• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

AOC loses secret ballot for a seat on powerful House committee - Axios
Driving the news: I'm told Ocasio-Cortez lost the vote by the House Democratic Steering Committee because she didn't personally ask for enough votes, and because some members fear she'll support a primary against them from the left.

Rice worked the committee, tightly controlled by Speaker Pelosi, and was showered with seconding speeches.
So it's KR 3 terms, AOC 1 term. That can be a problem in a body that works by seniority.

Rice selected over Ocasio-Cortez for spot on Energy & Commerce panel | TheHill
Rice, a third-term centrist Democrat, and Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive firebrand, both jockeyed heavily for one of the few coveted slots on the committee. But the Steering Committee — which is tasked with selecting who heads and sits on committees — ultimately selected only Rice, the more senior lawmaker, to serve on the panel.

“It is an honor to be selected by my Democratic colleagues to serve on the Energy and Commerce Committee in the 117th Congress," Rice said.

...
Both lawmakers have at times been at odds with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), with Pelosi previously blocking Rice from getting a position on the Judiciary Committee after the New York lawmaker opted not to support Pelosi for Speaker in 2019 and played a role in an attempt to oust Pelosi from her leadership role two years ago.
 
The Establishment Strikes Back - The American Prospect
Committee assignments are one of the least eye-catching parts of politics, but they’re also one of the most important ways in which actual political power is wielded. Certain committees in the House, like Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Appropriations, have outsized influence and money power. (They are often called the “money” committees, not just because they’re where the action is but because members can earn lots of money in campaign contributions from industries with business before them.)
That E&C seat was vacated by Eliot Engel, who was primaried by Jamaal Bowman. After describing how KR came out at the last minute,
A similar situation existed with the Energy and Commerce Committee seat vacated by incoming New Mexico Sen. Ben Ray Lujan. That seat was expected to go to progressive Texan Sylvia Garcia, but was contested by her moderate colleague from Texas, Lizzie Fletcher. Garcia, the other priority for progressives in Energy and Commerce, was left off the slate without even a vote. Fletcher, who has a troubling track record on unions, got endorsed by Pelosi. The Texas AFL-CIO famously came out against Fletcher’s candidacy for Congress, and declined to endorse her even against a Republican incumbent.
Both AOC and SG lost.

AOC made an enemy in Henry Cuellar, by backing primary challenger Jessica Cisneros.
Cuellar won narrowly, with backing from the Koch political network and some last-minute campaigning from Speaker Pelosi herself, despite the fact that Cuellar regularly votes against the Democratic caucus and has routinely fundraised for Republicans. According to multiple people familiar with the proceedings, Ocasio-Cortez’s recent interview with The Intercept, where she said Speaker Pelosi needed to go, though there was no one to replace her, loomed over the proceedings.
HC supports Republicans??? What kind of Democrat is he???
 
'Working to shut out progressives': Here's how House Democrats blocked AOC from a key committee seat - Alternet.org
Reporting on Thursday's secret-ballot vote indicates that Ocasio-Cortez's support for Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, both of which would come under the purview of the Energy and Commerce Committee, was a factor in the vote to hand the seat to Rice, who does not support either progressive policy.

...
"It is very clear the party leadership is working to shut out progressives and has no intention of working with the left to 'build back better,'" argued journalist Walker Bragman, a contributor to The Daily Poster.

As The Intercept's Lee Fang pointed out on Twitter, all five of the Democrats chosen for Energy and Commerce seats "are pro-business New Dem caucus members, all beating progressives vying for seats."

"The moderate and conservative Dems are winning these early battles," noted Fang, "which will set the legislative agenda for the next two years."
 
Jimmy Dore and the Left’s Naïve Cynics Have Turned on AOC
Jimmy Dore is undeniably good at swearing. A left-wing comedian turned pundit, Dore has earned himself a considerable YouTube following by giving expletive-laden expression to the rage that many American progressives feel when contemplating their nation’s cruel and unusual political economy. But his gifts for political strategy are less clear-cut.

In 2016, Dore informed his audience that it should not “freak out about a Donald Trump presidency,” as the Republican’s election would be “even better for progressives in the short term, meaning in the two-year term, and in four years for sure” than Hillary Clinton’s election would be. No significant constituency on the American left — not trade unions, immigrant-rights groups, Black community institutions, nor health-care justice organizations — shared this assessment.
But those constituencies seem to have been vindicated by 4 years of Trump as President. JD looks silly.

"Last month, Dore argued that AOC and her progressive allies can best advance the cause of universal health care by denying Nancy Pelosi the support she needs to retain the Speakership — until she agrees to hold a House vote on Medicare for All." He got some support from the likes of Krystal Ball, Kyle Kulinski, and Briahna Joy Gray, even if not for his criticism of AOC.

But it's doubtful that getting a floor vote for M4A would have gotten a M4A bill passed. AOC preferred other things, like committee assigments and ending the PAYGO rule (every bit of spending must be matched some tax increase and/or spending decrease elsewhere).

"The fact that this decision has earned AOC the enmity of some influential progressive commentators reflects a pathological tendency within a small subset of the U.S. left — namely, a habit of mining anti-political cynicism out of its own naïveté."

Author Eric Levitz then discussed BJG's case for it. She made fewer allegations of AOC's crypto-corporatism and did much better reasoning.


He then discusses some problems. "Public support for single-payer is broad but fragile." A lot of the support for M4A seems to be for a strong public option: Medicare for all who want it. A lot of M4A supporters think that they can keep their existing medical insurance.

"Big money can corrupt Democratic politicians. But it can also buy off public opinion."

"The case for pessimism of the intellect."

"This is not an apology for the Democratic Party or an endorsement of despair."

Ignoring the structural obstacles to single-payer’s passage, the fragility of public support for the policy, and the simple fact that people can share political values while earnestly disagreeing about the best way to advance them — all for the sake of declaring Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez an enemy of America’s uninsured — is a sound strategy for ginning up interest in your rant-based YouTube show. But it is also a recipe for converting your politically naïve viewers into anti-political cynics and making the U.S. left as self-deluded and internally divided as corporate America wishes for it to be.

I myself think that "forcing the vote" is a bad idea. I agree on AOC's priorities - she seems like she knows Congress from the inside, something not very surprising. It's also knowledge that many left-wing commentators and pundits lack. Like Jimmy Dore.
 
AOC's cooking live streams perfect the recipe for making politics palatable | Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez | The Guardian
Wearing a “tax the rich” sweater, the congresswoman was visibly more angry and frustrated than usual. “If people think that the present day is like radical far left, they just haven’t even opened a book,” she said with expressive hand gestures. “Like, we had much more radicalism in the United States as recently as the 60s.

“We talk about how labour unions started in this country. That was radical. People died, people died in this country, it was almost like a war for the 40-hour work week and your weekends. And a lot of people died for these very basic economic rights. We can’t go back to that time.”

She added: “Doubling the minimum wage should be normal. Guaranteed healthcare should be normal. Trying to save our planet should be centrist politics.”

She became even more irate as she talked about Covid-19. Hands resting on a plastic jug, she said animatedly: “Here’s the thing that’s also a huge irony to me, is that all these Republicans and all these folks who were anti-shutdown are the same people who weren’t wearing masks who forced us to shut down in the first place.”

The final 12 words of that sentence came in a rapid staccato, accompanied by Ocasio-Cortez’s left hand clapping or chopping her right for emphasis. “I wanna see my family,” she said. “I haven’t seen my family in a year, like many of you all. I wanna be able to visit my friends without being scared and I wanna be able to hang out with my friends when it’s cold outside and not have to be outside.”

If anyone was depending on AOC for their dinner that night, they were in for a long wait. Ilhan Omar, a fellow member of “the Squad” in Congress, teased her on Twitter: “@AOC you forgot to tell us what you were making tonight sis.”

Ocasio-Cortez confessed: “I tried to make salmon spinach pasta but got carried away about how jacked up our Covid response is and how badly we need stimulus checks and healthcare that all I did was zest a lemon I’ll post my meal when it’s done.”
 
The Distinct Political Paths of Barack Obama and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez | The New Yorker
But Obama and Ocasio-Cortez are the two politicians who in this century have managed to embody the qualities essential to the Democratic Party: youth and idealism, hope and change, the promise of a future different than the past. In elevating Ocasio-Cortez and gently criticizing her ideas, Obama opened up a different conversation—not just about the left and the center but about how a star politician ought to be, between one generational talent and another.
Part of AOC's success is, I think, being like what many people expected Obama to be. Instead of hope and change, she talks about a Green New Deal and Medicare for All.
When Obama decided to run for President, he had been in Washington for two years, almost exactly as long as Ocasio-Cortez has been there now. Nonetheless, in Obama’s account, he had the tacit support of many of the Party’s elders.
What did they see in him? Hard to say. He was in DC for only 2 years, then he decides to run for President.
Who are Ocasio-Cortez’s comrades? If any leading senators are taking her aside to tell her that she represents the future of the Party, no one’s given any public hint of it. Among Democrats, she often seems nearly alone.
She has some friends in Congress, like the three fellow members of "The Squad", but not very many. She's been at loggerheads with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Also the squabble about the Democrats' losses in the House. Centrist Abigail Spanberger complained about Republican attack ads featuring the likes of "Defund the Police", and AOC responded about inadequacies in a lot of campaigning. "A few days later, four progressive groups—New Deal Strategies, the Sunrise Movement, the Justice Democrats, and Data for Progress—produced a memo supporting Ocasio-Cortez’s contentions. These have been Ocasio-Cortez’s comrades: not the Democrats but the activists."

AOC is an activist at heart, and she identifies with activists, very unlike her predecessor, Joe Crowley, someone preoccupied with DC and party power politics. That is why he got the title "King of Queens".
A paradox of Ocasio-Cortez’s position is that her skills are not activist skills but mainstream ones. She delivers highly polished speeches. She finds connections between niche political news and the lives of working people. She can conjure a news cycle out of thin air—and then win it. An early risk in Ocasio-Cortez’s Washington career was that she would be seen strictly as an ingénue, but she turned her committee hearings into platforms to showcase her careful study of policy and incisive questioning.
Then how Joe Biden's campaigning has been remarkably progressive after he won the primaries as a moderate -- $15/hr minimum wage and a public option in medical insurance.
What were Obama’s and Spanberger’s arguments with Ocasio-Cortez about, anyway? Mostly, language. Neither has emphasized policy differences with the progressives; they were talking about talk. In their interview, Obama told Hamby that Ocasio-Cortez and Biden shared a desire for broad action on climate change, and implied that they were divided only by how to talk about it: “If you want to move people, they are moved by stories that connect with their own lives. They’re not moved by ideology.” This tendency to police language is part of what has always grated on the left about Obama. But it is also a sign of a winning hand. The paradox of Ocasio-Cortez’s position right now is that she isn’t isolated politically because she is losing. She is isolated politically because, on more substantive matters than it is in anyone’s interest to admit, she has already won.
Isolated because of winning?
 
Jimmy Dore is the worst, in 2016 he was idiotically saying there was no need to worry about SCOTUS because dems could just filibuster any nomination.
 
Jimmy Dore is the worst, in 2016 he was idiotically saying there was no need to worry about SCOTUS because dems could just filibuster any nomination.
When the Democrats tried that during George Bush II's Presidency, the Republicans threatened to abolish the filibuster, their "Nuclear Option".

Then when the Republicans filibustered them, the Democrats meekly let them until late in Obama's Presidency. But they revoked it only for appointments other than Supreme Court judges.

Then when Trump became President, they revoked it for Supreme Court judges. All that is left is legislation, it seems.
 
Corey Torpie on Instagram: ...
‘In the wealthiest nation in the world, working families shouldn’t have to struggle.’

@aoc pulls a cart of groceries in the Bronx this past May on one of many food distributions her campaign organized. Today she is a co-author of the Covid amendment for $2000 checks.

#teamaoc
Nice picture. She even ranted on Instagram about how little some of her fellow politicians were doing to help struggling Americans.
 
... all but ensuring the House Democratic Caucus will continue to be governed by the same octogenarian triumvirate that has occupied the party’s top three leadership roles for the past 14 years: the 80-year-old Pelosi, 81-year-old House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, and 80-year-old House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.).

I remember people making fun of the Soviet Union's gerontocratic leadership in the last years of that nation. But the US Democratic Party is now suffering from that.

Eighty may be "the new seventy-five" but those ages do seem ridiculous! Are there any younger stars to recommend for the top leadership?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I like to skim-read quickly but took a hiccup here:
NYMag ? said:
"The fact that this decision has earned AOC the enmity of some influential progressive commentators reflects a pathological tendency within a small subset of the U.S. left — namely, a habit of mining anti-political cynicism out of its own naïveté."
I suppose it would make more sense in context, and perhaps I'm just not a fan of frisky prose BUT ... am I the only one who had trouble understanding the "namely" phrase here? For starters, isn't "mining ... out" ambiguous?
 
I like to skim-read quickly but took a hiccup here:
NYMag ? said:
"The fact that this decision has earned AOC the enmity of some influential progressive commentators reflects a pathological tendency within a small subset of the U.S. left — namely, a habit of mining anti-political cynicism out of its own naïveté."
I suppose it would make more sense in context, and perhaps I'm just not a fan of frisky prose BUT ... am I the only one who had trouble understanding the "namely" phrase here? For starters, isn't "mining ... out" ambiguous?
I think that its intended meaning is "extracting" as in "extracting anti-political cynicism from its naïveté."

But I do think it fun that some people are calling AOC a sellout and a bourgeois reformist, using "bourgeois" in the Marxist dirty-word sense.
 
Isolated because of winning?

Winning like Charlie Sheen!

Since winning the civil war in the NY-14, what exactly has she won? Dems lost House seats in 2020 in part because her "socialism" brand sells poorly outside the fauxgressive base.

What about substance? M4A: DOA! GND: no way it will get passed, or implemented. The goals like drastically reducing carbon emissions by 2030 will not happen. Even more lofty goals like making air travel obsolete are just impossible.
So where is she winning exactly?
 
Mehdi Hasan on Twitter: ""You, after losing [to @AOC], went straight away & joined one of DC's biggest lobbying firms...so haven't you just vindicated AOC's main attack line against you?"

From my interview with ex-congressman Joe Crowley, who was defeated by AOC in 2018's primary https://t.co/x5Dpgqs9Pc" / Twitter


JC ducked the issue and said that he was earning a legitimate living.

He seems to be making a comeback.

Election 2020: Former NY Congressman Joe Crowley (D) joins RFL - YouTube - 2020 Nov 3
Mostly about the recent election. He made a reference to AOC at one point, saying that primarying safe-seat Democrats is not the way forward, but winning in swing seats. As if those activities are mutually exclusive.

Former U.S. Congressman on lessons Democrats can learn from 2020 - YouTube - 2020 Nov 5
He mentioned Michael Capuano being primaried - he was primaried by Ayanna Pressley. But he conceded that AOC has a lot of "talent".

Former NY Congressman Joe Crowley (D) on Trump Refusing To Concede or Help Biden's Transition - YouTube - 2020 Nov 23

The Battle for the Future of the Democratic Party | The Mehdi Hasan Show - YouTube - with Joe Crowley and Nina Turner

He discussed such things as how blue states have done better at COVID-19 relief than red states and how Congress seems intent on punishing them for that, and how well Nancy Pelosi has done as Speaker. Then where AOC slammed him for taking big money.

The rest of that interview was with Nina Turner, about her and her candidacy for OH-11.
 
NY Democratic boss warns AOC not to challenge Chuck Schumer
“I think it would be a primary driven by ambition more than by need,” Jay Jacobs told The Post.

“Chuck Schumer has been a progressive force in the state for decades,” added the chairman of the state Democratic committee. “She has a constituency that admires her and supports her, and they’re in her community, and I think it would be a loss for them if she were to do that.”

And he would beat her, he said.
I wonder if AOC enjoys watching people guess as to what her next move might be.
 
I like this:
Glenn Greenwald on Twitter: "Very interesting @AOC interview in NYT today ..." / Twitter
Very interesting @AOC interview in NYT today, where she says: "the history of the [Democratic] party tends to be that we get really excited about the grass roots to get elected. And then those communities are promptly abandoned right after an election."

She also says, amazingly, that she is often not sure she wants to stay in politics -- primarily because of cowardly, anonymous attacks (my characterization) from within her own Party, which often treats her as its enemy, someone to be banished: (quote below)

I understand the left has some valid critiques of AOC. I have some of my own. But she's in an impossible position - the huge platform & expectations means she's bound to disappoint some people sometimes - but, with Biden/Harris, the left needs critics from inside more than ever.

And whatever else is true, think about what it says about a Party that they would view someone like AOC -- with the unique reach & voice she's developed -- as a liability and threat to be exploited, then avoided and silenced, rather than one of its best assets. That's madness.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Biden’s Win, House Losses, and What’s Next for the Left - The New York Times
The congresswoman said Joe Biden’s relationship with progressives would hinge on his actions. And she dismissed criticism from House moderates, calling some candidates who lost their races “sitting ducks.”

...
AWH: Is there a universe in which they're hostile enough that we're
talking about a Senate run in a couple years?

AOC: I genuinely don't know. I don't even know if I want to be in politics. You know, for real, in the first six months of my term, I didn't even know if I was going to run for re-election this year.

AWH: Really? Why?

AOC: It's the incoming. It's the stress. It's the violence. It's the lack of support from your own party. It's your own party thinking you're the enemy. When your own colleagues talk anonymously in the press and then turn around and say you're bad because you actually append your name to your opinion.

I chose to run for re-election because I felt like I had to prove that this is real. That this movement was real. That I wasn't a fluke. That people really want guaranteed health care and that people really want the Democratic Party to fight for them.

But I'm serious when I tell people the odds of me running for higher office and the odds of me just going off trying to start a homestead somewhere - they're probably the same.
 
Greg M. Epstein on Twitter: "@AOC @RepRaskin As a chaplain who has worked a bit with Rep. Raskin, whom I so deeply admire, I want to share this long thread on grief that I created tonight for anyone who may be struggling with issues big or small. Sending you love and light. (link)" / Twitter
Linking to a long thread on grief. He is a Humanist Chaplain at Harvard University.

I'll quote a little bit of it.
Greg M. Epstein on Twitter: "What sparked me on the subject of grief ..." / Twitter
What sparked me on the subject of grief is the death of the 25 year-old son of one of the men I admire most. Jamie Raskin and his family: people who've truly dedicated their lives to others. Tommy Raskin, a young man @AOC called "an incredible beam of light." No words. Just pain.

...
Here's my greatest teacher, Sherwin Wine, a rabbi and a humanist—which I hope is fitting for Jamie Raskin and his family of Jewish freethinkers—on grieving death:

"Death needs courage. It is so overwhelmingly final that it fills our lives with dread and anxious fear. Sometimes it arrives at the end of a long life when we're waiting for it. But sometimes when it comes too soon, interrupting young lives and wasting hopes and dreams, it adds anger to our fear. We cry out at the injustice of destiny, wait f/answers that never seem to come. Courage is loving life even in the face of death. It is sharing our strength with others even when we feel weak. It is embracing our family and friends even when we fear to lose them. It is opening ourselves to love, even for the last time." -@humanisticjews founder Sherwin Wine

"...When a family member or intimate friend dies, sadness and despair are normal responses. Two people can't share the best & worst of life in mutual experience & find that absence is trivial. The tribute of love is the pain of separation." –Sherwin Wine

Gets me. every. time.
 
Back
Top Bottom