Well, the trouble is that the right-wing media is much like a cult, mocking outsiders and dispelling any other info sources as propaganda. Cult worship and right wing politics works pretty well together. Got them to somehow convince conservatives of all walks of like to vote for Trump. I'm not certain what you think the problem is.
Any unbiased news source would devote approximately 47% of its coverage to Trump support right?
No. In no rational world would that be any part of what it means to be an unbiased news source. NPR should report on the objective facts about Trump, which all show that Trump is mentally unstable, emotionally stunted, extremely ignorant about everything relevant to Presidential decision making (including economic decision within the bounds of the law), a pathological liar, a criminal in mutliple ways from economic fraud to sexual assault, and creating a cabinet full of people who share most of these traits.
Note that nothing in this list is even a value judgment and doesn't qualify as either being against Trump. If the facts are such that all decent people view these objective traits of Trump as negative, that isn't NPRs fault and they should not make any effort to hunt for "positive" traits that don't exist just to appear "fair and balanced" to idiots who don't know what being unbiased and objective actually means.
IF anything, NPR likely has failed to report on all these facts as much as they should have because they make Trump look so bad, and NPR were overly afraid of having the appearance of bias, even if that appearance were an invalid assessment.
Reality and fact strongly favor liberal and Democratic positions. So, on average, objective and rational analyses that unbiased media should be doing will favor liberals and make conservatives "look bad", just like science tends to. The GOP is the party of anti-science, anti-education, and pro-irrational faith. This is why Scientist in the US are about 8 times more likely to be or "lean" Democrat than Republican, and why increased education leads to liberal and Democratic leanings, and this relationship is notably strongly when race is held constant (such as when examining the Education-political relationship just within whites).
Unbiased media outlets should be highly appealing to the more educated people who have more knowledge about what is being reported and thus are better able to detect misinformation. NPR has the most education in general and studies have shown have more accurate objective knowledge about specific facts related to topics widely covered by most media outlets (such as 9-11, the Iraq Invasion, climate change, unemployment, election results, current international events, current make-up of Congress, etc.).
In fact, not only were NPR viewers more accurately informed on both Domestic and International political events, but Fox News viewers were the most misinformed of all TV media viewers and the only audience who actually knew significantly less than people who consumed no media news at all (meaning that most of what they "learned" on Fox was lies and made them worse than merely being uninformed and ignorant).
This is the result of just the most recent such study, but other studies done over years ago regarding basic fact of 9-11 and the Iraq Invasion show the same pattern of results.
Correct answers to 4 purely domestic questions and 5 involving international events. Note these are all events that all the outlets "cover" in some way just not all with any regard for the relevant facts, such as the economic bailouts in Europe, sanctions against Iran, battles in Egypt and Syria, etc.).
