I don't understand the logic. How does one experiment and come to conclusiions with divinity and Christ in the lab? Physics, regardless how far we have reached in this field , requires an actual specimen/ subject for study itself.
No, it doesn't. We know ALL possible interactions with matter on human scales; So we know that there cannot be any unknown interactions.
If there were interventions by the divine, these could only occur via one of the four known forces, all of which we would easily detect. In this case, absence of evidence IS evidence of absence - indeed, it's proof of absence.
Gravitational theory doesn't tell you about the beyond classical physics - Quantum theory has never had a subject/ specimen of a divinity (to know what it is) to base the erroneus claim for proof.
Again, no such subject is needed. And classical physics WORKS - except in extreme cases that don't apply to human scales. Equally, Quantum Field Theory WORKS - no new theory will change its effectiveness AT HUMAN SCALES.
A creator god isn't impossible - just useless, as it fails to answer the question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" which it purports to address.
Thats a question both sides could ask.
But the answer "something made it" isn't an answer to the question, and only one side recognises that (while the other ties itself into pretzels of special pleading, trying to exempt gods from being 'something'".
But the idea that a creator implies, by its failure to be provably non-existent, that other traits associated by Christians with their god are also not disproven, is nonsensical.
YOUR god cannot exist. That's been proven to be true; Just as rocks that fall upwards have been proven not to exist. That a 'set and forget' creator god cannot be proven not to exist doesn't change that fact one iota.
It may seem like QT is your best argument (imo getting no-where).
Lets put physics aside I say in general - for the moment at least- since it tells us zilch, BUT rather ... let us work with what
we do have tangible in the bio-chemistry, archelological and historric areas!!
Physics underlies all of those fields. Let's not "put physics aside" - it tells us everything we know. You might as well say "let's put reality aside".
In fact, it very much seems that you are. Your implication that Jesus, as a divine entity, might not be accurately described as 'on a human scale', shows just how far out of your depth you are; The 'scale' in question isn't some metaphysical idea, it's exactly what is says - it refers to physical size. As I thought I made clear earlier, 'human scale' in my argument means 'bigger than an atom, but smaller than a galaxy'. Christ most assuredly wasn't larger than the planet Earth, nor did his disciples require a magnifying glass to see him, so he is a human scale phenomenon - about the size of a human.
And far more importantly, those with whom he was alleged to interact were human-sized. Not galactic sized, or atom sized, but somewhere in between. Objects at that scale interact ONLY with the four forces of the Standard Model. This is known, because mass/energy equivalence means that if any other forces existed at that scale, we would have seen an equivalent force carrying particle in our particle accelerators. And we haven't.
No sample of the divine is required to test divine interactions with matter - just an exhaustive list of all interactions matter can have with anything. We have such a list. There are four (and only four) such interactions at human scales. Divine interactions are impossible, unless they use one of those four forces, in which case they would be very easily detected.
