southernhybrid
Contributor
Well, to get a little bit serious here, I wondered if the prince would be protected by diplomatic immunity if he travels to Argentina, but according to some of the articles that I've been reading on that subject for the past 30 minutes, there is the possibility that a precedent was set when some of Hitler's cronies were prosecuted. When it comes to diplomatic immunity agreements, war crimes seem like they might be an exception. It's not really certain.
Of course, Argentina could just say that the prince isn't allowed to come to the country, and leave it at that. I do think it's a positive that Argentina is at least bringing up this possibility and considering trying to do something about what certainly appear to be war crimes involving Yemen. There are certainly other countries that are involved in war crime, but Saudia Arabia is supposed to be an ally of many Democratic countries, which is a bit different, imo. Plus, what the Saudis are doing seems to be very deliberate.
Of course, Argentina could just say that the prince isn't allowed to come to the country, and leave it at that. I do think it's a positive that Argentina is at least bringing up this possibility and considering trying to do something about what certainly appear to be war crimes involving Yemen. There are certainly other countries that are involved in war crime, but Saudia Arabia is supposed to be an ally of many Democratic countries, which is a bit different, imo. Plus, what the Saudis are doing seems to be very deliberate.
