SLD
Contributor
Considering all that was happening in Europe in 1914, it has always seemed to me that World War I was inevitable, and that by June, 1914 there was no stopping the march to war. The Assassination of the Archduke was really must the last step in a long history of causes of the war.
But many historians now see this differently, arguing that a seeries of misjudgments by diplomats led both sides to blunder into war. Certainly they did, starting with Austria's foreign minister, Berchtold assumptions about the ultimatum to Serbia. The German Chancellor, Bethmann Hollweg even undermined the Kaiser's moves towards conciliation. The same is true of Russian diplomats who pressured the Tsar towards full Russian mobilization. British indecisiveness also encouraged Germany to act more aggressively. All in all the diplomats failed to understand what was about to be unleashed, even though some prescience is demonstrated by the Monarchs. The Assassinated Archduke had stated that a general war would be disastrous for both Russia and Austria. Whilhelm and his cousins the Tsar and King George were reluctant to get involved.
But in a larger sense, the failures of these diplomats is reflected in the general atmosphere in their home countries for war. The Austrian people wanted war with Serbia. The French people relished a war of revenge against Germany. On July 31st a French pacifist, Juan Juares, leader of the
Socialist party was assassinated - his killer eventually acquitted. Notice the famous picture of Munich in 1914- the crowd was ready to all sign up, imcluding an enthusiastic Austrian, Herr Hitler. The clamor for war was simply too great for leaders to ignore. It had almost broken out several times in the decade previous - one diplomatic crisis after another. The people seem both resigned to its inevitability and relieved it was finally getting going. Little did they know.
So could it have been stopped by that point? If diplomacy had prevailed better in 1914 would the war have just started again a year later?
SLD
But many historians now see this differently, arguing that a seeries of misjudgments by diplomats led both sides to blunder into war. Certainly they did, starting with Austria's foreign minister, Berchtold assumptions about the ultimatum to Serbia. The German Chancellor, Bethmann Hollweg even undermined the Kaiser's moves towards conciliation. The same is true of Russian diplomats who pressured the Tsar towards full Russian mobilization. British indecisiveness also encouraged Germany to act more aggressively. All in all the diplomats failed to understand what was about to be unleashed, even though some prescience is demonstrated by the Monarchs. The Assassinated Archduke had stated that a general war would be disastrous for both Russia and Austria. Whilhelm and his cousins the Tsar and King George were reluctant to get involved.
But in a larger sense, the failures of these diplomats is reflected in the general atmosphere in their home countries for war. The Austrian people wanted war with Serbia. The French people relished a war of revenge against Germany. On July 31st a French pacifist, Juan Juares, leader of the
Socialist party was assassinated - his killer eventually acquitted. Notice the famous picture of Munich in 1914- the crowd was ready to all sign up, imcluding an enthusiastic Austrian, Herr Hitler. The clamor for war was simply too great for leaders to ignore. It had almost broken out several times in the decade previous - one diplomatic crisis after another. The people seem both resigned to its inevitability and relieved it was finally getting going. Little did they know.
So could it have been stopped by that point? If diplomacy had prevailed better in 1914 would the war have just started again a year later?
SLD