1) Why do you believe him?? He's barely even a stopped clock. Even when he is "right" he gets it wrong. I'm thinking of the crash in Washington (not a DEI in the tower, but a military pilot who wasn't where they should be) and the recent runway excursion where he's blaming the "DEI" copilot when what the copilot was saying was right but the white male fuckup in the pilot's seat wasn't listening.The agency said the rollback will save $310 billion, reduce electricity prices and “unleash” America’s energy, including coal and natural gas.
Good news indeed.
Environmental organizations have heavily criticized the move and are saying they will take the issue to court. “The Trump administration is handing the fossil fuel industry a license to keep polluting,” said Holly Bender, chief program officer at the Sierra Club, adding that the organization “will fight back against this reckless and dangerous proposal with everything we have in the courts, in Congress, and in communities.”
The Sierra Club is run by a bunch of extremists.
This obsession with "carbon" needs to stop. It is not a "pollutant".
Go fill up your house with carbon then.The agency said the rollback will save $310 billion, reduce electricity prices and “unleash” America’s energy, including coal and natural gas.
Good news indeed.
Environmental organizations have heavily criticized the move and are saying they will take the issue to court. “The Trump administration is handing the fossil fuel industry a license to keep polluting,” said Holly Bender, chief program officer at the Sierra Club, adding that the organization “will fight back against this reckless and dangerous proposal with everything we have in the courts, in Congress, and in communities.”
The Sierra Club is run by a bunch of extremists.
This obsession with "carbon" needs to stop. It is not a "pollutant".
- While Earth’s climate has changed throughout its history, the current warming is happening at a rate not seen in the past 10,000 years.
- According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), "Since systematic scientific assessments began in the 1970s, the influence of human activity on the warming of the climate system has evolved from theory to established fact."1
- Scientific information taken from natural sources (such as ice cores, rocks, and tree rings) and from modern equipment (like satellites and instruments) all show the signs of a changing climate.
- From global temperature rise to melting ice sheets, the evidence of a warming planet abounds.
The rate of change since the mid-20th century is unprecedented over millennia.
Earth's climate has changed throughout history. Just in the last 800,000 years, there have been eight cycles of ice ages and warmer periods, with the end of the last ice age about 11,700 years ago marking the beginning of the modern climate era — and of human civilization. Most of these climate changes are attributed to very small variations in Earth’s orbit that change the amount of solar energy our planet receives.
The current warming trend is different because it is clearly the result of human activities since the mid-1800s, and is proceeding at a rate not seen over many recent millennia.1 It is undeniable that human activities have produced the atmospheric gases that have trapped more of the Sun’s energy in the Earth system. This extra energy has warmed the atmosphere, ocean, and land, and widespread and rapid changes in the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere, and biosphere have occurred.
Do scientists agree on climate change?
Earth-orbiting satellites and new technologies have helped scientists see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate all over the world. These data, collected over many years, reveal the signs and patterns of a changing climate.
Scientists demonstrated the heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases in the mid-19th century.2Many of the science instruments NASA uses to study our climate focus on how these gases affect the movement of infrared radiation through the atmosphere. From the measured impacts of increases in these gases, there is no question that increased greenhouse gas levels warm Earth in response.
Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.
,.![]()
I ridiculed this before because the numbers did not make sense. Now I find it's the reporting that doesn't make sense--the actual number is $370 million. Not billion.The agency said the rollback will save $310 billion, reduce electricity prices and “unleash” America’s energy, including coal and natural gas.
Good news indeed.
The earth has warmed and cooled, warm and cooled. In the 70s the “scientists” were worried about a coming ice age. You should be thankful that we have avoided it.
I’d really like to know how the “scientists” propose to stop earth’s climate from ever changing. More cycle lanes in Santa Monica? lol!!
A small step, yes. But in the right direction.The earth has warmed and cooled, warm and cooled. In the 70s the “scientists” were worried about a coming ice age. You should be thankful that we have avoided it.
I’d really like to know how the “scientists” propose to stop earth’s climate from ever changing. More cycle lanes in Santa Monica? lol!!
He doesn't comprehend basic addition.The earth has warmed and cooled, warm and cooled. In the 70s the “scientists” were worried about a coming ice age. You should be thankful that we have avoided it.
I’d really like to know how the “scientists” propose to stop earth’s climate from ever changing. More cycle lanes in Santa Monica? lol!!
According to the evidence, it's what we are adding to the process that's the issue.