empty
New member
My child? Wow!
New evidence is available now? Oh goody. Like what? That the building fell down twice the speed of free fall?
act like a child and ye shall be treated like a child. you obviously arent interested in having a real debate since you have to rely on strawman arguments; you may as well stop now
The thermite would stop working at some point. Once it cuts, it cuts. It doesn't have the ability to stay hot for weeks.
thermite and the steel it melted in an insulated envirnoment would stay hot for weeks, and even months as was the case as documented by many sources
Molten metal means nothing. Aluminum is a metal. Has a relatively low melting point. Molten steel would be interesting. No evidence of that. And this ignores the conspiracy problem of explaining why there was molten steel in the first place. What was keeping it molten, heck, what made it molten in the first place?
didnt i tell you to try harder?
here, this should help. How to Debunk WTC Thermite at Ground Zero
Actually the fire engineers are upset because they feel the building wasn't fireproofed enough. If you actually read their objections in context, you'd know that.
http://www.ae911truth.org/home/350-evidence-destroyed-is-justice-denied.htmlBuilding fire expert and editor-in-chief of Fire Engineering Magazine Bill Manning wrote, “Such destruction of evidence shows the astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough, scientific investigation…I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence. To treat the September 11 incident any differently would be the height of stupidity and ignorance… The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.”
Are you claiming that all three building failed in the same manner? You'd have to be rather unschooled in physics and engineering to even think for a second that it'd be possible for WTC 7 to collapse in any method similar to a completely different design such as WTC 1 and 2.different modes ov failure, whether true or not, does not mean they werent all stagedThe collapses of all three towers were different modes of failure, yet you claim that they were all staged.
you cant point to where i said all three modes were the same, i was merely qualifying my statement for universality
no the three modes were not all the same
The fact that WTC 1 and 2 failed differently implies that staging of the collapses would have been different. That would seem nonsensical for a conspiracy.
no it would make more sense for a conspiracy since they were attempting to make their destruction look natural. if they were identical, that would give it away
All of them? The guys that design all of these skyscrapers? All of them in on the conspiracy? Hundreds of thousands of them?
not all ov those who designed the towers agree it wasnt a demolition, such as richard humenn, who was the chief electrical designer
based on the current power structure ov the world, with rich 'elites' controlling mass media, you only need a few vetted yes men, some ov whom probably did help design the tower, and the rest are occupied with making ends meet or have no knowledge ov historical and current event examples ov false flags or other illegitimate uses ov power
That'd be none of them. There is not a single structural engineer among any of these Truther movements. Not one. That is pretty damning.
kamal obeid, s.e., structural engineer
steven dusterwald, p.e., structural engineer
casey phieffer s.e., structural engineer
david topete s.e., structural engineer
ronald brookman, s.e., structural engineer
If they were, you'd have offered evidence to the contrary.both ov these statements are entirely falseThere are no civil engineers that support the Truther movement. In fact, there are few people with science degrees that support it.
low hanging fruit is why
civil engineers
william rice p.e., civil engineer
ronald angle p.e., civil engineer
kevin connors p.e., civil engineer
rob belles m.s., civil engineer
nelson johnson m.a., civil engineer
science degrees
steven jones, ph.d physics
david chandler, m.s. math b.s. physics
robert podolsky m.s. physics
jeffery farrer ph.d m.s. physics
jason cheshire b.s. chem.e.
i could put more, but i dont want to waste too much ov my time on you