• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Ann Coulter defends Nazi terrorist

Underseer

Contributor
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
11,413
Location
Chicago suburbs
Basic Beliefs
atheism, resistentialism
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-08-08.html

In Charlottesville, a Nazi terrorist left the protest, got into his car, and plowed it into a crowd of human beings, killing one and maiming others.

So of course Ann Coulter sides with the Nazi terrorist, because she is after all a conservolibertarian and is thus ideologically obligated to defend Nazis.
 
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-08-08.html

In Charlottesville, a Nazi terrorist left the protest, got into his car, and plowed it into a crowd of human beings, killing one and maiming others.

So of course Ann Coulter sides with the Nazi terrorist, because she is after all a conservolibertarian and is thus ideologically obligated to defend Nazis.

There is no evidence that she is libertarian. Why are you trying to claim libertarian support for her defense of your friends?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NMN
Dammit, Under! You made me click on a link and expose myself to Ann Coulter's convoluted logic. Curse you!
 
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-08-08.html

In Charlottesville, a Nazi terrorist left the protest, got into his car, and plowed it into a crowd of human beings, killing one and maiming others.

So of course Ann Coulter sides with the Nazi terrorist, because she is after all a conservolibertarian and is thus ideologically obligated to defend Nazis.

There is no evidence that she is libertarian. Why are you trying to claim libertarian support for her defense of your friends?

Would you like me to post the numerous links to libertarian sites that are against hate crimes? I really shouldn't have to because you portray yourself as a true believer, but I will if you need convincing.
 
Nice deflection.

Deflecting from something I didn't say? Why would someone do that?

Thank you for admitting that your comment about libertarian opposition to hate crime legislation was completely unrelated to anything that came before in this thread. Now we can get back to Underseer cheering Coulter's defense of Nazis.
 
Anne Coulter defends a Nazi terrorist and now there is a derail about an alleged misrepresentation of libertarians. One does have to wonder.
 
I read it and I didn't see the defense. I just saw a diatribe on what should be considered hate crime.
 
Coulter is a mentally hideous harpy. She does what the racists and religiturds here do all the time...fasten on some minor detail, and bend the conversation away from the real problem. To give the foul harridan her due, some of the things she cited should also have ben classed as hate crimes, but that doesn't make her stance any more acceptable.
 
I read it and I didn't see the defense. I just saw a diatribe on what should be considered hate crime.
You saw it. By saying that the charge against the Nazi is ridiculous, she is implicitly defending him against the federal charges. Her basic argument - that the feds are not charging him with murder - is stupid, since murder is a state not federal crime.
 
Anne Coulter defends a Nazi terrorist and now there is a derail about an alleged misrepresentation of libertarians. One does have to wonder.

I guess you didn't read the very first post where Underseer attributed libertarian ideas to Coulter in an attempt to imply that libertarians support Coulter's defense of Underseer's friends.
 
But the main thing, isn't it, is that Ann is sexEEEEE. That neck!! C'mon fellas. That cleavage. And ohhhh, that voice, almost like Bryn Mawr, but actually like a bossy high school junior who lives a few miles from Bryn Mawr and wants to be included. I don't think she cares if you think she's a fascist, as long as you think she's HOTTTTT. My favorite Ann moment was from a clip of her in front of a college audience, taking questions, and responding to a student question about the morality of what white settlers did to the Native Americans. Ann said it was meaningless to say we took their land, because they were a "bunch of nomads." About that same time a caller to a liberal radio show (Stephanie Miller -- is that the host's name? It's been so long since I've been able to get her on radio) called Ann "Blondie McProstate", which you gotta admit is pretty perfect. Trump couldn't craft a better epithet.
 
Anne Coulter defends a Nazi terrorist and now there is a derail about an alleged misrepresentation of libertarians. One does have to wonder.

I guess you didn't read the very first post where Underseer attributed libertarian ideas to Coulter in an attempt to imply that libertarians support Coulter's defense of Underseer's friends.
And the derail continues. One does have to wonder about priorities.
 
Anne Coulter defends a Nazi terrorist and now there is a derail about an alleged misrepresentation of libertarians. One does have to wonder.

I guess you didn't read the very first post where Underseer attributed libertarian ideas to Coulter in an attempt to imply that libertarians support Coulter's defense of Underseer's friends.
And the derail continues. One does have to wonder about priorities.

If correcting an error in the OP is a derail, one is forced to wonder what isn't a derail. Perhaps it is saying "yes yes I agree" to every OP.
 
And the derail continues. One does have to wonder about priorities.

If correcting an error in the OP is a derail, one is forced to wonder what isn't a derail. Perhaps it is saying "yes yes I agree" to every OP.
It's almost as if you want deflect from the OP topic - Ann Coulter's comments. One does wonder about about priorities.
 
And the derail continues. One does have to wonder about priorities.

If correcting an error in the OP is a derail, one is forced to wonder what isn't a derail. Perhaps it is saying "yes yes I agree" to every OP.
It's almost as if you want deflect from the OP topic - Ann Coulter's comments. One does wonder about about priorities.

I don't give a shit about Ann Coulter's comments. Someone who has nothing in common with me said something about someone who has nothing in common with me. If you could show that what she said was wrong then maybe I'd care because as much as I don't care if a group I don't belong in attacks another group I don't belong in I do care that they do so fairly and honestly.

You seem to care a lot about both what Ann Coulter said and that I don't care about it.
 
It's almost as if you want deflect from the OP topic - Ann Coulter's comments. One does wonder about about priorities.

I don't give a shit about Ann Coulter's comments. ...
Thank you for admitting you are deflecting from the OP topic. You have made it clear that it is more important to you to whine about some alleged slight to libertarians than someone making a bogus argument to charges reduced against a Nazi.
 
Back
Top Bottom