I hate to start another thread on this, but I have to ask.
The way I see it the prosecutor rambled on but basically said Darren Wilson's story didn't corroborate the eye witness accounts therefore there wasn't a compelling reason to charge Wilson.
Is that about the size of it?
That the prosecutor is an idiot and doesn't want to charge an innocent man because the perpetrator's story didn't match the witness accounts.
well duh, idiot prosecutor that does happen.
The way I see it the prosecutor rambled on but basically said Darren Wilson's story didn't corroborate the eye witness accounts therefore there wasn't a compelling reason to charge Wilson.
Is that about the size of it?
That the prosecutor is an idiot and doesn't want to charge an innocent man because the perpetrator's story didn't match the witness accounts.
well duh, idiot prosecutor that does happen.