No you aren't. Where did rousseau say anything about competence? Postulating equal competence at reproduction, blacks were likely to perform worse at it than whites on average because they typically faced greater external obstacles to reproduction.
It's a little hard to reconcile. It seems there is a greater diversity of thought than I imagined. Also an apparent lack of interest in doing a quick google search of fertility rates in Europe, North America and....African nations.
Rousseau and I were discussing the history of late 19th-century and early 20th-century Brazil. No doubt a quick google search of fertility rates in Europe, North America and African nations will tell us why the Brazilian population got whiter during that period. The apparent lack of interest here is your apparent lack of interest in reading for content rather than your personal triggers. Speaking of which...
The legal rape is long over.
Crime is not over.
The genetic diversity is more about protection from disease and recessive defects.
Nobody wants to be raped. But nobody living today is legally raping anyone.
The diversity would occur without the rape. The rape is not necessary. But the rape is long over.
At least we can revel in the sound knowledge that genetic exchange between groups never happens unless rape is involved and that therefore rape is a good thing.
Doesn't follow from anything I'm saying.
I'm talking about what did happen, not what should have happened.
What should have happened though leaves Africans in Africa and the millions of descendants of slaves living in the US never exist.
You make many assumptions, including that the presence of genetic markers identified as ‘european’ could only have found their way to to the genome of African Americans through the rape of African slaves and their decendants through the rape of slave women by white men of European descent.
No, untermensche assumed nothing of the sort. You are "reading between the lines", and poorly. You are shoehorning your own hangups and bugbears into his thoughts.
Further, your postulation that these rapes increased ‘genetic diversity’—presumably only for African Americans as you seem to ignore that any whites women might have had children by black men,
Your presumptions are on you. He did nothing to invite them.
is based upon the assumption that there is significant genetic differences between European and African populations compared with variations between individuals within African populations and within European populations.
People don't have to assume any random X you make up just because you've made some arbitrary mental association between X and whatever they're talking about. Untermensche's comments were silent and neutral on the relative magnitude of between-population vs. within-population differences. Stop projecting.
You seem to ignore millennia of human migration and cultural exchange along with the inevitable exchange of genes. Frankly it sounds as though you are making the argument that white slave owners raping their black slaves improved the stock by increasing their genetic diversity.
All in all I find your line of thinking flawed and disgusting.
Oh for the love of god. He's arguing against isolationism and anti-race-mixing bigotry. You're the one displaying flawed thinking. You're imputing bad motivations where there's no reason to, because you're conflating what untermensche said with what some completely different person in your past experience said -- the same thing you were doing to rousseau. Stop thinking that way. Read for content, not your pet triggers. I've rarely seen a poster here treat another as unfairly as you treated untermensche.