Jarhyn
Wizard
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2010
- Messages
- 14,857
- Gender
- Androgyne; they/them
- Basic Beliefs
- Natural Philosophy, Game Theoretic Ethicist
Oh hi Toni. Try actually talking to my post. Yours didn't speak to it at all.
I said men shouldn't be held responsible for children they don't want for sex they didn't want to have. I have also argued, here, that if people want a child, they should accept a child regardless of whose genitals were involved making it, and that it is often MORE right for a child to be raised by non-biologocal parents. I didn't say anything about being raised outside a family or without love. I just said by people who actually plan for a child. People who WANT one. Because parents who plan for a child get no guarantee of one, and people who don't get no guarantee of not-a-child, and one ethical duty of human to each other is to remove elements of chance where none ought exist.
Now, please read my posts, or do what is right and recuse yourself from the conversation that you clearly haven't been paying attention to.
I said men shouldn't be held responsible for children they don't want for sex they didn't want to have. I have also argued, here, that if people want a child, they should accept a child regardless of whose genitals were involved making it, and that it is often MORE right for a child to be raised by non-biologocal parents. I didn't say anything about being raised outside a family or without love. I just said by people who actually plan for a child. People who WANT one. Because parents who plan for a child get no guarantee of one, and people who don't get no guarantee of not-a-child, and one ethical duty of human to each other is to remove elements of chance where none ought exist.
Now, please read my posts, or do what is right and recuse yourself from the conversation that you clearly haven't been paying attention to.