
 
Well, of course they’re not gonna speak the truth. They’ll look deranged.
Sure, because saying instead that they eat the body and drink the blood of a Jewish guy who died a couple of thousand years ago, who is his own father, was born of a virgin, and came back to life three days after his death, doesn't make them look deranged at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom