Underseer
Contributor
Good info if you regularly get into arguments with Christians and/or Muslims.
Palaeontology is pointless as an argument.
Noah's flood is disproven by being obviously impossible on more levels than you can shake a pointed stick at.
If you are seriously discussing the possibility that it might be a true account of events that really occurred with someone who has ever hear the word 'palaeontology', then you are wasting your time. Such a person cannot be reasoned with.
You may as well try to prove that flat-Earth believers are wrong by appealing to Special Relativity.
Once somebody is that far gone, that they have the intellectual ability to grasp what you are saying, but haven't already seen that the flaws in their beliefs are obvious and glaring, there's no reaching them.
You can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.
Poor Aron Ra, no matter what happens he looks like a biker stuffed into a nice suit lol
Ironic since the person who created paleontology wanted to use it to prove Noah's Flood was real.
Ironic since the person who created paleontology wanted to use it to prove Noah's Flood was real.
Source?