• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

A day without stupid?

 
 
 
ZiprHead said:
A tale of two Easter Greetings:

“As we reflect today on Christ’s Resurrection, we are reminded that with faith, hope, and love — even death can be defeated,” the president tweeted. “From our family to yours, we wish you hope, health, joy, and the peace of God, which passes all understanding. Happy Easter and may God bless and keep you.”

“Happy Easter to all including the Radical Left Maniacs who are trying everything to destroy our country. May they not succeed, but let them, nevertheless, be happy, healthy, wealthy and well!”

You choose who said which one.
Click to expand...
1) Biden
2) Trump
 
www.thedailybeast.com

Trump Fears Hecklers Wielding ‘Very Dangerous’ Killer Fruits

In new deposition transcripts, Trump defended encouraging rally attendees to beat up hypothetical protesters wielding tomatoes by claiming that projectile fruits can be lethal.
www.thedailybeast.com

Well, this is bananas.

According to former President Donald Trump, hurling a fruit at someone can be a lethal act—one that justifies the use of violence to thwart any use of produce as projectile.

In transcripts of an October 2021 deposition, filed in court on Tuesday, the twice-impeached former president insisted tomatoes, pineapples, and bananas can be “very dangerous” weapons that justify violent acts of “self-defense.” (Elsewhere in the just-released deposition, The Daily Beast reported, Trump admitted he personally oversaw the pay of a Trump Organization exec whose corporate perks have come under legal scrutiny in a tax fraud case.)
Click to expand...
 
Sen. Collins, please take a bow.

artcile said:
“If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office,” Collins said in a statement. “Obviously, we won’t know each Justice’s decision and reasoning until the Supreme Court officially announces its opinion in this case.”
Click to expand...
Gee... I wonder if justices selected by others for Trump to appoint would be against Roe v Wade.
 
Jimmy Higgins said:
Sen. Collins, please take a bow.

artcile said:
“If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office,” Collins said in a statement. “Obviously, we won’t know each Justice’s decision and reasoning until the Supreme Court officially announces its opinion in this case.”
Click to expand...
Gee... I wonder if justices selected by others for Trump to appoint would be against Roe v Wade.
Click to expand...
It's entirely possible Americans who live in Maine have finally learned their lesson.
 
"Biden’s focus is on the tobacco industry being immune from prostitutes being sued"
-Bobblehead Boebert

That should make Derec happy.
I think?
No, wait ...
Maybe?
 
Breaking wind! Er, news! According to one of his staffers, Donald Trump thought that China had developed a hurricane gun to create storms and direct them at the U.S.A. Story here.
 
That's Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, and therefore head of the New World Order, because they both have world in the name.

Zelensky is a suitable heir to the NWO throne, being a fanatical globalist.

Also, Putin is an anti-globalist and anti-fascist hero.
 
blastula said:
That's Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, and therefore head of the New World Order, because they both have world in the name.

Zelensky is a suitable heir to the NWO throne, being a fanatical globalist.

Also, Putin is an anti-globalist and anti-fascist hero.
Click to expand...
Wow. I'm a little impressed Jnr would know who that was.
 
talkingpointsmemo.com

Michigan GOP Guv Candidates Could Be Disqualified Over Forged Signatures

A state review of thousands of allegedly fraudulent signatures was released Monday.
talkingpointsmemo.com
A signature forgery scandal has turned the race for the GOP nomination to be Michigan’s next governor on its head: Two leading Republican candidates did not collect enough signatures to qualify for the primary ballot after invalid signatures were excluded, according to a report from the state’s Bureau of Elections.

The Bureau of Elections reports will now go to the Board of State Canvassers, which will vote Thursday on which candidates qualify to appear on the ballot for the state’s Aug. 2 primaries.

Thirty-six petition circulators — campaign workers hired to collect signatures — “submitted fraudulent petition sheets consisting entirely of invalid signatures,” according to the Bureau. In all, according to the Bureau’s report Monday, these circulators submitted at least 68,000 invalid signatures across nominating petitions for 10 candidates.

Both leading Republican candidates submitted well above the 15,000 signatures necessary, but were subsequently hit with complaints that that counts contained fraudulent signatures.
Click to expand...
 
article said:
“The staff of the Democrat Secretary of Staff [sic] does not have the right to unilaterally void every single signature obtained by the alleged forgers who victimized five campaigns,” John Yob, a consultant for Johnson, wrote on Twitter, adding: “We strongly believe they are refusing to count thousands of signatures from legitimate voters who signed the petitions and look forward to winning this fight before the Board, and if necessary, in the courts.”
Click to expand...
So, they admit someone forged signatures, but they shouldn't be punished for it. Personally, I think it is a ridiculous thing to have to get signatures en masse to run. It'd probably make more sense to have to get a handful of signatures in X% of the state counties.

But these rules were created for some reason and the right-wing demands rules be followed to the fullest extent possible... except when it impacts them... and then officials should treat the situation differently (fairly).
 
Jimmy Higgins said:
article said:
“The staff of the Democrat Secretary of Staff [sic] does not have the right to unilaterally void every single signature obtained by the alleged forgers who victimized five campaigns,” John Yob, a consultant for Johnson, wrote on Twitter, adding: “We strongly believe they are refusing to count thousands of signatures from legitimate voters who signed the petitions and look forward to winning this fight before the Board, and if necessary, in the courts.”
Click to expand...
So, they admit someone forged signatures, but they shouldn't be punished for it. Personally, I think it is a ridiculous thing to have to get signatures en masse to run. It'd probably make more sense to have to get a handful of signatures in X% of the state counties.

But these rules were created for some reason and the right-wing demands rules be followed to the fullest extent possible... except when it impacts them... and then officials should treat the situation differently (fairly).
Click to expand...
Republicans once again proving there is voter fraud.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom