I get that.
And i'm saying you're wrong to do that (save only that you refer to every single science as atheistic). Not only wrong, but betraying significant ignorance.
There's the scientific theory, there's the "let's credit god" apology, and there's 'nothing-but-god creationism.
not that evolution is always atheistic - but I rejected Christian theistic evolution and went straight to atheistic evolution.
No, no you did not. If you referred to it as atheistic evolution, you were still giving credit to creationist attempts to control the debate. Like their idea thsst you could not study evolution without abandoning God completely. This is wrong. This is their false claim.
All science is neutral on the supernatural, or it isn't science.
For color theory chart there's the light filter chart and pigment-based chart, right?
Not atheistic color chart versus stained-glass-windows color chart.