Biden administration excludes white farmers from loan foregiveness

[laughing dog]

In other words, just another ideologically-driven illogical attack. I guess somethings just don't change.

It isn't "illogical", but it is certainly an attack on leftist logic. Leftist logic assumes an inequitable outcome is proof of structural racism. I pointed out that there hadn't even been an inequitable outcome.

That is an illogical conclusion based on the pathetic straw man premise of "Leftist logic assumes an inequitable outcome is proof of structural racism". It is par for your course.

 

[Metaphor]

In other words, just another ideologically-driven illogical attack. I guess somethings just don't change.

It isn't "illogical", but it is certainly an attack on leftist logic. Leftist logic assumes an inequitable outcome is proof of structural racism. I pointed out that there hadn't even been an inequitable outcome.

That is an illogical conclusion based on the pathetic straw man premise of "Leftist logic assumes an inequitable outcome is proof of structural racism". It is par for your course.

You use the word 'illogical' a lot but you don't seem to understand what it means. In any case, it is not a straw man of leftist (in particular, CRT thought) that inequitable outcomes are regarded as proof of structural racism. The assumption is made routinely. Indeed, as espoused by people like Kendi, all actions and policies that do not reduce inequity are racist.

 

[laughing dog]

That is an illogical conclusion based on the pathetic straw man premise of "Leftist logic assumes an inequitable outcome is proof of structural racism". It is par for your course.

You use the word 'illogical' a lot but you don't seem to understand what it means.

Sure Jan, whatever ironic statements you need to cope with reality.

In any case, it is not a straw man of leftist (in particular, CRT thought) that inequitable outcomes are regarded as proof of structural racism. The assumption is made routinely. Indeed, as espoused by people like Kendi, all actions and policies that do not reduce inequity are racist.

There some on the left who feel like that and there are those on the left who do not. Your sweeping generalizations are nothing more than sad coping mechanisms

 

[Metaphor]

Sure Jan, whatever ironic statements you need to cope with reality.

In any case, it is not a straw man of leftist (in particular, CRT thought) that inequitable outcomes are regarded as proof of structural racism. The assumption is made routinely. Indeed, as espoused by people like Kendi, all actions and policies that do not reduce inequity are racist.

There some on the left who feel like that and there are those on the left who do not. Your sweeping generalizations are nothing more than sad coping mechanisms

For those playing at home, we have laughing dog attacking me because I said
*inequity in outcome is used by leftists as evidence of an ism/phobia (laughing dogs response: not all leftists)
*there was no evidence of inequity in outcome in the 2020 agricultural bailout, despite the implication that there was by posting a Mother Jones article trumpeting a 97% claim
*therefore, even by the standards of those on the left that think inequitable outcomes imply discrimination/racism/etc, there is no evidence that discrimination by race occurred in the 2020 bailout

And laughing dog uses this series of assertions to make assumptions about my mental health.

 

[laughing dog]

Sure Jan, whatever ironic statements you need to cope with reality.

In any case, it is not a straw man of leftist (in particular, CRT thought) that inequitable outcomes are regarded as proof of structural racism. The assumption is made routinely. Indeed, as espoused by people like Kendi, all actions and policies that do not reduce inequity are racist.

There some on the left who feel like that and there are those on the left who do not. Your sweeping generalizations are nothing more than sad coping mechanisms

For those playing at home, we have laughing dog attacking me because I said
*inequity in outcome is used by leftists as evidence of an ism/phobia (laughing dogs response: not all leftists)
*there was no evidence of inequity in outcome in the 2020 agricultural bailout, despite the implication that there was by posting a Mother Jones article trumpeting a 97% claim
*therefore, even by the standards of those on the left that think inequitable outcomes imply discrimination/racism/etc, there is no evidence that discrimination by race occurred in the 2020 bailout

And laughing dog uses this series of assertions to make assumptions about my mental health.

Sigh, here you go again with the mischaracterizations and nasty accusations. I'll let you play your stupid games by yourself.