- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 41,246
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
Don't trust it until it can produce information about something that is to happen that only an insider can know.
Don't trust it until it can produce information about something that is to happen that only an insider can know.
Too much confirmation bias going around these days.
Sheep!Don't trust it until it can produce information about something that is to happen that only an insider can know.
Too much confirmation bias going around these days.
I've heard that there's too much confirmation bias going around these days. This post helps to validate my position on the matter.
There hasn't been a single day when Bannon wasn't hungover. Popping Advil, sunglasses indoors, chugging water, it's tragically obvious.
The tweets seem just too generic.There hasn't been a single day when Bannon wasn't hungover. Popping Advil, sunglasses indoors, chugging water, it's tragically obvious.
I believe it only because I want to.
The tweets seem just too generic.I believe it only because I want to.
That is exactly something Kellyanne Conway would (or did) say.It might be fake. But sometimes even forgeries can be valuable, when they emulate the real thing so closely that even the experts can't tell them apart.
If Melania files for divorce, I might believe it.
My heart bleeds for the trophy wife of a twice divorced man.If Melania files for divorce, I might believe it.
I wouldn't be surprised if the stuff in there about Melania is true. In fact, I feel sorry for her on some level. Bird in a gilded cage and all that.
The tweets seem just too generic.
Yeah, they are too believable and consistent with what we think is happening there.
The authenticity of the tweets aren't as important as the conversation they have started. And this is why it is important to ask why Steve Bannon is always drunk at work.Yeah, they are too believable and consistent with what we think is happening there.
Can't we go conservative and state them as fact and then when they are shown to be fake we continue to call them fact?
Yeah, they are too believable and consistent with what we think is happening there.
Can't we go conservative and state them as fact and then when they are shown to be fake we continue to call them fact?