Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
What an ignorant statement. Do you have anything of relevance, or are you just another propaganda parrot?
What an ignorant statement. Do you have anything of relevance, or are you just another propaganda parrot?
What an ignorant statement. Do you have anything of relevance, or are you just another propaganda parrot?
What an ignorant statement. Do you have anything of relevance, or are you just another propaganda parrot?
LOL. Seriously, right Out Loud.
Your insult-fest is pretty juvenile. Chill out, dude. Have some fun. Learn something. Enjoy the fellowship of people who like to discuss politics.
Or, not.
Your call.
We've been here for a long time having conversations. You just barged in and started belching. KInda funny.
And real quick, what will you say when Ben Carson drops out of the race? He's going to. It's certain. You probably aren't familiar with a guy named Paul Tsongas. Paual Tsongas was the first Democrat to put his name up for the POTUS nomination back in 1992. He actually got some press for a while and then faded. And so it goes in every Presidential election. Carson will be gone soon. And what good will that money that people are now sending him have done? The point is that you can say that a guy is popular today, but it's dangerous to do so when you aren't familiar with recent POTUS elections. The clowns rise to the top early on and then fade quickly. Will you come back and say, "Okay, you guys were right. Ben Carson did raise a lot of money but it turned out he really wasn't ever going to be President after all"?
LOL. Seriously, right Out Loud.
Your insult-fest is pretty juvenile. Chill out, dude. Have some fun. Learn something. Enjoy the fellowship of people who like to discuss politics.
Or, not.
Your call.
We've been here for a long time having conversations. You just barged in and started belching. KInda funny.
Kiss my ass, leftist lying corrupt trash. Smear merchants.
Kiss my ass, leftist lying corrupt trash. Smear merchants.
But do you believe Ben Carson's story is accurate to actual events?
Now that I have read the story, I am sure it mostly is. As I pointed out earlier (and for some reason ignored) there was a documented campus hoax where students were told that tests were destroyed and that students should report for a retest. And it was reported that "several" students appeared. And the course was in psychology. Whether or not it was "Perceptions" or another course is unclear (there is listed a Perceptions course at the 300 level but a Yale librarian says either it was not taught that year, and/or did not exist).
Finally, whether or not the proctor was an actual professor, or an unknown fake, is also unclear. It's a rather obscure event and a personal story of luck (or God's hand), heretofor only of significance to Carson.
http://digital.library.yale.edu/cdm...dn/id/10981/rv/compoundobject/cpd/10987/rec/1
Either Carson misremembered or made assumptions about the course title-number, OR he is right and the librarian claim is misleading or wrong. (EG - Was this course taught under another name, or was it taught during Carson's undergrad years and did Carson mis-remember the year it happened?)
So either Carson or the librarian or Carson is mistaken on the name/year OR in 1990 Carson totally invented his being one of those hoaxed and invented narrative and the events that transpired during the fake retest.
Until there is more evidence than this, Carson's being one of the several students hoaxed sounds plausible.
Two other women corroborated her story in written statements. Both were pressured and/or intimidated not to testify before the confirmation hearings. Even Anita Hill had details of her private life publicly released and ridiculed on conservative talk radio in an attempt to discredit and humiliate her.I kmow this. I know that no one corroborated her story.
Hey, leave your mother out of this.Anything else, you piece of ignorant hateful leftist racist trash.
And real quick, what will you say when Ben Carson drops out of the race? He's going to. It's certain. You probably aren't familiar with a guy named Paul Tsongas. Paual Tsongas was the first Democrat to put his name up for the POTUS nomination back in 1992. He actually got some press for a while and then faded. And so it goes in every Presidential election. Carson will be gone soon. And what good will that money that people are now sending him have done? The point is that you can say that a guy is popular today, but it's dangerous to do so when you aren't familiar with recent POTUS elections. The clowns rise to the top early on and then fade quickly. Will you come back and say, "Okay, you guys were right. Ben Carson did raise a lot of money but it turned out he really wasn't ever going to be President after all"?
Just for the record, Tsongas was not a clown, IMHO. He was an intellectual and therefore wholly unsuited to the campaign trail.
Kiss my ass, leftist lying corrupt trash. Smear merchants.
Now that I have read the story, I am sure it mostly is. As I pointed out earlier (and for some reason ignored) there was a documented campus hoax where students were told that tests were destroyed and that students should report for a retest. And it was reported that "several" students appeared. And the course was in psychology. Whether or not it was "Perceptions" or another course is unclear (there is listed a Perceptions course at the 300 level but a Yale librarian says either it was not taught that year, and/or did not exist).
Finally, whether or not the proctor was an actual professor, or an unknown fake, is also unclear. It's a rather obscure event and a personal story of luck (or God's hand), heretofor only of significance to Carson.
http://digital.library.yale.edu/cdm...dn/id/10981/rv/compoundobject/cpd/10987/rec/1
Either Carson misremembered or made assumptions about the course title-number, OR he is right and the librarian claim is misleading or wrong. (EG - Was this course taught under another name, or was it taught during Carson's undergrad years and did Carson mis-remember the year it happened?)
So either Carson or the librarian or Carson is mistaken on the name/year OR in 1990 Carson totally invented his being one of those hoaxed and invented narrative and the events that transpired during the fake retest.
Until there is more evidence than this, Carson's being one of the several students hoaxed sounds plausible.
I just read that link and what I think I hear you saying is that Carson got TAKEN IN BY A PARODY NEWSPAPER ARTICLE along with "several other students," and somehow in his mind that translated into over a hundred students AND him getting an award for being the "most honest one"
ARE YOU SERIOUS?
This is your exculpatory evidence?!?!
This isn't just another layer of humor? You are actually saying that Ben Carson should be given the benefit of the doubt because he is not lying since he was taken in by a parody - and he never did realize the joke and wrote that into his book!? That the ten bucks was the chump fee for being on candid camera.
This is WORSE! You want the guy who is the butt of a hoax - who never figures it out EVER - to have the code to the button!?
This is your story? Are you sticking to this!?
This is even more hilarious than telling a lie and thinking you won't get caught.
He was essentially on Candid Camera and thought it was real AND STILL DOES! It's like saying the guy who crashed his car speeding away from Orson Wells' radio program is a hero!
He got the "name" wrong?Second, Carson conceded he got the course name wrong in the 1990 book.
And no, I don't want Ben Carson - I would like to see his campaign implode (along with Trump's). However, I don't let my political preference taint my honest evaluation of what are some very obvious and reckless smears.
Here's a little info on your mom
https://tobiasmastgrave.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/shoggothbeast.jpg
No, I made her change the sheets. They were starting to smell.Here's a little info on your mom
https://tobiasmastgrave.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/shoggothbeast.jpg
Awww, poor baby. Is your smear campaign falling apart?
No, I made her change the sheets. They were starting to smell.Awww, poor baby. Is your smear campaign falling apart?
No, I made her change the sheets. They were starting to smell.
Your sheets, your smell. That's who you are.