Derec
Contributor
‘Bail reform, it’s lit!’ NYC transit recividist brags he can’t be stopped after his latest arrest for turnstile jumping, skipping court dates
They can't even hold him when he deliberately misses court dates. Those idiots in Albany really screwed this up.
The law prevents courts from holding suspects on a wide array of crimes (including violent ones like robbery, arson etc. as long as they are charged as misdemeanors) even when they do not show up for court or keep reoffending, both of which this guy did. The only way he is special or unusual, it seems, is his brazen braggadocio over it.
Another article about the issue:
The controversy over New York’s bail reform law, explained
NYDN said:He knew that except for having to spend about 36 hours in police custody, there were no immediate consequences to his alleged crimes, which include charges he snatched cash from people trying to use MetroCard machines.
“I’m famous! I take $200, $300 a day of your money, cracker! You can’t stop me!” Barry yelled to a Daily News reporter late Thursday night as police led him out of NYPD Transit District 1 headquarters in the Columbus Circle station. “Bail reform, it’s lit!” Barry said. “It’s the Democrats! The Democrats know me and the Republicans fear me. You can’t touch me! I can’t be stopped!”
[...]
Officers who’ve gotten to know Barry over the years were looking for him that day because two warrants had been issued for his arrest after he missed court dates.
One court hearing Barry skipped is related to a Jan. 19 incident in which he was given a desk appearance ticket for allegedly stealing $50 out of woman’s hand inside the subway station at W. 42nd St. and Sixth Ave. near Bryant Park. The other hearing he missed was related to a theft in December.
They can't even hold him when he deliberately misses court dates. Those idiots in Albany really screwed this up.
Yeah, it looks like it's exactly the opposite!The Legal Aid Society said the NYPD is using a few cases to stoke fears after six weeks that bail and other reforms are a failure. It also said that despite what police say, “pre-trial incarceration actually erodes public safety and perpetuates recidivism.”
The law prevents courts from holding suspects on a wide array of crimes (including violent ones like robbery, arson etc. as long as they are charged as misdemeanors) even when they do not show up for court or keep reoffending, both of which this guy did. The only way he is special or unusual, it seems, is his brazen braggadocio over it.
Another article about the issue:
The controversy over New York’s bail reform law, explained
I.e. violent criminals are being released without bail. Or any possibility for judicial discretion.NY Times said:Outlets like the New York Post latched onto cases like that of Tiffany Harris, who was arrested three times for assaulting Orthodox Jewish women in Brooklyn in less than a week: “Harris walked free under the state’s new soft-on-crime law,” the Post wrote. On January 10, the New York Daily News ran a cover story of a homeless man who had been charged with assault being released without bail. Staten Island Assembly member Nicole Malliotakis told Tucker Carlson on Fox News that if the law doesn’t get modified, “There’s going to be blood on Governor Cuomo’s hands.”
Well, shit, perhaps Albany ought to rectify it then. Not screw it up even more.But much of the coverage has obscured or downplayed one crucial point: that since 1971, public safety — the idea of the “potential dangerousness” of someone accused of a crime — has not been a legal reason to set bail for a defendant in New York.
I do not think anybody would object to a sensible alternative to bail. This ain't it. The thing is that cash (that is forfeit if bail conditions are violated) is a strong motivator. Releasing suspects with no conditions is not.In a country overwhelmed by mass incarceration, where about 67 percent of those in county jails are there pretrial, a system where the amount of money you have on hand dictates your freedom seems antiquated at best and unconstitutional at worst.
This idea that arrests and incarcerations should mirror overall demographics is just stupid as it ignores that crime is not uniformly distributed in the population. So why should arrests and incarcerations be?People of color are disproportionately represented in New York’s prisons and jails: More than half of those incarcerated are black, although black people represent just 16 percent of the state’s population.
Bingo.But Flynn, who is vice president of the state and national district attorney associations, said the new law goes too far. “My attorneys are no longer able to argue, to point out to a judge, ‘Hey Judge, there’s a good reason to why you should put bail,’” Flynn said. “And the judges, who are elected by the people here in New York State, they now have no discretion at all.”
Last edited: