fromderinside
Mazzie Daius
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 15,945
- Basic Beliefs
- optimist
In my example one needs take in to account likelihood that a particular measure isn't just extraneous phenomena. We have examined neural electrical activity to the ner-do-well and we have found general activity not particularly relevant to underlying neural local function. Sure there is onset and awareness indices but they are way too weak or late to provide index even to threshold. Point is study of local function requires something more onto time and activity expected by underlying processes.. At this stage of study there are lots of good reasons to ignore particular sets of data.
My argument relates to matching process to activity not some general index like REM. Every good statistician knows the risks of adding variables just to get significance. Does rings-of-Saturn effects ring any bells?
My argument relates to matching process to activity not some general index like REM. Every good statistician knows the risks of adding variables just to get significance. Does rings-of-Saturn effects ring any bells?