• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Doctored OPCW Report on Alleged Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria

https://twitter.com/Tareq_Haddad/status/1203274308811993088

Yesterday I resigned from Newsweek after my attempts to publish newsworthy revelations about the leaked OPCW letter were refused for no valid reason.
I have collected evidence of how they suppressed the story in addition to evidence from another case where info inconvenient to US govt was removed, though it was factually correct.

I plan on publishing these details in full shortly. However, after asking my editors for comment, as is journalistic practice, I received an email reminding me of confidentiality clauses in my contract. I.e. I was threatened with legal action

I am seeking legal advice on how to proceed and whether I may be entitled to some type of whistleblower protection due to possibly fraudulent behaviour. At very least, I will publish the evidence I have without divulging the confidential information.

So this is why this is not in "reputable" news sources.
 
https://twitter.com/Tareq_Haddad/status/1203274308811993088

Yesterday I resigned from Newsweek after my attempts to publish newsworthy revelations about the leaked OPCW letter were refused for no valid reason.
I have collected evidence of how they suppressed the story in addition to evidence from another case where info inconvenient to US govt was removed, though it was factually correct.

I plan on publishing these details in full shortly. However, after asking my editors for comment, as is journalistic practice, I received an email reminding me of confidentiality clauses in my contract. I.e. I was threatened with legal action

I am seeking legal advice on how to proceed and whether I may be entitled to some type of whistleblower protection due to possibly fraudulent behaviour. At very least, I will publish the evidence I have without divulging the confidential information.

So this is why this is not in "reputable" news sources.
Yeah, shit gets more and more serious.
 
https://twitter.com/Tareq_Haddad/status/1203274308811993088

Yesterday I resigned from Newsweek after my attempts to publish newsworthy revelations about the leaked OPCW letter were refused for no valid reason.
I have collected evidence of how they suppressed the story in addition to evidence from another case where info inconvenient to US govt was removed, though it was factually correct.

I plan on publishing these details in full shortly. However, after asking my editors for comment, as is journalistic practice, I received an email reminding me of confidentiality clauses in my contract. I.e. I was threatened with legal action

I am seeking legal advice on how to proceed and whether I may be entitled to some type of whistleblower protection due to possibly fraudulent behaviour. At very least, I will publish the evidence I have without divulging the confidential information.

So this is why this is not in "reputable" news sources.
Yeah, shit gets more and more serious.

You're the guy that keeps defending the propaganda capital of the world.
 
In short, according leaked info:
1. Other than ordinary background level There was no evidence of poison found.
2. Symptoms reported are not consistent with gas claimed to be used.
3. Containers which were supposedly dropped by Assad from their could not have been delivered in that fashion.
 
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/201...ion-opcw-douma-coverage-misses-crucial-facts/

bellingcat reaction to the scandal. Claims that final report took into account email complaint and made it less outrageous, but not before US bombed Syria. So the original report did not find anything, OPCW redacted it to make like there was evidence, US/UK bombed Syria, then year later they released report which had much less certainty then the redacted one, but everyone has already forgot about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom