Barr is Investigating The Russian Interference Investigators

[Jimmy Higgins]

Trump released the smoking gun evidence of him trying to strong arm Ukraine into collusion for the 2020 election, and the right-wing still thinks the guy is an angel.

 

[RVonse]

There's only one solution to all this:

Have non-partisan grand jury investigations of ALL persons suspected (by anyone) of committing crimes. Regardless of political party.

It's time for the Red fanatics and Blue fanatics to get out of the way and let real patriots take charge, who care what's good for the country instead of only the Red-vs-Blue shootout.

I totally agree.

 

[ZiprHead]

There's only one solution to all this:

Have non-partisan grand jury investigations of ALL persons suspected (by anyone) of committing crimes. Regardless of political party.

It's time for the Red fanatics and Blue fanatics to get out of the way and let real patriots take charge, who care what's good for the country instead of only the Red-vs-Blue shootout.

I totally agree.

To start an investigation, probable cause is needed. Where is the probable cause that the investigators committed crimes?

Or would you just prefer show trials by a star chamber.

 

[Trausti]

There's only one solution to all this:

Have non-partisan grand jury investigations of ALL persons suspected (by anyone) of committing crimes. Regardless of political party.

It's time for the Red fanatics and Blue fanatics to get out of the way and let real patriots take charge, who care what's good for the country instead of only the Red-vs-Blue shootout.

I totally agree.

To start an investigation, probable cause is needed. Where is the probable cause that the investigators committed crimes?

Or would you just prefer show trials by a star chamber.

Ah, no. Probale cause is for searches and to arrest. An investigation is just that. This started as a civil investigaton but was changed to a criminal investigation. Either Dunham wants the additional tools of a criminal investigation, or he’s spotted there may be criminal charges. Let him finish.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

There's only one solution to all this:

Have non-partisan grand jury investigations of ALL persons suspected (by anyone) of committing crimes. Regardless of political party.

It's time for the Red fanatics and Blue fanatics to get out of the way and let real patriots take charge, who care what's good for the country instead of only the Red-vs-Blue shootout.

Well, people like you have labeled those people as ‘the deep state’.

 

[ZiprHead]

To start an investigation, probable cause is needed. Where is the probable cause that the investigators committed crimes?

Or would you just prefer show trials by a star chamber.

Ah, no. Probale cause is for searches and to arrest. An investigation is just that. This started as a civil investigaton but was changed to a criminal investigation. Either Dunham wants the additional tools of a criminal investigation, or he’s spotted there may be criminal charges. Let him finish.

Sorry, no. You need evidence of a crime to start digging into peoples lives.

 

[Trausti]

To start an investigation, probable cause is needed. Where is the probable cause that the investigators committed crimes?

Or would you just prefer show trials by a star chamber.

Ah, no. Probale cause is for searches and to arrest. An investigation is just that. This started as a civil investigaton but was changed to a criminal investigation. Either Dunham wants the additional tools of a criminal investigation, or he’s spotted there may be criminal charges. Let him finish.

Sorry, no. You need evidence of a crime to start digging into peoples lives.

Figuring out why the FBI got it 100% wrong, and inexplicably relied on a junk foreign dossier to justify spying on Americans, is probably worth a look.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Sorry, no. You need evidence of a crime to start digging into peoples lives.

Figuring out why the FBI got it 100% wrong, and inexplicably relied on a junk foreign dossier to justify spying on Americans, is probably worth a look.

When is this lie going to die? It is more full of shit than the small intestine. The Aussies and Dutch drove this, not the Republican funded Steele Dossier.

If the DNC wanted to screw Trump over, they’d have put the dossier in the wild.

 

[Trausti]

Sorry, no. You need evidence of a crime to start digging into peoples lives.

Figuring out why the FBI got it 100% wrong, and inexplicably relied on a junk foreign dossier to justify spying on Americans, is probably worth a look.

When is this lie going to die? The Aussies were talking to us first.

Then Dunham will uncover nothing. So what’s the worry?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

When is this lie going to die? The Aussies were talking to us first.

Then Dunham will uncover nothing. So what’s the worry?

First off, that is just garbage. Make a BS claim, get called on it and pull the ‘nothing to worry about’ crap.

What is there to worry about? Erdogan like behavior and using the Justice Dept to unethically investigate bullshit lies. It is an unconstitutional abuse of power that is more akin to the first stages of a dictatorial takeover than a healthy democracy.

 

[Cheerful Charlie]

Everyone harassed by Barr in this insane stunt will be liable to having to hire lawyers at expensive costs, and to put up with possible job loss, harassment by GOP Senators and Congressmen and more. Not to mention the usual death threats and personal harassment from America's far right deplorables. Just for doing their jobs.

Thanks to Trump and the far right, America is becoming an evil insane asylum out of control.

 

[ZiprHead]

For two years it was let Mueller finish his investigation. So, let Dunham finish.

One of those investigations had bipartisan support. The other is petty partisan hackery. I know you conservatives believe them to be one and the same, but they are spelled differently for a reason.

Yeah, ya gotta wonder why the Dems are so fearful of uncovering the Russia collusion hoax origins. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

We know the origins. The idiot drunk Popadpolus or what ever his name is got drunk and bragged to an Australian diplomat that they were working with the Russians to dig up dirt on Hillary. The diplomat reported it.

 

[ZiprHead]

This is banana republic type shit.

 

[Ford]

Yeah, ya gotta wonder why the Dems are so fearful of uncovering the Russia collusion hoax origins. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

We know the origins. The idiot drunk Popadpolus or what ever his name is got drunk and bragged to an Australian diplomat that they were working with the Russians to dig up dirt on Hillary. The diplomat reported it.

None of that matters. See, this was all started by the Democrats! You know...the Democrat Rod Rosenstein who was the deputy of Democrat Jeff Sessions who was only Attorney General because the Democrats in the Senate made him so. Rod appointed lifelong Democrat Robert Mueller, and it's worth remembering that this all started because that flaming liberal Democrat James Comey wouldn't rightfully submit to Trump's authority...which was granted to him by an overwhelming majority of the American people!

 

[Keith&Co.]

Figuring out why the FBI got it 100% wrong, and inexplicably relied on a junk foreign dossier to justify spying on Americans, is probably worth a look.

I thought the dossier wasn't added to the shopping list until the fourth application for a warrant?

So if this were Barr's justification, it'd be a fraud all by itself.

 

[Lumpenproletariat]

There's only one solution to all this:

Have non-partisan grand jury investigations of ALL persons suspected (by anyone) of committing crimes. Regardless of political party.

It's time for the Red fanatics and Blue fanatics to get out of the way and let real patriots take charge, who care what's good for the country instead of only the Red-vs-Blue shootout.

I totally agree.

To start an investigation, probable cause is needed. Where is the probable cause that the investigators committed crimes?

Or would you just prefer show trials by a star chamber.

We need investigations of everyone in power. Or at least everyone who is accused of anything by anyone.

The investigating bodies need to be non-partisan, not appointed by anyone holding partisan office and not consisting of any partisan office-holders. They can report their findings, regardless whether there's a criminal violation. But if they find something criminal, their report would recommend criminal prosecution.

The most important function might be the fact-finding service, giving citizens good information about irresponsible behavior of those in power, rather than determining formal guilt or innocence of individuals accused of crimes. Much corruption could be exposed even if the exact criminal acts are not determined. Such investigations would serve as a deterrent to bad behavior, plus also get needed investigations done while allowing the lawmakers to turn their attention to their proper legislative function instead of the political demagoguery.

 

[ZiprHead]

To start an investigation, probable cause is needed. Where is the probable cause that the investigators committed crimes?

Or would you just prefer show trials by a star chamber.

We need investigations of everyone in power. Or at least everyone who is accused of anything by anyone.

The investigating bodies need to be non-partisan, not appointed by anyone holding partisan office and not consisting of any partisan office-holders. They can report their findings, regardless whether there's a criminal violation. But if they find something criminal, their report would recommend criminal prosecution.

The most important function might be the fact-finding service, giving citizens good information about irresponsible behavior of those in power, rather than determining formal guilt or innocence of individuals accused of crimes. Much corruption could be exposed even if the exact criminal acts are not determined. Such investigations would serve as a deterrent to bad behavior, plus also get needed investigations done while allowing the lawmakers to turn their attention to their proper legislative function instead of the political demagoguery.

I accuse you of molesting shih tsu puppies. We should, with great amounts of news coverage, tear into your personal life for all to see.

 

[RVonse]

To start an investigation, probable cause is needed. Where is the probable cause that the investigators committed crimes?

Or would you just prefer show trials by a star chamber.

We need investigations of everyone in power. Or at least everyone who is accused of anything by anyone.

The investigating bodies need to be non-partisan, not appointed by anyone holding partisan office and not consisting of any partisan office-holders. They can report their findings, regardless whether there's a criminal violation. But if they find something criminal, their report would recommend criminal prosecution.

The most important function might be the fact-finding service, giving citizens good information about irresponsible behavior of those in power, rather than determining formal guilt or innocence of individuals accused of crimes. Much corruption could be exposed even if the exact criminal acts are not determined. Such investigations would serve as a deterrent to bad behavior, plus also get needed investigations done while allowing the lawmakers to turn their attention to their proper legislative function instead of the political demagoguery.

I accuse you of molesting shih tsu puppies. We should, with great amounts of news coverage, tear into your personal life for all to see.

And then break in to your house in the middle of night to collect evidence with about 50 heavily armed swat FBI agents.....kind of like what happened with Roger Stone and his wife.

 

[Jarhyn]

I accuse you of molesting shih tsu puppies. We should, with great amounts of news coverage, tear into your personal life for all to see.

And then break in to your house in the middle of night to collect evidence with about 50 heavily armed swat FBI agents.....kind of like what happened with Roger Stone and his wife.

With a warrant, against an administration official expected to destroy evidence of aware of the incoming action, as the administration has shown that if they are aware of action, that they Stonewall, obstruct, and otherwise resist justice.

We do this for Criminals of all sorts. Why do you only seem to have a problem when the target is white and rich? Unless your face happens to be glued to their ass?

Personally, I would have preferred if the action could have been accomplished in the day, peaceably, without any trouble, obstruction, avoidance, or other rat-fuckery. But this is the real world.

 

[ZiprHead]

I accuse you of molesting shih tsu puppies. We should, with great amounts of news coverage, tear into your personal life for all to see.

And then break in to your house in the middle of night to collect evidence with about 50 heavily armed swat FBI agents.....kind of like what happened with Roger Stone and his wife.

You mean the guy who had a warrant issued against him by a judge that was given evidence of criminal activity on his part? The guy who could destroy valuable evidence and has a history of bragging about his guns and marksmanship? Damn straight the officers are going to go in armed and ready for confrontation.