• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

170 hostages taken in Mali

Metaphor

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
12,378
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/wor...ostages-reportedly-taken-20151120-gl4d77.html

Up to 10 gunmen have reportedly taken 170 hostages at the Hotel Radisson Blue in the Mali capital of Bamako.​

Gunmen shouted "Allahu Akbar" ("God is great") as they stormed the Radisson Blu hotel in Bamako at about 7am local time, a security source told Reuters.

They are holding 140 guests and 30 employees, according ot a statement from the hotel's parent company Rezidor Group.

Rezidor said it understood that there were two gunmen.

The gunmen have reportedly released some hostages, reportedly those who could recite verses of the Koran, according to Reuters' security source.

Now before anyone gets her panties in a bunch, remember, this has nothing to do with religion.
 
This was a risky plan. What were they planning to do if it turned out everyone in there could quote the Qur'an? "OK, guys, our mistake, let's just all go home".

Also, what do they want? To make it to the first page?
 
Was it a quote from the Koran, so that anyone who knew a line could go or did they have a series of skill testing questions so that some got "Who was the angel that talked to Mohammed?" and others got "Mohammed defeated the King of Mercia in 514AD - name that king's dog"? The second one would be kind of unfair.
 
Was it a quote from the Koran, so that anyone who knew a line could go or did they have a series of skill testing questions so that some got "Who was the angel that talked to Mohammed?" and others got "Mohammed defeated the King of Mercia in 514AD - name that king's dog"? The second one would be kind of unfair.
The answer to both is Gabriel.
 
Not only does this have nothing to do with religion, but christians are just as bad.
 
Was it a quote from the Koran, so that anyone who knew a line could go or did they have a series of skill testing questions so that some got "Who was the angel that talked to Mohammed?" and others got "Mohammed defeated the King of Mercia in 514AD - name that king's dog"? The second one would be kind of unfair.
The answer to both is Gabriel.
The judges would also have accepted "Scooby Doo", "Sarah Jessica Barker", and "Snuffles".
 
I wonder how a gunman would react if a hostage quoted some of the pacific or anti-oppression Quranic passages. Would he see the error of his ways and slink off chastened, or shoot the wise ass between his eyes?
 
I wonder how a gunman would react if a hostage quoted some of the pacific or anti-oppression Quranic passages. Would he see the error of his ways and slink off chastened, or shoot the wise ass between his eyes?

I assume shooting him between the eyes would have been the default response. I doubt they were interested in listening to people trying to be clever.
 
Also, what do they want? To make it to the first page?

They want revenge, obviously. People don't like to admit this for some reason.
 
Last edited:
Now before anyone gets her panties in a bunch, remember, this has nothing to do with religion.
If it' ISIL then I'm not so sure

The reality is that the Islamic State is Islamic. Very Islamic. Yes, it has attracted psychopaths and adventure seekers, drawn largely from the disaffected populations of the Middle East and Europe. But the religion preached by its most ardent followers derives from coherent and even learned interpretations of Islam.

Virtually every major decision and law promulgated by the Islamic State adheres to what it calls, in its press and pronouncements, and on its billboards, license plates, stationery, and coins, “the Prophetic methodology,” which means following the prophecy and example of Muhammad, in punctilious detail. Muslims can reject the Islamic State; nearly all do. But pretending that it isn’t actually a religious, millenarian group, with theology that must be understood to be combatted, has already led the United States to underestimate it and back foolish schemes to counter it. We’ll need to get acquainted with the Islamic State’s intellectual genealogy if we are to react in a way that will not strengthen it, but instead help it self-immolate in its own excessive zeal.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/
 
Oh, what? Now we're trusting ISIS to tell the truth?

They're radical religious zealot terrorists, FFS. Why should we believe a word they're saying about their radical religious zealot terrorism?
 
I wonder how a gunman would react if a hostage quoted some of the pacific or anti-oppression Quranic passages. Would he see the error of his ways and slink off chastened, or shoot the wise ass between his eyes?

He'd probably go all Samuel L. Jackson on the guy, and quote some verse about "great vengeance" before drilling him.
 
They could probably just make something up.

"And thou shall till thy fields, and they shall grow thee a great bounty when tilled upon the words of The Prophet.
Umm, Qu'ran... I forget it exactly, but it always used to make me think of my dad."

The gunmen, likely similar to American Christians who seem to believe that the creator of the universe spoke in Elizabethan English, would stammer around for a second and say, "Yeah, I've always liked that one too... Um, Okay. You can go."
 
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/wor...ostages-reportedly-taken-20151120-gl4d77.html

Up to 10 gunmen have reportedly taken 170 hostages at the Hotel Radisson Blue in the Mali capital of Bamako.​

Gunmen shouted "Allahu Akbar" ("God is great") as they stormed the Radisson Blu hotel in Bamako at about 7am local time, a security source told Reuters.

They are holding 140 guests and 30 employees, according ot a statement from the hotel's parent company Rezidor Group.

Rezidor said it understood that there were two gunmen.

The gunmen have reportedly released some hostages, reportedly those who could recite verses of the Koran, according to Reuters' security source.

Now before anyone gets her panties in a bunch, remember, this has nothing to do with religion.

Or radical Islam. No such thing according to the newspeak in Washington.
 
Oh, what? Now we're trusting ISIS to tell the truth?

They're radical religious zealot terrorists, FFS. Why should we believe a word they're saying about their radical religious zealot terrorism?
Same reason you'd believe what David Koresh said
 
Oh, what? Now we're trusting ISIS to tell the truth?

They're radical religious zealot terrorists, FFS. Why should we believe a word they're saying about their radical religious zealot terrorism?
Same reason you'd believe what David Koresh said

I don't see why David Koresh would be any kind of authority on ISIS's philosophy at all. :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom