lpetrich
Contributor
Microsoft, "Software for Microcomputers", started out by making software-development tools, and it still is in that business.
By the late 1970's, early desktop computers had become a big business, and IBM wanted to get into it. But IBM's internal development processes were very cumbersome, so that the IBM PC ("Personal Computer") team decided to work quickly by getting almost all the parts from outside. One of them was the OS. Bill Gates had a corporate lawyer as his father, so he decided on an ingenious trick. After himself buying a suitable OS from outside, he sold the rights to "PC-DOS" to IBM, while retaining the rights to "MS-DOS", the same thing under a different name.
So the original IBM PC had MS's PC-DOS, an OS not even written by anyone at MS.
Some people attempted to cash in on the boom in desktop computers by ripping off existing designs. Franklin Computer's Apple-II imitation was close enough for Apple's lawyers to discover an Apple copyright statement, and Franklin Computer sank without a trace. For the IBM PC and its successors, the PC-XT and PC-AT, the only barrier was the BIOS, the boot ROM. When the cloners created lawyer-proof imitations of them, the PC clone business got started, complete with "MS-DOS" instead of "PC-DOS" as the OS. This made the PC architecture a sort of shared design, as opposed to each maker's proprietary ones. Even IBM had wanted a proprietary one, but it did so in a fashion that made it easy to imitate.
All the makers of proprietary desktop systems fell over the 1980's and early 1990's, with one exception, Apple, and Apple barely survived the early 1990's.
During this time, MS fended off competition on the PC platform with preload cliff pricing and with misleading error messages when running Windows 3.x on top of DR-DOS. Preload cliff pricing? Charging much more for 99.99% instead of for 100% of preloads. In the end, its only halfway-successful competition there is Linux, and Linux is essentially given away.
So Bill Gates is not the super genius inventor that Half-Life seems to believe that he is.
By the late 1970's, early desktop computers had become a big business, and IBM wanted to get into it. But IBM's internal development processes were very cumbersome, so that the IBM PC ("Personal Computer") team decided to work quickly by getting almost all the parts from outside. One of them was the OS. Bill Gates had a corporate lawyer as his father, so he decided on an ingenious trick. After himself buying a suitable OS from outside, he sold the rights to "PC-DOS" to IBM, while retaining the rights to "MS-DOS", the same thing under a different name.
So the original IBM PC had MS's PC-DOS, an OS not even written by anyone at MS.
Some people attempted to cash in on the boom in desktop computers by ripping off existing designs. Franklin Computer's Apple-II imitation was close enough for Apple's lawyers to discover an Apple copyright statement, and Franklin Computer sank without a trace. For the IBM PC and its successors, the PC-XT and PC-AT, the only barrier was the BIOS, the boot ROM. When the cloners created lawyer-proof imitations of them, the PC clone business got started, complete with "MS-DOS" instead of "PC-DOS" as the OS. This made the PC architecture a sort of shared design, as opposed to each maker's proprietary ones. Even IBM had wanted a proprietary one, but it did so in a fashion that made it easy to imitate.
All the makers of proprietary desktop systems fell over the 1980's and early 1990's, with one exception, Apple, and Apple barely survived the early 1990's.
During this time, MS fended off competition on the PC platform with preload cliff pricing and with misleading error messages when running Windows 3.x on top of DR-DOS. Preload cliff pricing? Charging much more for 99.99% instead of for 100% of preloads. In the end, its only halfway-successful competition there is Linux, and Linux is essentially given away.
So Bill Gates is not the super genius inventor that Half-Life seems to believe that he is.