Dekusta
New member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2015
- Messages
- 48
- Location
- Goiânia
- Basic Beliefs
- Find out what morality is should be our concern. If we are wrong, then we have to stop.
As many of you might know, Paul Cameron's (and the Family Reaearch Institute's) anti-gay arguments have been debunked over and over by many blogs out there, such as the Box Turtle Bulletin. His methodology is so flawed and so terrible that most people who ever quoted him apologized afterwards.
My point of concern is about the possibility of dismissing a study by the FRI based on the past obvious, terrible mistakes they made.
There is one study (that I know) who hasn't been discussed yet (as far as I know). Can it be dismissed simply because it's Paul Cameron? Is the ad-hominem in this case justified?
(The study in question is"Homosexual Rape and Murder of Children", published in Journal of the Family Research Institute, Vol. 18 No. 1, Feb 2003.
The researches claim that 69% of the serial killers in this study were homosexuals (i.e., people who were self-described homosexuals or people who had engaged in homosexual behavior immediately prior to, during, or after committing their murders)".
My point of concern is about the possibility of dismissing a study by the FRI based on the past obvious, terrible mistakes they made.
There is one study (that I know) who hasn't been discussed yet (as far as I know). Can it be dismissed simply because it's Paul Cameron? Is the ad-hominem in this case justified?
(The study in question is"Homosexual Rape and Murder of Children", published in Journal of the Family Research Institute, Vol. 18 No. 1, Feb 2003.
The researches claim that 69% of the serial killers in this study were homosexuals (i.e., people who were self-described homosexuals or people who had engaged in homosexual behavior immediately prior to, during, or after committing their murders)".