Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 49,901
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
I have no idea where the thread on the Trump Organization fraud case exists, so this can be moved there is needed.
NY Appeals Court ruled, somehow in a 2 v 2 v 1 sort of way, that the fine was too high, but Trump was guilty. BUT...
As the ruling keeps the conviction and removes the fine, both parties may likely appeal to the State Supreme Court. No idea where the heck this ends.
NY Appeals Court ruled, somehow in a 2 v 2 v 1 sort of way, that the fine was too high, but Trump was guilty. BUT...
This would make the NY Times' note of the ruling being "convoluted" quite accurate.article said:Justice Moulton’s opinion upholding the case and wiping out the financial penalties received one additional vote, from the chief judge, Dianne Renwick.
Another judge, David Friedman, who has been skeptical of the accusations for years, wanted to throw the case out entirely, believing Ms. James had lacked the power to bring it.
Two other judges concluded that Ms. James had the authority to file the case, but wanted to provide Mr. Trump a new trial.
As the ruling keeps the conviction and removes the fine, both parties may likely appeal to the State Supreme Court. No idea where the heck this ends.