• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

#20minutesofaction

Keep marginalizing these muslims, Derec. It is key for them to be able to rape with the progressive stack making it less evil than the Brock Turners ;)
 
I'm not going to try to watch that video. It looks stupid,
You really should. It's a funny video.
I'm sure if there's a valid point in there somewhere you can spell it out for me.
It's basically a satire about how radical Islam and radical feminism are surprisingly alike. At the end the Islamist asks the feminist whether she minds to rape her now and she replies "Oh, don't be silly, it's not rape when a Muslim does it".

The linked article is about one case in Sweden.
And this thread is about one case in California.
By itself it does not support any claims about Muslims in general.
It does, together with other such cases, say a lot about attitude toward Muslim migrants who commit serious crimes. This guy not only got away with no jail time at all, he is not even being deported.

And in that one case, the rapist was caught and prosecuted in accordance with Swedish law, which is what the Swedish authorities have said they intend to do with Assange. Nothing lackadaisical about that.
When somebody rapes a 13 year old girl and gets no jail time and does not get deported that is pretty lackadaisical. When a guy is hounded for years over rather dubious claims of sub-rape sexual assault that stands in stark contrast to how this Muslim migrant is being treated.

The article says the court believed the perpetrator's claim that he was 17 years old at the time of the crime and that "he was sentenced as a minor".

And now that they know his real age, why isn't he being resentenced? Why isn't he being deported?
And more relevant to this thread, why isn't there much more outrage against him than there is against Turner?
Let's recap:
- they are of similar age.
- the Muslim (let's call him Abdullah [slave of Allah, very fitting] since no name is given) committed a much more serious crime (rape of a 13 year old girl) than Turner (sexual assault on an adult woman).
- Turner received a much harsher punishment than Abdul - three months in jail (vs. no time in jail), three years probation and life-long registration on the sex offender list.
- If Turner weren't a citizen he would have most likely been deported after serving his jail sentence. Abdul gets to stay in Sweden.

So why all the hyperbolic outrage against Turner but virtually no outrage against Abdul?

So, the court believes he's a juvenile and has sentenced him accordingly. That's entirely different from your claim about the court not punishing him for rape because he's Muslim.
And why are they so quick to believe his lies about his age? Why aren't they resentencing him now that his lies are known? And why isn't there outrage by the same feminist Left who is so outraged by Turner getting "only" three months in jail?
Muslim getting no jail time is presumably ok because he receives "Muslim bonus" by so-called progressives who are in reality regressives.

What they do with juveniles, immigrants, and rapists in Sweden has no bearing on whether Turner's sentence was appropriate.
Of course it does. If you are going to be outraged about a 20 year old getting three months for assaulting another 20 year old while they were both drunk how can you not be outraged about a 20 year old outright raping a 13 year old child and receiving no jail time at all? Selective outrage for non-Muslim offenders only. It's not rape if a Muslim does it.

Playball40 linked this article in the Lounge. It contains comments from a man who was wrongfully accused and convicted of rape when he was a teenager.
He got a rough deal. But he should be blaming the lying bitch who falsely accused him of rape. Btw, she was never prosecuted. Another outrage in our society - false accusers very rarely get prosecuted and even then face very mild punishment.
 
You really should. It's a funny video.
I'm sure if there's a valid point in there somewhere you can spell it out for me.
It's basically a satire about how radical Islam and radical feminism are surprisingly alike. At the end the Islamist asks the feminist whether she minds to rape her now and she replies "Oh, don't be silly, it's not rape when a Muslim does it".
I wonder how deranged one has to be to find that funny.
If you are going to be outraged about a 20 year old getting three months for assaulting another 20 year old while they were both drunk how can you not be outraged about a 20 year old outright raping a 13 year old child and receiving no jail time at all? Selective outrage for non-Muslim offenders only. It's not rape if a Muslim does it.
Can you point to anyone who knew about that incident who was not outraged but was outraged by Turner's slap on the wrist?
 
You really should. It's a funny video.

It's basically a satire about how radical Islam and radical feminism are surprisingly alike. At the end the Islamist asks the feminist whether she minds to rape her now and she replies "Oh, don't be silly, it's not rape when a Muslim does it".
I wonder how deranged one has to be to find that funny.


I don't wonder at all.
 
Can you point to anyone who knew about that incident who was not outraged but was outraged by Turner's slap on the wrist?
Arctish is full of apologetics for the "no jail time for Muslim child rapist" decision.
And it is hardly an isolated case. Remember Rotterham?
 
Arctish is full of apologetics for the "no jail time for Muslim child rapist" decision.
I don't see it. Show me what you mean.
Read his posts.

And it is hardly an isolated case. Remember Rotterham?
No, I don't.
It involved widespread Muslim child sexual abuse that was hushed up by the authorities because of political correctness.
 Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal
 
Can you point to anyone who knew about that incident who was not outraged but was outraged by Turner's slap on the wrist?
Arctish is full of apologetics for the "no jail time for Muslim child rapist" decision.
And it is hardly an isolated case. Remember Rotterham?

It wasn't apologetics. It was pointing out that only source of information on this case refuted your claims about it, and that your posts about Muslims, feminists, and Swedish rape laws are off topic. If you want to talk about Muslims in Sweden you can start a new thread. This discussion is about the Turner case and the leniency of the sentence handed down Judge Persky.
 
Since Derec is now derailing his own derail, I might as well derail the Rotterham derail-derail, by saying the Catholic church is worse or at the least just as bad. Thank you.
 
Since Derec is now derailing his own derail,
As usual, you are wrong. I did not bring up the case of the Muslim rapist and Rotterham is not a derail anyway.

I might as well derail the Rotterham derail-derail, by saying the Catholic church is worse or at the least just as bad. Thank you.
And again you are wrong. How do you do it so consistently?
 
It wasn't apologetics. It was pointing out that only source of information on this case refuted your claims about it,
No it did not. It identified the perp as 20 years old, the same age as Brock Turner. Yet he gets no outrage for no jail time even though his crime was much more severe.
and that your posts about Muslims, feminists, and Swedish rape laws are off topic.
1. I did not bring up that case.
2. I think it is definitely on topic as the comparison between overblown outrage against Brock Turner (who is being treated as public enemy number one) and lack of outrage against even lighter sentences against Muslim rapists. And it's hardly the only case. But the feminist Left is only outraged when non-Muslim whites do it.
This discussion is about the Turner case and the leniency of the sentence handed down Judge Persky.
So lack of outrage when Muslims get far more leniency is off topic? My question to you and other leftists on here is why such selective outrage?
 
No it did not. It identified the perp as 20 years old, the same age as Brock Turner. Yet he gets no outrage for no jail time even though his crime was much more severe.
and that your posts about Muslims, feminists, and Swedish rape laws are off topic.
1. I did not bring up that case.
2. I think it is definitely on topic as the comparison between overblown outrage against Brock Turner (who is being treated as public enemy number one) and lack of outrage against even lighter sentences against Muslim rapists. And it's hardly the only case. But the feminist Left is only outraged when non-Muslim whites do it.
This discussion is about the Turner case and the leniency of the sentence handed down Judge Persky.
So lack of outrage when Muslims get far more leniency is off topic? My question to you and other leftists on here is why such selective outrage?

I will go ahead and say it, the case referenced in Sweden is outrageous, regardless of whether the perp was identified as 17 or 20 years old when he went to trial. It wasn't a case of statutory rape, it was a full on brutal rape. Given that this occurred in Sweden, rather than California, or any other State in the US, I think it can safely be said that this is a failure of the Swedish legal system. That same perp would have been tried as an adult in the US, and would not have gotten off with such a light sentence (unless he was from an affluent family like Turner).
 
But the feminist Left is only outraged when non-Muslim whites do it.

You only THINK that because every time you see a feminist mention patriarchy, you post a stupid meme and don't think:
"Patriarchy", the favorite word of radical feminists.
tumblr_mzk2rrNT5g1sek2a3o1_500.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom